Anyone who knows about TENNIS STROKES on CLAY in here - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old May 6th, 2003, 03:06 AM Thread Starter
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 34,696
                     
Exclamation Anyone who knows about TENNIS STROKES on CLAY in here

This is a quote I came across in the men's tennis forum, and there has been an extensive argument over in that thread already, so I thought I'll ask for other people's opinions here. Those who have played tennis on clay, those who play regularly or those who coach tennis would provide more insightful answers, I'm assuming, so please post if you are one. Here's the comment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ys
Claycourt perfect player MUST have a single-handed backhand.
I have never ever heard a pro player nor commentator admit to such a theory. If you have or if it is true, please tell me.
Sam L is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old May 6th, 2003, 03:11 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Middle Earth
Posts: 1,003
                     
I don't think it's true. It's just that most of the Spanish clay courters play one-handed that it is believed that.

Actually, I think that one-handed players have an advantage on grass, where the ball bounces so low, but I don't think on clay it's that important.
Gandalf is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old May 6th, 2003, 03:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In the sky with Miss Bovina
Posts: 3,702
                     
If anything, I'd think having a 2-handed backhand would be best on clay. The court is slower, so the lack of reach isn't as important... and it's easier to handle high balls with 2 hands.

Anyways... Courier, Bruguera, Moya, Kafelnikov, Agassi... more than half of the past RG champions have had 2-handed backhands... so I don't think it's that important, of even matters at all.
Leena is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old May 6th, 2003, 01:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Va,USA
Posts: 255
                     
If a player needs a one-handed backhand on clay, how do you explain Chris Evert's record? Her results seem to be the ultimate rebuttel to that theory.
Jane is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old May 6th, 2003, 02:24 PM
Senior Member
 
moby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,403
                     
i think the reason behind this theory is that one handers can hit through the ball more and thus they can add a lot more topspin and make the ball bounce uncomfortably higher.

A single flow'r he sent me, since we met./All tenderly his messenger he chose;
Deep-hearted, pure, with scented dew still wet - One perfect rose.
I knew the language of the floweret;/'My fragile leaves,' it said, 'his heart enclose.'
Love long has taken for his amulet/One perfect rose.
Why is it no one ever sent me yet/One perfect limousine, do you suppose?
Ah no, it's always just my luck to get/One perfect rose.
moby is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old May 6th, 2003, 02:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 377
                     
The theory is not correct. It's not just that there are many male and female players who have been successful over the years on clay but the theory about pace given by ys is not correct either - there is more to energy transfer than rotational speed. I don't think there is an advantage in either 1 or 2 handed backhands. But here is my theory...

to be the best on clay you have to have a BIG forehand (which is kind of a cop out I know because 80% of players these days have big forehands, but there you go!)
Scorch is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old May 6th, 2003, 11:29 PM Thread Starter
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 34,696
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scorch
The theory is not correct. It's not just that there are many male and female players who have been successful over the years on clay but the theory about pace given by ys is not correct either - there is more to energy transfer than rotational speed. I don't think there is an advantage in either 1 or 2 handed backhands. But here is my theory...

to be the best on clay you have to have a BIG forehand (which is kind of a cop out I know because 80% of players these days have big forehands, but there you go!)
Good point. Also I read an article recently posted by Brian Stewart about the differences between open-stance shots and closed-stance shots. How the closed-stance generates more pace and gives a 'whiplash' effect. Perhaps, the fact that so many two-handed backhand players hit with open-stance these days is the reason why, as it is rare for a one-hander to hit open-stance. Anyway, thanks for your inputs guys!
Sam L is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome