Tashkent cancelled?........ - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 (permalink) Old May 12th, 2003, 09:52 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 368
 
Tashkent cancelled?........

man, there are less and less tournaments to be played on the tour,
is it gonna get worse next year....
niceman is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 (permalink) Old May 12th, 2003, 11:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In an Iglo in Canada
Posts: 4,404
                     
it is sort of good, and sort of bad that there are less tournie.
Good because top players need rest, and when they meet they will be rested to give it their all, also there is more chances of them meeting if their is less tournaments, they will be playing more the same of tournies.
Bad because fans from other countries don't get to see these players. Lesser ranked players won't have a greatchance of winning tournie, because their will be less, and they would have to play more tournies where top players are. so if u like some players ranked below, u would hate to see them get smoke 6-0 6-0 by a top player and maybe not even be able to enter tournie because of their ranking.
CanadianBoy21 is offline  
post #3 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 01:11 AM
Senior Member
 
F-R-E-A-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: With Foxy!
Posts: 20,740
                     
Well said SuperDevil! Time will tell the story everybody!
F-R-E-A-K is offline  
 
post #4 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 01:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Catskill Mtns., NY, USA
Posts: 1,564
                     
SuperDevil:

The problem is that most of the tournaments getting cancelled aren't the ones that top players play. I don't think Tashkent had one Top 20 player in the past four years; Porto may have had one in ASV the year she played.

The lower ranked players need these tournaments to get them enough prize money to keep their WTA membership.
Ted of Teds Tennis is offline  
post #5 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 01:44 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mexico
Posts: 16,419
                     
I agree. There seems to be so little tier III's IV's and V's now
rated_next is offline  
post #6 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 01:46 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Day-Dreaming
Posts: 7,902
                     
get a fucking clue, if the top players don't want to overplay themselves, then they shouldn't overplay themselves....it has NOTHING to do with the number of fucking tournies that they are ABLE to enter.... geeze....and losing tournies is bad especially in areas where the tennis fans aren't oo numerous because it can get more tennis fans and more people playing tennis (hopefully!) And it's also bad because the lower-ranked players NEED these tournies to ever get a chance to play...the less tournaments there are, the higher ranked the players will be that enter them thus leaving less room for lower ranked players

"You Worry About Your Jump Rope and Yourself!" -Coral on Battle of the Sexes 2
(1/20/17) Just discovered this gem in my private messages from 2006:
Who is Rtael?
This guy Rtael ,brainless and ignorant, is one of the most obnoxious, arrogant and coward guys whos has been a pest in this forum for years now.Given the new anti-bully policy he'll probably be expelled soon. Observe how he tries to rally and gang others against you. Mean people like him shouldn't be allowed here. And all because he "doesn't like your attitude"!!
**Everyone should consider themselves warned!**
Rtael is offline  
post #7 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 02:11 AM
Senior Member
 
Mateo Mathieu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Piccadilly Circus
Posts: 61,806
                     
Also, it's so stupid to put in middle of grass season along with Vienna on clay


Inspiration is for amateurs

Mateo Mathieu is offline  
post #8 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 02:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In the sky with Miss Bovina
Posts: 3,702
                     
About damn time that Tashkent got cancelled... that tournament is your definition of dead weight.
Leena is offline  
post #9 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 02:14 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In the sky with Miss Bovina
Posts: 3,702
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rtael
get a fucking clue, if the top players don't want to overplay themselves, then they shouldn't overplay themselves....it has NOTHING to do with the number of fucking tournies that they are ABLE to enter.... geeze....and losing tournies is bad especially in areas where the tennis fans aren't oo numerous because it can get more tennis fans and more people playing tennis (hopefully!) And it's also bad because the lower-ranked players NEED these tournies to ever get a chance to play...the less tournaments there are, the higher ranked the players will be that enter them thus leaving less room for lower ranked players
That's what challengers and qualifying are for.

The best players should play the best players... and the scrubs can play the scrubs, and hopefully work their way up.
Leena is offline  
post #10 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 05:01 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 368
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leena
That's what challengers and qualifying are for.

The best players should play the best players... and the scrubs can play the scrubs, and hopefully work their way up.
actually that's what Tier I and Tier II events are for.......
Tier III events are mostly jumping boards,

but Tashkent is Tier IV...........
Tier IV and Tier V are for lower ranked youngsters
who possess the potentials to play for points and exposure,
or for veterans to come back for.....
why would they want to cancel this event..
i understand it's bad scheduling,
but it can still fit well along with
Dubia/Doha periods...............

what's the difference b/w winning Tier V and
winning both 25K+H and 75K+H challenger events?
you actually get less prize money and points for WTA events,
u know, players can just play challenger and high Tier qualies
and get high in the ranking,
but low tier events are there for a reason,

maybe some people dont really care
about people who are ranked lower than 20,
or even lower than TOP 10.......hell, lower than Serena or Venus,
but that doesnt mean lower ranked players dont exist,
so absolutely disagree with the way WTA organizes the events,

how can you possibly add bonus money to Rome,
get all those prize money up for high Tier events,
and promote Antwerps Warsaw etc. for top players
while canceling low tier events so those
lower ranked players cant have their ends meet,
that just doesnt make sense to me.


lower Tier events are there coz they need be.....

Last edited by niceman; May 13th, 2003 at 07:30 AM.
niceman is offline  
post #11 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 05:12 AM
Senior Member
 
Mateo Mathieu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Piccadilly Circus
Posts: 61,806
                     
Sandrine Testud commited it in two years ago but withdrew...


Inspiration is for amateurs

Mateo Mathieu is offline  
post #12 of 17 (permalink) Old May 13th, 2003, 07:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: this celluloid dream
Posts: 4,078
                     
Good. We don't need the number of events we have now. They aren't all profitable, and they aren't all viable. So why should we have the ones that aren't?
King Lindsay is offline  
post #13 of 17 (permalink) Old May 17th, 2003, 11:59 AM
Senior Member
 
spiceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 51,525
                     
...and wait til the end of season with the SARS thing Shangai Tier II is virtually out and I doubt Bali & Pattaya City will be played either.
At least things look better in the last days for Toronto and Tokyo
spiceboy is offline  
post #14 of 17 (permalink) Old May 17th, 2003, 01:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: this celluloid dream
Posts: 4,078
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiceboy
...and wait til the end of season with the SARS thing Shangai Tier II is virtually out and I doubt Bali & Pattaya City will be played either.
At least things look better in the last days for Toronto and Tokyo
i think those events will be fine, SARS or not.
King Lindsay is offline  
post #15 of 17 (permalink) Old May 17th, 2003, 01:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Experimentee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 13,064
                     
Thats too bad. There arent many tournaments in that part of the world, and it was great that fans there got to see some tennis, but now thats been taken away.
Experimentee is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome