What was the old points system like? - TennisForum.com
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old Feb 12th, 2002, 07:29 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Jippo McScally's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,997
What was the old points system like?

Can anyone tell me???
Jippo McScally is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old Feb 13th, 2002, 03:28 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: the sexy side of the colo
Posts: 3,402
I'm no expert on this. So take this info with more than one grain of salt.

There have been several different ranking systems in the past. Some were variations of the current system. They would, for example use a different number of minimum tournaments to calculate total rank points (18 tournies, 16 tournies, etc.) The rank points looked similar to what we see today with top ten players having in the thousands of points (Jennifer at 4,800)

Other ranking methods were fundamentally different. One method would take the total number of rank points and divide by the number of tournies played to get an average number of points. Under such a system, Jennifer (the #1 player) would have maybe 500 or so points.

I don't exactly know why the system has changed over time. I think I remember reading that the tour promoters wanted to get the players to play more. Hope this helps.
Bright Red is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old Feb 13th, 2002, 03:44 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Christchurch, NewZealand
Posts: 692
Hey there Jippo if that is ure real name go to sanexwtatour.com and look around in there!! tey have a very good info about rankings and it describes most of the systems there. good luck
Linton is offline  
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old Feb 13th, 2002, 02:08 PM
Plainclothes Division
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Park, CO
Posts: 6,350
The early ranking systems were "averaging" systems; total points divided by tournaments played. Usually, the only tweaking that went on was with the minimum divisor or the points allotment. In the early days, there were a lot of decimals, and your #1 player would have an average like 15.xxxxxxxxx. They later boosted the points to make the numbers easier to comprehend for the average fan. (And to make them look better.) The tour went to a "rolling 52" system in 1997, whereby the points were just added up. The complaint was that it dramatically favored those who played more. So results were capped, first at 18, then 17 tourneys. There were still complaints of the system favoring "quantity over quality", but when you consider that 1 tournament win gives you more points than 4 quarterfinal finishes, that complaint seemed groundless.

Interestingly, one of the complaints voiced last year was that the system didn't allot enough points for slam wins; "only" twice that of a Tier I. Those critics called for a return to systems similar to the past. Ironically, under one of the old systems cited as desirable, slams were only awarded 75% more points than a Tier II.
Brian Stewart is offline  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old Feb 13th, 2002, 02:26 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Jippo McScally's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,997
Thanx everybody!

Linton, my real name is Gareth. Why the ''?
Jippo McScally is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome