5 Sets - TennisForum.com

View Poll Results: SHOULD WTA PLAY BEST OF 5 SETS
YES 25 40.98%
NO 36 59.02%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 10:36 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 883
                     
5 Sets

I want to know why women do not play five sets in grand slam and end of year finals and SF and all fed cup matches. They are all fit and strong and should all be able to last for the best of 3-5 set match.
In my mind women want equal prize money for wimbledom and the french. but they do not do the same amount of work as the men and so in all of the slams the men should get more prize money then them.

I think most tennis fans would enjoy the women to play a best of 5 sets. And cant uderstand the reason for it in the SF and final.

And here how i think a best of 5 sets would have helped for better matches this year.

The Aussie open
Venus and Serena I think would have gone to 5 sets this year (best of five would help to bring out the best tennis out of them both)

The french
Kim was starting to get over her nervos in the second set so would have been ready to play her real game in the third it may have made too little to late but least you would of seen a set of good tennis.

Wimbledon
The only place where i think 5 sets would hinder the match becuses of the injury. So i will go to the year before and please see the reaso i put for aussie open.

US OPEN
please see french

So not only do people get there money worth and there would be no more 40 mins grandslam final. But it makes for much better tennis matches. more chance of classic matches and better come backs
SO PLEASE IF ANY ONE FROM THE WTA IS READING THIS TAKE NOTE
cool bird is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 10:39 PM
I'm so current, I'm tomorrow.
 
AjdeNate!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The City by the Lake.
Posts: 49,163
                     
I think the Tour Champs should be best of 5 like it used to be.
AjdeNate! is offline  
post #3 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 10:41 PM
Senior Member
 
shap_half's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 14,701
                     
What would have happened to Hingis at the Australian Open final if she had to play best of out of five sets against Capriati!!???
shap_half is offline  
post #4 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 10:41 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Venus Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 11,233
                     
I think both the men and women should be best of three from the First Round to the Fourth Round, then Best of Five for the both of them from the Quarterfinals on.

QUEEN VEE


Good Luck: RENA, MATTEK, HAYNES, GULLICKSON, HARKLEROAD, RUBIN, GRANVILLE, LEE-WATERS, SCHNYDER, JACKSON, PERRY, KING, SUGIYAMA, PIERCE, TULYAGANOVA, IVANOVIC, KUZNETSOVA, MOLIK, DANIILIDOU, MEDINA GARRIGUES, PETROVA, PENNETTA, GOLOVIN, PEER, LI, SCHIAVONE, RAZZANO, ZVONAREVA, SPREM, SREBOTNIK, VINCI, & SAFINA
Venus Forever is offline  
post #5 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 10:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,614
                     
I'd rather say no, because women are physically not able to play many 5 set matches.
I wouldn't mind if indeed it returned for the Championships final, as it would make that match different from all other again.

However in the years best of 5 matches were played in the Championships finals only once in history was the winner different from the one that would have won looking only at the scores of the first 3 sets!
great smash is offline  
post #6 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 10:44 PM
Senior Member
 
ToeTag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,307
                     
I'd like to see some b/5 as well...even if it was changed to 4 games instead of 6,which the tour experimented with a while back at a minor tournament.
ToeTag is offline  
post #7 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 10:45 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 883
                     
thats a good idea venus forever
cool bird is offline  
post #8 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 10:45 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 8,260
                     
I think the final for grand slam and year end champ should be five sets, but that's it

FWTT
-Oldest game in wtaboard, started in April 2000 even before wtaworld is born.
-You can create your own player, making their own name, making their personality.
-Some player has been playing for more than 10 years


visit this thread for more detail
http://www.tennisforum.com/76-fwtt/397111-2011-official-fwtt-information-thread-new-players-enter-here.html
wongqks is offline  
post #9 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 11:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YavimayaValley
Posts: 908
                     
Are you insane? They barely can play through a 3set match. In 5 sets the quality of the tennis would be so bad we would all be sick of tennis forever. If the WTA girls get any fitter or stronger they will turn into freaks
Fyndh0rnElf is offline  
post #10 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 11:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,898
                     
If you think about it, the women have a pretty good deal right now at Wimby and FO. They get like 98% of the prize money that the men get, while playing only best of three and spending half the amount of time on court as the men. So it would seem not really worth it for them to start playing best of 5 sets, just for that last little 2% increase in money. Or at the AO and USO, where the money is already equal, why would the women want to do more work for the same money? I'm not saying it's not a good idea, but nobody in the WTA is going to favor it.
vogus is offline  
post #11 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 11:18 PM
Team WTAworld
Superskyderen
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ehhh...
Posts: 13,888
                     
I used to like the five set match at the Year End Championships but I can understand why it isn't around any more... It's at the end of a pretty hard season - the players are tired, very tired indeed!! It would be nice to see a five set match somewhere in the season though...

So long, signature...
Princess Fiona is offline  
post #12 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 11:22 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Martian Willow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Below the stars.
Posts: 6,695
                     
...the only good thing about playing five sets would be to wipe out the argument about prize money...that's not the reason the women get less...but it's brought up all the time and gets in the way...I don't think it would improve the tennis though...I do like VeNuS FoReVeRs' idea though...five set semis' and finals (with a tie break in the fifth, maybe) would be interesting...
Martian Willow is offline  
post #13 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 18th, 2003, 11:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Jericho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: my own little world
Posts: 6,804
                     
Or how about best of 3 no tiebreaks in any set, would that make a difference?
Does anyone have a list of women's matches that were best of 5?



Jericho is offline  
post #14 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 12:00 AM
Plainclothes Division
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Park, CO
Posts: 6,323
                     
I say a resounding no. For the year-end finale, maybe, but other than that, no. I say the reverse; that they should reduce the men's matches to best of 3. There are almost no 5 set matches that include 5 great sets of tennis. There are few that include 5 close sets, and that is usually because the serve dominates.

And the argument that the men do more work because they play best of 5 is a complete fallacy. It's built upon the extremely faulty premise that all sets are equal, and that sets are the measure of work. "Work" in tennis isn't accurately measured by the number of sets played, or number of games, or even number of points. Nor is it measured by time spent on court. It's measured by the actually playing of the points.

I'll give an example. Player A plays 3 points. He serves 3 aces, each of which take about a second. Add in the 25 seconds between points (of which the men typically use the full allotment) , and he's on court a total of 53 seconds from the start of the first point to the conclusion of the 3rd. Player B plays one point, which involves a rally. Let's assume it takes just under 20 seconds total (about 17-18). Player A has played 3 times as many points. He's been on court 3 times as long. Has he done 3 times the work? No, because his total actual work was 3 seconds. Player B has actually worked about 6 times as much.

Granted, such an example is a bit extreme. But the general point holds. Players who have to work harder for their points are working harder than those who tend to win more points outright with the serve. And I think everyone will agree that women get very few quick points as a rule, where there tend to be many more of them on the men's side. Statistics show that the serve is becoming increasingly dominant in the men's game, including a higher incidence of tiebreaks reached without a single service break.

What this underscores is that there is a difference between the sets being played, rendering a direct comparison on the basis of # of sets (or games) played invalid. It's like comparing Joe, who spent 5 hours at his office, with Bob, who spent 3 hours at his. Who did more work? You don't know, until you actually look at what they did. If Bob is industrious, and Joe is lazy, Bob could easily do more work.

That's been the case with tennis through the years. The last time I examined a full Wimbledon field, I compared the two main draws (men's and women's singles) on the basis of actual work done. The media were using the AELTC's stats of # of sets and games played as the basis of saying that the men were doing the lion's share of the work, and that the women should consider themselves fortunate to be getting what they are. But, on closer (and more accurate) inspection, it turned out that the men, despite all of the extra sets and games they played, did only about 40% of the total work. And this was in a year with a higher than usual number of 5 set men's matches, and a lower than usual # of women's 3 set matches.

What it boils down to is the mentality of the players. Those who play best of 5 sets have developed a BO5 mentality. You see a lot of "energy conservation" in those matches. Players will do anything from tanking return games, either after securing a break, or going down 30-0 early, by just slapping at their returns, to tanking entire sets (extremely common in the old days). Players tend to not give their all on every single point, or in every single game, or in some extremes, even in every single set.
The women have the BO3 mentality. They tend to put 100% into every single point. Thus, they are putting more work into each set, each game, each point. This makes for more entertaining points, and more entertaining tennis. If they (slams) would change the men to best of 3, they would be packing the same amount of tennis they now play over 3-4 hours into less than 2 hours. Much more "bang for the buck" for viewers. This would only add to the appeal of tennis.

So, I'm opposed to BO5 matches on principle. I don't want to see the women switch to BO5, which doesn't give you more great matches, but instead, for every quality BO5 match, there are dozens of dull ones that are at least 50% longer than they need to be.
Brian Stewart is offline  
post #15 of 36 (permalink) Old Oct 19th, 2003, 12:01 AM
Senior Member
 
~ The Leopard ~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kissing my little Lolita
Posts: 13,105
                     
One thing I've never understood is why the grrls seem to find it tougher to play five sets than the guys. It's a matter of endurance, not strength. Usually you'd expect women to have more endurance than men, not less. Cf marathon swimming, etc.

I think that both sexes should have the same format, whether it means the women playing some five-set matches, the men playing fewer five-set matches in slams, whatever it takes.

Vin, kvinder og sang
~ The Leopard ~ is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome