Tennis Forum banner

Jon Wertheim USO Report: SF Serena d Svitolina, Kvitova d Halep

5K views 59 replies 47 participants last post by  PlanetVenus 
#1 ·
#9 ·
No wonder he's worthless.

Dodin to beat JJ ?? Not with her form of 2015
 
#53 ·
USO 1R: (WC) Dodin def. (21) Jankovic 2-6, 7-5, 6-3

Gee .....
 
#16 ·
I wonder where he'll be ranked if he plays some of the TF games. :worship:
Like, Kvitova NEVER reached QF in USO... of course that section is full of out-of-form players but... I don't think she could play well for three consecutive weeks under mono. It'll be surprising if she goats here.

and Svitolina :tape: She had a deep run at Cincy but...if you choose Petra to reach F then why don't you choose Ana in this section? :drool: well if Pova is injured and Ana flops then there'll be a surprising SF-ist here. She and JJ just gotta hope that Pome takes away a brainless Ana. Or else it'll be a pigeon run for Ana from R4.
 
#17 ·
He may be right about the semifinalists, but he got the winner wrong . Svitolina def. Kvitova :haha:
 
#18 ·
I'm not sure why people think Svitolina is such a ridiculous choice. She is one of the more consistent performers and outside of her retirement at New Haven, her losses in the US swing have been to Kerber, Azarenka, and Serena. I probably wouldn't pick it, but she isn't exactly coming out of left field.
 
#23 ·
They pay him for that? :spit: :help: Petra in the final. :happy: And Halep never did anything in this tournament. About Svitolina, I don't know, because that quarter may be pretty open if Maria loses early. It that case, I can see either Svitolina or JJ.
 
#27 ·
Predicting E. in the SF :inlove:
 
#35 ·
How many times was this guy proven wrong?
I can understand putting Serena and Halep in the semis but Kvitova reaching the last 4 at her worst slam with all the humidity and crowd?And Svitolina's i-kinda-do-everything-decent-put-nothing-spectacular game? I can think of 5,6 players with more realistic chances
 
#36 ·
:facepalm:
Even the filthiest of TF.com haters could write and sell better journalistic waste byproduct than this guy.
I mean, does anyone know when the last time was that this he had anywhere near 30% 10% of his predictions come true?
Still, his writing and credibility is a perfect indicator of SI's quality today.
The two are perfect for each other.
 
#38 ·
At this point you must not have a clue about tennis to take Jon predictions of good. I seriously doubt that this guy is watching the tour.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top