are winner/error ratios that reliable in assessing matches? -
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 10 (permalink) Old Nov 29th, 2003, 07:15 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pyongyan
Posts: 2,426
are winner/error ratios that reliable in assessing matches?

I always wonder how important and realiable winner/(unforced) error rations are when we discuss how good or bad the matches are.
It seems to me every tournament or tournament website uses a different way of counting those numbers. Some seem very strict about counting winners and others are quite lenient.
For example a 20/10 ration by one way of counting could be like a 15/15 by another. Then we are seeing totally dfferent stats from the same match and we still jump to some conclusion relying on the one you have in handy. I know those are important stats but we shouldn't take them too seriously and jump to too quick conclusions.
what d'ya think?
Doraemon is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 10 (permalink) Old Nov 29th, 2003, 07:32 PM
Senior Member
crazillo's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 35,416
you have to see the match to say if it was good or not!
crazillo is online now  
post #3 of 10 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 10:40 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Pyongyan
Posts: 2,426
Doraemon is offline  
post #4 of 10 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 10:44 AM
Senior Member
~ The Leopard ~'s Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kissing my little Lolita
Posts: 13,157
It's one indication, but you really need to see the match.

Vin, kvinder og sang
~ The Leopard ~ is offline  
post #5 of 10 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 03:39 PM
*JR*'s Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On the Peace Train
Posts: 34,303
Ova-rated stat, as there are "semi-forced" errors that don't count as either, cases where your UE's go up because strategy dictates running a tired or unfit opponent around, etc. etc.
*JR* is offline  
post #6 of 10 (permalink) Old Nov 30th, 2003, 03:57 PM
Senior Member
Experimentee's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 13,068
No bc that doesnt tell you about the closeness or drama of the match. The 2001 FO final seemed to have a bad winners/errors ratio but it was exciting bc of the drama.
Also it doesnt tell you about forced errors, which are just like winners but dont count towards that stat.
So you really need to see a match to decide.
Experimentee is offline  
post #7 of 10 (permalink) Old Dec 1st, 2003, 06:43 AM
Plainclothes Division
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Park, CO
Posts: 6,354
Winner/error ratios aren't highly reliable, for a number of reasons.

For one, UE's aren't assessed in a consistent manner. What's called a UE in one match isn't in another. Some counts are way off the mark. The worst I've ever seen was a match in which the UE total was inflated by a factor of 12!

Another reason is that UEs aren't the only kinds of errors. In addition to forced errors, there are also tactical errors and execution errors. I've seen many matches which are loaded with the latter two, which were really poorly played matches, but they came up quite "clean" on the stats sheet.

And there are the errors themselves. The UE stat equates a shot that just missed the line, or clipped the tape, with one that's sent into the next court. That's hardly the same. Plus, the stats don't tell you when the errors occured. Was it on the 3rd stroke? The 10th? The 20th? And it doesn't measure the quality of the rallies. If two really fast players are facing off, there are often several spectacular shots that should be winners, which are returned into play. Thus, even if the point ends in a UE, in order to assess the quality of the match, you'd have to treat it as if there were a couple of winners hit as well.

Which underscores what the posters above were saying. You really have to see the match to be sure. The stats are no more absolute than the scorelines. I've seen 6-1 and even 6-0 sets that were dead even, and 6-4 sets that weren't competitive at all.
Brian Stewart is offline  
post #8 of 10 (permalink) Old Dec 1st, 2003, 06:47 AM
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 43,440
Yep....nothing that actually watching a match to tell if it was good or not. Numbers are just that: numbers. Donīt tell the whole story.

Always bet on black!
Can you handle the truth?
The truth:
Serena Williams: Greatest African-American tennisplayer in history
21 majors:6366

Official Prince of the Royal Court
bandabou is offline  
post #9 of 10 (permalink) Old Dec 1st, 2003, 01:26 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 956
I agree that watching a match is the best way to evaluate. For what it's worth, I do read the match stats. The statistic that I find to be most under-reported (or talked-about), is the "total points won". You could win a match 6-3, 6-2 and that would be considered a lop-sided win, yet the number of points won was something like 85-83, which clearly indicate that the match was awfully close. In fact about 2 years ago, Patty Schydner won a match where she scored FEWER total points than the winner of the match. This has happened a few time actually.

Perhaps we should all not pay so much attention to stats anyway.

No One Can Make You Feel Inferior Without Your Consent

- Eleanor Roosevelt

Until the philosophy which holds one race
Superior and another inferior
Is finally and permanently discredited and abandoned
Everywhere is war, me say war...

- Bob Marley/Haile Selassie
calabar is offline  
post #10 of 10 (permalink) Old Dec 1st, 2003, 04:19 PM
*JR*'s Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: On the Peace Train
Posts: 34,303
There's this Patty Penchant for the unique.
*JR* is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome