Womens Tennis in General - Page 2 - TennisForum.com

Old Sep 6th, 2011, 07:05 PM
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,120

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Caroline
Serena (blech)
Flavia
50/50 chance between Stosur and Vera. Stosur goes into her mental lapses, as we all know, so it matters how she will perform mentally. Vera can be the same way but she has been very consistent this tournament; flying under the radar has helped her. I am leaning more towards Vera.

CAROLINE *SUNSHINE* WOZNIACKI
Maria SharapovaAndrea PetkovicFrancesca SchiavoneFlavia PennettaSabine Lisicki♥

"You must suck in real life, cause online you are too awesome! " --------

Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
SwissMiss19 is offline

Old Sep 6th, 2011, 10:22 PM
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: N 55° 40' - E 012° 30'
Posts: 224

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrissie-fan View Post
Not being a betting man myself, what does this all mean? The lower the number the more likely they are to win?
Exactly. The odds tell how much money you are paid if your bet of 1 wins. If the odds are 2.00, you get your money doubled - this is also known as evens, a toss-up or fifty-fifty.

In a tennis match, the favorite (as the market sees it) will always have odds between 1.00 and 2.00, while the underdog will have odds from 2.00 and up.

The odds also estimate the probability that the player wins. The favorite will have a probability between 50 % and 100 % to win. Odds 1.67 corresponds to 60 %, odds 1.25 corresponds to 80 %, and odds 1.11 corresponds to 90 %. Mathematically savvy readers will understand that the odds and the probability are reciprocal numbers.

My favorites: Caroline Wozniacki, (Patty Schnyder), Samantha Stosur, Julia Görges, Natalie Schiller. Your favorites may differ.
Crockett is offline
Old Sep 6th, 2011, 11:22 PM
Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,182

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crockett View Post
Exactly. The odds tell how much money you are paid if your bet of 1 wins. If the odds are 2.00, you get your money doubled - this is also known as evens, a toss-up or fifty-fifty.

In a tennis match, the favorite (as the market sees it) will always have odds between 1.00 and 2.00, while the underdog will have odds from 2.00 and up.

The odds also estimate the probability that the player wins. The favorite will have a probability between 50 % and 100 % to win. Odds 1.67 corresponds to 60 %, odds 1.25 corresponds to 80 %, and odds 1.11 corresponds to 90 %. Mathematically savvy readers will understand that the odds and the probability are reciprocal numbers.
You lost me at "exactly."

Don't get on the scale if U ain't got the weight
It's more hard to love than it is to hate

Rock 'n' Roll Is Alive! (And It Lives In Minneapolis)
DownInAHole is offline
Old Sep 6th, 2011, 11:34 PM Thread Starter

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,748

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Quote:
Originally Posted by DownInAHole View Post
You lost me at "exactly."
It means that Caroline is the favorite to beat Petkovic and that Serena and Pavlyuchenkova shouldn't even bother playing.

Chrissie-fan is offline
Old Sep 6th, 2011, 11:54 PM
Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,720

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrissie-fan View Post
It means that Caroline is the favorite to beat Petkovic and that Serena and Pavlyuchenkova shouldn't even bother playing.
That pretty much sums it up The lowest I've ever seen Caro be for a match is 1.04 btw ...

SUNSHINE

WTA #1 for 67 Weeks.
2010, 2011 WTA YE#1
TennisFan66 is offline
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 12:35 AM Thread Starter

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,748

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Quote:
Originally Posted by TennisFan66 View Post
That pretty much sums it up The lowest I've ever seen Caro be for a match is 1.04 btw ...
Against who was that? Brie Whitehead?

Chrissie-fan is offline
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 01:18 AM
Crazy Conspiracy Theorist, Politically Incorrect

Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Marti-Party Room
Posts: 32,101

Re: Womens Tennis in General

What I miss bloody much and not a little bit is a player that don't use ball bashing or power tennis to beat their opponent but using their brains and thinking tennis is like a chess game like Martina Hingis did in her prime : I'm so nostalgic about those times : and without power and without ball bashing you can win slams : Martina showed it ! Why all those girls have to follow the bad steps of the WS ? FFS ! The WS have destroyed the beauty of the women's tennis game by bringing that physical and brutal tennis ! That's why I admired Martina so much and still am her n°1 Belgian fan : well at least at the French part side

Wolves are my soul, my everything !

Know your real ennemies : don't let you fool by the mainstream media : They are full time LIARS ! NEVER trust the government !

BNP Paribas, JP Morgan, Lagardere are criminals : WAKE UP !
Martian Jeza is offline
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 03:46 AM
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,182

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian Jeza View Post
What I miss bloody much and not a little bit is a player that don't use ball bashing or power tennis to beat their opponent but using their brains and thinking tennis is like a chess game like Martina Hingis did in her prime : I'm so nostalgic about those times : and without power and without ball bashing you can win slams : Martina showed it ! Why all those girls have to follow the bad steps of the WS ? FFS ! The WS have destroyed the beauty of the women's tennis game by bringing that physical and brutal tennis ! That's why I admired Martina so much and still am her n°1 Belgian fan : well at least at the French part side
Martina is the best
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 03:57 AM
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southland
Posts: 6,947

Re: Womens Tennis in General

My apologies if this was already discussed to death here in another Caro forum thread but...
I'm curious as to how you guys felt about that Hingis interview where she was asked about her and Caroline being similar. I've always had such an appreciation for Hingis's game but I must admit, Martina's comments left me disappointed in her. I feel as though I may have taken it to heart a bit much though so I wanted to see what your perspective on it was since there seems to be alot of Hingis/Caroline fans here.

"If music be the food of love, play on"
Bonfire is offline
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 04:08 AM
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southland
Posts: 6,947

Re: Womens Tennis in General

as far the QF (please let the rain allow it tomorrow) predictions..

Caroline in 2
Serena in 2
Vera in 3
Pennetta in 3

those are my picks

"If music be the food of love, play on"
Bonfire is offline
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 05:30 AM
Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,594

Re: Womens Tennis in General

I was also surprised that Martina responded like that. She should show more respect to Caroline. Although, the person who interviewed her was one of those hacks who does not like Caroline so maybe he kind of pushed her to say that. If not, it was pretty low from Martina especially because Wozniacki was her fan.
marineblue is offline
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 05:54 AM
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southland
Posts: 6,947

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Quote:
Originally Posted by marineblue View Post
I was also surprised that Martina responded like that. She should show more respect to Caroline. Although, the person who interviewed her was one of those hacks who does not like Caroline so maybe he kind of pushed her to say that. If not, it was pretty low from Martina especially because Wozniacki was her fan.
Yeah I had heard that the guy interviewing her was sort of anti-Wozniacki so I had wondered if some her words were taken out of context.

"If music be the food of love, play on"
Bonfire is offline
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 07:00 AM
Senior Member

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 10,182

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAPRIATI420 View Post
Yeah I had heard that the guy interviewing her was sort of anti-Wozniacki so I had wondered if some her words were taken out of context.
Referring to Amélie Mauresmo's muscular build on the eve of their 1999 Australian Open final, Hingis told reporters, "She's half a man."

When asked in the late 1990s how she felt about the budding rivalry between herself and the then-up-and-coming Anna Kournikova, Hingis responded, "What rivalry? I win all the matches."

After the Williams sisters (Venus and Serena) had complained of discrimination against them, Hingis told Time magazine in 2001: "Being black only helps them. Many times they get sponsors because they are black. And they have had a lot of advantages because they can always say, 'It's racism.' They can always come back and say, 'Because we are this color, things happen.'"

At the peak of the Williams sisters' and Hingis' competitive and fierce rivalry, Hingis stated in a press conference during the 1999 US Open referring to the sisters' remarks, "They always have big mouths. They always talk a lot. It's happened before, so it's gonna happen again. I don't really worry about that."

On the long-dominant player, Steffi Graf, Hingis said, "Steffi has had some results in the past, but it's a faster, more athletic game now than when she played. She is old now. Her time has passed." (Hingis made this comment in 1998 while Graf was on an injury-related hiatus from tennis, and before she lost against the German player in the 1999 French Open final).

Responding in a 1999 press conference on why she terminated her doubles partnership with former Wimbledon champion Jana Novotná, Hingis remarked, "She's old and slow."

I wonder if these are out of context too
but Martina is much more mature and humble now and those words are most likely out of context.
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 07:14 AM
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southland
Posts: 6,947

Re: Womens Tennis in General

"If music be the food of love, play on"
Bonfire is offline
Old Sep 7th, 2011, 08:12 AM Thread Starter

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 13,748

Re: Womens Tennis in General

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian Jeza View Post
What I miss bloody much and not a little bit is a player that don't use ball bashing or power tennis to beat their opponent but using their brains and thinking tennis is like a chess game like Martina Hingis did in her prime : I'm so nostalgic about those times : and without power and without ball bashing you can win slams : Martina showed it ! Why all those girls have to follow the bad steps of the WS ? FFS ! The WS have destroyed the beauty of the women's tennis game by bringing that physical and brutal tennis ! That's why I admired Martina so much and still am her n°1 Belgian fan : well at least at the French part side
I think it were Seles and Capriati that started the age of power tennis actually. Their 1991 semi final at the USO is legendary for introducing, or at least popularizing power hitting. Of course, the Williams sisters took it further still, but you have to keep in mind that tennis rackets continue to improve all the time and that the game evolves with the material that the players have at their disposal. Power hitters dominate the game today because the modern rackets with their huge sweetspot and trampoline effect reward that type of play. It would have been impossible to play like that with the rackets of thirty years ago. In the age of power tennis it becomes increasingly difficult for 'touch players' to be competitive with the ball constantly coming at you with the speed of light. Hingis, ok. But Hingis is a genius.

Chrissie-fan is offline

Message:
Options

## Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.

User Name:
 Please enter a valid email address for yourself. Email Address:
OR

## Log-in

 User Name Password Remember Me?
Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.