Shoud we get back to the 16 seed format? - TennisForum.com
View Poll Results: How many players should be seeded at a GS?
8 2 4.88%
16 17 41.46%
32 19 46.34%
64 3 7.32%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 01:59 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pyongyan
Posts: 2,421
                     
Shoud we get back to the 16 seed format?

I really think the GSs were much more exciting espeically in the early rounds when there were only 16 seeded players.
Guess clay court some clay court players complaining about not being seeded despite their rankings at the Wimby was the major reason why the format was changed. But given that surfaces matter much less in women's tennis and the depth isn't that great yet, I hardly see it has done any good to women's side. Can the GSs use different seeding formats for men and women? I just get bored in the first couple of rounds of major tournaments including Indianwells and Miami where too many players are seeded and most of the matches are just not worth watching.
What's your take on that?
Doraemon is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 02:19 AM
Senior Member
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 180,344
                     
16 seeds

i'd rather be unseeded than be seeded 25-32.

Good luck in 2016 to my favs*Kuznetsova*Sharapova*Kleybanova*Vesnina*Shvedova*Kulichkova*Kasatkina*
Pavlyuchenkova*Makarova*Diatchenko*Pivovarova*Gasparyan*Leykina*Zhuk*Potapova*Pervushina*AZARENKA *Govortsova
MINELLA TsurenkoAlize Lim*El Tabakh*Robson*Cirstea
*Juhaszova*Zanevska*Broady*Bouchard*
Cetkovska*Svitolina*
Pliskova's*Rus*Bellis*Soylu*Sibille*Uberalova*Eden Silva*
http://www.twitter.com/TheBoiledEgg
TheBoiledEgg is online now  
post #3 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 02:40 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TOTALBELGIANDOMINATION 04
Posts: 70
             
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBoiledEgg
16 seeds

i'd rather be unseeded than be seeded 25-32.
That's because 17 to 32 should be put randomly in the draw... They shouldn't do 2 categories: 17-24 and 25-32.

I do prefer 32 seeds than 16. But I agree with TBE, right now, it's better to be unseeded than being seeded 25 to 32.
AndyLoefflerCaro is offline  
post #4 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 02:53 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,649
                     
how bout 2 seeds? lol

It doesn't matter if you win by an inch or a mile, winning's winning

*Schett Seles Schnyder Rubin Suarez Pierce*
fried_beans is offline  
post #5 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 02:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 527
                     
Having 16 seeds (again) would be absurd. Not only would it be a step in the wrong direction, but it would only further add to the problems surrounding the women's game. Can you imagine if the #16 player in the world somehow drew the #17 player? I give the example of Roddick having to play Henman at the USO in the 1R (however, Henman was 'slipping' at the time). It shouldn't happen to anyone. Those matchups should be saved for the later rounds.

-- Chris -- AIM: dieudevin -- Keeper of Henin's awe inspiring backhand, Davenports's three majors (and wins over the Williamses!) and Harkleroad's upsets.

Lindsay Davenport is god.


Proudly cheering on Davenport, Capriati, Shaughnessy, Golovin, Sprem, Dementieva, Clijsters, Henin-Hardenne, Rubin, Washington, Uberoi, Petrova, Zvonareva, Kuznetsova, Fernandez, Schnyder, Rodionova, Morariu, Kirlenko, Sharapova, Mauresmo, and Frazier!
i heart backhand is offline  
post #6 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 03:20 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,557
                     
I much preferred when it was only 16 seeds. Makes the game a lot more exciting. It ensured a lot more movement in the rankings which is good to see.
Vicky88 is offline  
post #7 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 03:37 AM
Senior Member
 
azza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EVIES THROAT CHOKING.....
Posts: 24,931
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBoiledEgg
16 seeds

i'd rather be unseeded than be seeded 25-32.
why?
azza is offline  
post #8 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 03:49 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pyongyan
Posts: 2,421
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by azza
why?
Because you are totally guaranteed to face a top 8 seed in the third round if you reach there.
Doraemon is offline  
post #9 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 03:50 AM
Senior Member
 
VeNuS#1LoVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Planet Venus
Posts: 3,823
                     
Yes, 16 Seeds should come back. It offered possible good first round matches, now the early rounds are quite boring.

Venus Williams
2007 Memphis Champion


Serena Williams
2007 Australian Open
VeNuS#1LoVa is offline  
post #10 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 03:52 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TOTALBELGIANDOMINATION 04
Posts: 70
             
The early round are boring with 16, 32 or 64 seeds, it has nothing to do with the number of seeds.

Yes, you get more boring match in the first 2 round with 32 seeds, but you get more boring third round matches with 16 seeds.
AndyLoefflerCaro is offline  
post #11 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 03:52 AM
Senior Member
 
VeNuS#1LoVa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Planet Venus
Posts: 3,823
                     
OMG! TBE, I just realized you have 51,000 some odd posts?!?!?!?! How do you do it?

Venus Williams
2007 Memphis Champion


Serena Williams
2007 Australian Open
VeNuS#1LoVa is offline  
post #12 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 04:08 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pyongyan
Posts: 2,421
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by i heart backhand
Having 16 seeds (again) would be absurd. Not only would it be a step in the wrong direction, but it would only further add to the problems surrounding the women's game. Can you imagine if the #16 player in the world somehow drew the #17 player? I give the example of Roddick having to play Henman at the USO in the 1R (however, Henman was 'slipping' at the time). It shouldn't happen to anyone. Those matchups should be saved for the later rounds.
Well.. it is an entertainment business we're talking about here. so I don't know if we always should put players' interest first. Funs need some intersting match-ups in the first and second rounds which can hardly be expected in the 32 seed format. I was really excited when Henman and Roddick got drawn to face each other in that first round. It's not absurd at all. Some luck should be involved cuz that's really a part of the sport and an important one. When Steffi faced Lori in the first round of Wimby, I don't think Steffi complained about the seeding format after her loss. It's just in men's tennis the seeding is more complex as there are so many different forces depending on surfaces. I would welcome a first round match between the top seed and a top 20 player with open arms!
Doraemon is offline  
post #13 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 04:12 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: TOTALBELGIANDOMINATION 04
Posts: 70
             
There are so many matches the first 2 rounds, some are interesting no matter the number of seeds, the problem is that it's not matches that are show on tv...

Anyway 16 or 32, the top players win their first rounds matches easily, there isn't much of a difference. At least with 32 it's more fair for players ranked between 17 and 32.
AndyLoefflerCaro is offline  
post #14 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 04:56 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 7,044
                     
Go back to 16 seeds.

Mens draws-Quite honestly, theres so much friggin depth in mens tennis these days that anyone in the top 80 can literally beat anyone in the world on a given day. Look at Karlovic knocking out Hewitt at Wimby, lucky loser Bastl knocking out Sampras, or Wayne Arthurs beating Guga when he was ranked #2 and Arthurs about #140. You'll still see upsets in the mens draw regardless.

Womens draws.-I know its a business and you want your stars to be there on the final days. But 16 seeds or 32 seeds, you will still have in the worst case scenario for the semis: At least 1 Williams Sister, at least 1 Belgian, a Davenport or a Capriati, and then maybe a player like a Sharapova (in a year or so) or a Mauresmo. Once in a blue moon you'll get a surprise like a Clarisa Fernandez or Nadia Petrova. You'll still get your high ratings regardless. Furthermore, 32 seeds alienates fans of womens tennis in the first week because in the coverage (at least in the US) they REFUSE to go anywhere else besides the main 2 courts unless you're deep into a third set for women or a late 4th set/5th set for men. So you're forced to watch Serena hammer some poor girl whos been in challengers and Tier V qualies all year. And they don't even TALK about the unknown girl and try and give you a sense of her. The match is so bad that you're forced to talk about what you see happening in the 2nd week blah blah.

Heres my advice: Either go back to 16 seeds or have ESPN cover the blowouts and have the Tennis Channel cover JUST the outer courts. Not everyone likes to watch blowouts.
CoryAnnAvants#1 is offline  
post #15 of 20 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 05:29 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 427
 
The last time a Grand Slam had 16 seeds, Barbara Schett beat Venus Williams in the 1st round. With 32 seeds, Babsi wouldn't have ever faced Venus in the 1st round. THAT'S the type of thing they're trying to avoid now.


16 or 32, I'll be watching the GS's either way.
Myskina Lina is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome