Non GS Points too high? or should QP go? - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 08:40 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: nowhere
Posts: 407
                     
Non GS Points too high? or should QP go?

I think they are.

Maggie Maleeva fell from vying for the top 10 to struggling to stay in the top 20 after Moscow fell off.

Pattys ranking has dived from 18 to 28 after Zurich.

Jelena Dokic is now in the top 15.


Based on form this year, Maggie and Patty are now ranked about where they should be.

Very few people would honestly believe Dokic should be in the top 20, let alone the top 15 on her form this year, yet there she is and it is because of ONE tournament

I think they should either lower the points for non-GS tournaments or drop the quality points altogether in non-GS tournaments.

What do you Think?

Of Course I'm out of my Mind



It's freakin dark and scary in there
Instant is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 08:41 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Day-Dreaming
Posts: 7,821
                     
no.


"You Worry About Your Jump Rope and Yourself!" -Coral on Battle of the Sexes 2




Running for the cliff again...
Rtael is offline  
post #3 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 08:41 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Day-Dreaming
Posts: 7,821
                     
Besides, the reason Dokic is staying up there is because of her high seedings up until this point in the year where she could get byes or easy players in the early rounds....


"You Worry About Your Jump Rope and Yourself!" -Coral on Battle of the Sexes 2




Running for the cliff again...
Rtael is offline  
post #4 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 08:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: on a rock
Posts: 5,755
                     
Oh my gosh. They have already raised the points for GS tournaments already. Should we make it so that non-GS tournaments just don't count at all.

In fact........ why even have a WTA tour?
starr is offline  
post #5 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 08:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 529
                     
Actually, I think that the GS points should drop. GS are 'overrated' in the litteral sense of the word. We don't need number one's who play only 8 to 10 tournaments.
XMan is offline  
post #6 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 09:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,898
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by XMan
Actually, I think that the GS points should drop. GS are 'overrated' in the litteral sense of the word. We don't need number one's who play only 8 to 10 tournaments.
I agree. Women's GSs are not at the same level of competition as in men's tennis. But they are considered just as important.
Warrior is online now  
post #7 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 09:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,673
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Instant
Very few people would honestly believe Dokic should be in the top 20, let alone the top 15 on her form this year, yet there she is and it is because of ONE tournament.
These four tournaments had a lot to do with her ranking
Code:
2002-11-04 156 QF WTA Champs 
2003-04-28 119 SF Warsaw 
2003-03-17 118 QF Miami 
2003-04-07 100 QF Charleston
The question is not 'should she be ranked #14?' The question is, 'is there any one ranked below her who should be ranked above her?'

The answer is no.

The only reason the rankings exist is to have a fair way of seeding tournaments.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.

Last edited by Volcana; Oct 20th, 2003 at 12:55 AM.
Volcana is offline  
post #8 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 10:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,315
                     
Why do we have non-GS tournaments, anyhow? Wouldn't we all be better off getting rid of all them and just having those 8 weeks a year? Then we wouldn't have people complaining about the season being too long, either.

You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.
disposablehero is offline  
post #9 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 20th, 2003, 12:03 AM
Senior Member
 
cheo23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: IN,USA
Posts: 4,254
                     
Well We need like Tier 1 and Tier 2 Tournaments..but I agree they should kinda lower those Quality points..and the Grand Slams are very important and backbone of the WTA Tour.
cheo23 is offline  
post #10 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 20th, 2003, 12:07 AM
HAND SCRAPED
 
-Sonic-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 7,155
                     
I dunno, wasn't Dokic's quality points a big factor in her getting that huge point haul last week? If they went higher, she would be ranked higher. She also got a good few Bye's in the past year, so needing to do less to get those QF's etc.

I think maybe the double quality points at Grand Slams are a bit excessive. Maybe x 1.5 instead of x 2.
-Sonic- is offline  
post #11 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 20th, 2003, 12:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,315
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheo23
the Grand Slams are very important and backbone of the WTA Tour.
The WTA is in a pretty sorry state if the "backbone" of the tour isn't even part of the tour.

You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.
disposablehero is offline  
post #12 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 20th, 2003, 12:34 AM
Senior Member
 
~ The Leopard ~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kissing my little Lolita
Posts: 13,105
                     
Maybe we should just have one big tournament somewhere. None of us want to watch tennis live anyway.

(Sarcasm alert.)

Vin, kvinder og sang
~ The Leopard ~ is offline  
post #13 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 20th, 2003, 12:51 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: yAkUlt lAnd
Posts: 1,334
                     
If you think of it this way... put players rank 100-108.. put them in one tournament... so i guess that the one who goes deeper into the tournament gets more points rite, thus having a better ranking no matter who she defeats.

For dokic... I thikn that its fair enought where she is ranked... after playing about 28 tournaments. ms Venus needs to play only 6 to be ranked 6-8??

Well anyway, just check the Porche Race thing, sometimes its a good comparison to the current ranking...
7~LV3 is offline  
post #14 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 20th, 2003, 12:55 AM
Senior Member
 
~ The Leopard ~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kissing my little Lolita
Posts: 13,105
                     
The quality points often seem to me to give an intuitively better ranking than the official ranking does.

Vin, kvinder og sang
~ The Leopard ~ is offline  
post #15 of 19 (permalink) Old Oct 20th, 2003, 12:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,673
                     
dh - I'm not sure you made your point, so I'll spell it out for our lesser lights. The Slams are in NO WAY part of, or controlled by, the WTA.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.

Last edited by Volcana; Oct 20th, 2003 at 01:03 AM.
Volcana is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome