She's been #1 for an hour, so I gotta ask. What's wrong with Capriati? - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 04:40 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,671
                     
Post She's been #1 for an hour, so I gotta ask. What's wrong with Capriati?

Wierd question to ask about the new #1, I know. But she hasn't won a tournament since the French. The French is in June. She's not playing badly, not at all. But she isn't winning.

Since the French ....

DFS - Tauziat
Eastbourne - Davenport
Wimbledon -Venus
Stanford - Clijsters
San Diego - Venus
Los Angeles - Davenport
Toronto - Serena
Pilot Pen - Venus
USOpen - Venus
Brasil Open - Seles
Princess Cup - Dokic
Leipzig - Clijsters
Kremlin Cup - Dokic

Isn't it about time she steps up?

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.

Last edited by Volcana; Dec 3rd, 2005 at 03:00 AM.
Volcana is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 04:50 AM
country flag ys
Adrenaline junkie
 
ys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: always on the move
Posts: 21,985
                     
Post

I think she'll actually step down. She is slumping.

Even if it is extremely diificult for me to speak it out, it is clear for me that she is a transitional #1, and the countdown for Venus taking the throne is officially started. I thought that Hingis might rebound at the yearend and pick up some good points before Venus will be within striking distance. But Capriati won't do that. Expect Venus to take over it the same way, by default, after AO. And actually, it is
refreshing thought, I start to think that Davenport might have a shot at it too. Hingis won't play indoors. Venus and Serena might not play indoors too. Clijsters is in a kind of slump. Davenport is the best indoors player. If she wins tomorrow's final Zurich and Munich, she'll be in the race.

"..just knowing that as long as i choose life, there is hope."

Je ne suis pas charlie

PLAY TENNIS!
ys is offline  
post #3 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 05:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sailing my ship
Posts: 3,626
                     
Thumbs down

It is amazing to me that Jennifer has not even been the no. 1 player for a day and already people are tearing her down. Why? Why can't everyone congratulate her for her fine achievement and let her enjoy it for however long she is ranked in the top spot? <IMG SRC="smilies/firey.gif" border="0">
I find it ironic that after her FO victory, everyone was proclaiming Jennifer as the no. 1 player in the world. Now that she has claimed that spot, everyone is already looking at her as a transitional no. 1.

This time last year, no one would have thought that Jennifer Capriati would win two grand slams and get the no. 1 ranking. What she has done this year has been a marvelous achievement and she needs to be congratulated for it, not torn down because she doesn't meet everyone's expectations for what a number player should be, which to be honest, I am curious as to what everyone thinks a number 1 player should achieve in a season.

Everyone keeps touting Venus as the inevitable number 1. Venus is a beautiful, intelligent young woman and a great player, but until Venus actually plays an entire year of tennis, she is not going to be ranked no. 1. For the last two years, Venus has played her best tennis starting at Wimbledon and ending with the US Open. That is 3.5 or 4 months of solid tennis, when the sport is played for 11 months. Venus is more than capable of playing great, consistent tennis on any surface, but she needs to be committed to doing so.

I think instead of looking for ways to tear down players; we should look for ways to cheer their efforts and applaud their victories. Life as an athlete is difficult enough without having to deal with the expectations of fans who seem to not want to see the good side of things.

Am I wrong here?

Please don't misunderstand. I am not trying to insult anyone, but I really need to understand why everyone is so hellbent to put Jennifer's achievement down so quickly.
apoet29 is offline  
post #4 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 05:42 AM
Senior Member
 
DutchieGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: my own Dutchie world
Posts: 152,959
                     
Post

ys... I sort of agree with you... in that Jenn is a transitional #1... but we don't know who might get it next... could be Lindsay, could be Marti, could be Venus!

btw... why do you say Kim is in a slump? She just won Leipzig! <IMG SRC="smilies/smile.gif" border="0">

http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/i...10/sheadam.jpg

She & Him @ Melkweg "The Max", Amsterdam 6th May 2010
DutchieGirl is offline  
post #5 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 06:08 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 26
   
Lightbulb

We are still in shock really that Jennifer really made it to #1. Weird how life can turn around for some interesting loops. I think it is great that Jennifer can say I was #1 and I have 2 GS.
Very cool.
I wish Monica's year in 2002 to be just as fantastic! <IMG SRC="smilies/bounce.gif" border="0">
Ronny and James is offline  
post #6 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 06:11 AM
Don't mess with Texas!
 
Jarrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 5,716
                     
Post

2002 is Monica's year, I am sure of it! <IMG SRC="smilies/bounce.gif" border="0">

"Gee, Quinn... I hope that little foray of yours into Geekland just now is the result of heat exhaustion, and not an unpleasant side effect of all that tutoring. I mean, you're not turning into a brain, are you?" -- Sandi

Jarrett is offline  
post #7 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 06:22 AM
Senior Member
 
LucasArg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 16,319
                     
Post

Probably Jenifer will keep the higher ranking till the next Aus Open, when she has to start defendig points...

Jenifer goes up in the rank and down in the game!!!!!!!!

I know some people will start to criticices me because of my posts, but THIS IS WHAT I THINK.

VENUS WILLIAMS
SERENA WILLIAMS
PAULA ORMAECHEA
LucasArg is offline  
post #8 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 06:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 7,401
                     
Post

the pressure of keeping the No.1 ranking is now in Jenny's hand. Good luck to her. <IMG SRC="smilies/wink.gif" border="0">

SMARTINA---The Thinking Game!!!!

SERENA---The Goddess in planet Venus.

"Happiness keeps us Sweet
Trials make us Strong
Sorrows keep us Human
Failures keep us Humble
Success makes us Eager,
But Love keeps Us Going"
jomar is offline  
post #9 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 06:56 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Williams Rulez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Venus!
Posts: 20,610
                     
Wink

Haha... no pressure for her... yet. Venus is still a good 500 points behind and Martina is not playing until next year. But come Austrialian Open 2002 <IMG SRC="smilies/wink.gif" border="0">

VENUS
Serena
Lindsay Jelena Maria

Mary : Monica : Svetlana : Sania : Jennifer : Amelie
Roddick : Grosjean : David : Djokovic
Williams Rulez is offline  
post #10 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 07:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 7,376
                     
Red face

apoet29, I agree with you.....this topic is definitely negative and a bit misguided. Volcana fails to mention that Jennifer was entered in less than half of the tournaments he/she lists. The post makes it appear Jen hasn't won in the last thirteen tournaments she entered which is entirely false!

Here is a more accurate representation of the tournaments Jen has entered since Wimbledon and the players she lost to:

Wimbledon - Justine (SF)
San Diego - Monica (QF)
Toronto - Serena (F)
New Haven - Venus (SF)
New York - Venus (SF)
Filderstadt - Sandrine (QF)

Although Jen may not be playing as well as she did the first half of the season, I don't think anything is "wrong" with her. It is VERY tough to maintain the amazing level of play she exhibited earlier over an entire season, both emotionally and physically - just ask any of the top players (Venus, Lindsay, Martina)and I'm sure they'll all agree. The results above are more than respectable and I'd match Jen's yearly results against any other player over the past year.

It's unfortunate there are so many negative posters on here. <IMG SRC="smilies/frown.gif" border="0">

Congratulations, Jennifer!!! <IMG SRC="smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0">
GoSandrine is offline  
post #11 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 09:11 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Banks of the Goulburn
Posts: 5,664
 
Post

The first postive thing about Martina not being number 1 anymore, She won't have tripe like this directed at her <IMG SRC="smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0">
Adrian is offline  
post #12 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 01:44 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,671
                     
Post

apoet29 - Actually, I've posted about Jenn's winlessness since RG before this. (Of course, the title of the thread in no way indicates this.) I figured Jenn's ascension would mean more people interested in analyzing her, her game, and how she's been playing. If you don't like the thread, you have the ability to say so, and to keep saying so if you want. Since I feel the thread is appropriate, I'll just keep going til I find people interested.

Personally, I don't view Venus or anyone else as inevitable #1's. There's a reason there are so few of them. But not winning a tournament in four months and as a result of that taking over the #1 spot seems odd. I knew some of Jenn's fans would view that as an attack, not a topic for analysis as well. That's their right.

But until Jenn wins another tournament, the question is gonna be out there. If you wanna ignore it, go right ahead. Either she'll win something, and the question will be made moot. Or she won't, and the theme of OZ 2002 will be 'Why can't the world #1 win?'

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.

Last edited by Volcana; Dec 3rd, 2005 at 03:02 AM.
Volcana is offline  
post #13 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 04:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: sailing my ship
Posts: 3,626
                     
Talking

Thanks for clarifying your position Volcana. I agree with you. There is nothing wrong with questioning the abilities of the world no. 1. After all, he or she sets the standard by which his or her sport is regarded and serves as a role model for other players. I was reacting to some of the mean-spirited posts about Capriati's ascension. I apologize for mistaking yours as being one of them.

I must agree with GoSandrine though. There have been thirteen tournaments since the FO, but Jennifer has only played in six of them, so it is unfair to say she hasn't won the last 13. A player should only be held accountable for the tournaments they play in and win or lose, not for all tournaments played.

Thanks for replying.
apoet29 is offline  
post #14 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 06:46 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,671
                     
Post

I only listed all those tournaments to show what opportunities she had. Re-reading the post, it clearly seems to say she LOST all those tournaments, which certainly isn't true. I'd edit the thread, but I can't seem to figure out how to. Computers are strange.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #15 of 22 (permalink) Old Oct 14th, 2001, 09:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 137
 
Post

i think it would've been more sportsman like of her to give some sort of comment to hingis' injury
in her interview, all she could talk about was her number one spot
i dun think sayin sth bout hingis' injury like get well soon or whatever would be that hard
polexia is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome