Tennis Forum banner

Venus gets Hackleroad - was Dockic right?

1K views 36 replies 32 participants last post by  charmedRic 
#1 ·
A very convenient draw for Kim like last year who they are trying to adopt and a Hackleroad for venus first round? many from other
boards are very suggestive of AO as the riggers Open. Dockic just did not say it from thin air. She had her suspicions and she was an insider.
Many have suspected this Aussie open for a while and don't buy this open
draw rubbish. But It aint gonna work.
The Aussies better get real and learn the elements
of fair play or their open would be ramain what it is. Second fiddle long distance slam that many don't care about.
 
#4 ·
SpikeyAidanm said:
I really cannot tolerate any more of this rigging draw business.

Why would the Aussie Open draw Scud vs Johansson, Hewitt vs Federer as a R4 etc etc

It really is sad to see some people believing such a Grand Slam would purposely fix their draws, that thought just sickens me.
I agree, i think ppl should just let it go. The way the draw is made is completely random, god it must have been worse with only 16 seeds in the slam, it must have been rigged every time :rolleyes: . Some players get injured and rankings fall, i am sure if venus ,kim or justine had drawn monica in the first round had she been playing ppl would have gone mental. Players like Harkelroad are up and coming, they dont have the rank yet so are bound to get a tough opponent.
 
#5 ·
SpikeyAidanm said:
I really cannot tolerate any more of this rigging draw business.

Why would the Aussie Open draw Scud vs Johansson, Hewitt vs Federer as a R4 etc etc

It really is sad to see some people believing such a Grand Slam would purposely fix their draws, that thought just sickens me.
exactly! of they had wanted to rig the draw, scud wouldnt get johansson, hewitt-federer, and kim-marlene!
 
#9 ·
vutt said:
In a way when they gave Venus #3 seed they fixed something in draw to. Not that I'm complaining, but just technically speaking. ;)
Isn't the first time exceptions were made and
surely won't be the last. However, technically speaking,
nothing was fixed because the rules clearly say it is at their discretion.;)
 
#10 ·
I rigged the AO draw. I created a computer virus, hacked into the computer at the draw ceremony that RANDOMLY places players, relased the virus. The effect was to place players in the position where I wanted them and ensure they have easy opponets.

God their are more conspiracies theories associacted with tennis draws then there is with the Kennedy assisantion, roswell and area 51
 
#19 ·
Don't they do this draw live on tv... explain how you rig something like that??
 
#22 ·
Bovinasboyfriend said:
Giving A.H. Venus in the first round= A.H will be out in the first round (99.999%)

A.H. is a new name that draws crowd

A.H. out=less $$$ for the Aus open.
Precisely. The only possible reason to do it would be if you knew Ashley was hot and Venus was lousy. Then you would get a lot of media attention for the shock defeat and new star and wouldn't have venus getting in Kim's way. Unless they do know something we don't, as you say the fix would be silly.
 
#24 ·
Hurley said:
Personally, I think players like Dockic and Hackleroad are right on the money. When players like Heckin, Clicksters, and the Villiams sisters learn about draw-rigging, it will be better for the sport.
:haha: Especially that Heckin, she needs to be tought some manners. It's like she doesn't even care that her first round match against the lowest ranked player in the draw is obvious to everyone to be rigged. :lol:
 
#26 ·
Draws are rigged because behind tennis the sport you have human beings. LMAO

It saddens me that many tennis fans can't see behind their own egos. So you're a tennis fan, honey child that doesn't mean draws are fair in tennis. Alot of you can't see the Forrest for the trees.

I don't believe in lotterys and I surely don't believe all is fair in tennis draw/lotterys.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top