2002 Wimbledon women's final TV ratings twice that of the entire event! - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 8 (permalink) Old Feb 26th, 2003, 09:29 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hollywood and other classified areas
Posts: 7,125
                     
2002 Wimbledon women's final TV ratings twice that of the entire event!

-----
from MSNBC.COM
----------

"The rain-slogged 2002 Wimbledon averaged a 2.1 rating for its 15 telecasts, 22 percent lower than 2001, and 36 percent lower than 2000. But the Saturday broadcast, featuring the women’s final between sisters Serena and Venus Williams, drew a 4.6 rating — 31 percent higher than 2001."

----------

The ratings for the women's final was over double the ratings for the men and the entire tournament.

The ratings for the men is dropping while the chart on the women is steadily rising.
Thanks to V&S of course.

Tee Rexx
Chairman, Williams Tennis Association
Tennis is a game ... Have fun with it!
TeeRexx is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 8 (permalink) Old Feb 26th, 2003, 09:33 PM
Don't mess with Texas!
 
Jarrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 5,716
                     
Uh maybe it was because is was the FINALS. Like saying wow the superbowl got more viewers than the regular playoff games.

"Gee, Quinn... I hope that little foray of yours into Geekland just now is the result of heat exhaustion, and not an unpleasant side effect of all that tutoring. I mean, you're not turning into a brain, are you?" -- Sandi

Jarrett is offline  
post #3 of 8 (permalink) Old Feb 26th, 2003, 09:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: You bet!
Posts: 1,992
 
With all due respect, Tee, I think your comprehension of these stats leaves something to be desired.
Iconoclast is offline  
post #4 of 8 (permalink) Old Feb 26th, 2003, 09:37 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hollywood and other classified areas
Posts: 7,125
                     
So, why weren't the men's ratings as high.
Secondly, finals rarely double the ratings of previous rounds or the entire event.

Tee Rexx
Chairman, Williams Tennis Association
Tennis is a game ... Have fun with it!
TeeRexx is offline  
post #5 of 8 (permalink) Old Feb 26th, 2003, 11:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,098
                     
it really does have to do with the sisters. like i said before about them making the ratings. You can either be for them, or against them. and you have to watch them to root for them, and you have to watch them to root against them! either way, the sisters will be drawing in the ratings!

Follow Me! @CedricEarl
SerenaSlam is offline  
post #6 of 8 (permalink) Old Feb 27th, 2003, 12:29 AM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Shangri-La
Posts: 35,371
                     
No American men survived to the round of 16. Are we meant to be surprised about these ratings?

Light of the Seven: Himalayas, Gobi, Baikal, Taiga, Steppe, Alps, Aurora
Sam L is offline  
post #7 of 8 (permalink) Old Feb 27th, 2003, 12:46 AM
Plainclothes Division
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Park, CO
Posts: 6,323
                     
That 2.1 average for all of the telecasts included the women's finals, and women's semis, which were also significantly above the overall average. If you take them out of the mix, the remaining telecasts drop under a 2.0 average.

The funny part about the ratings is the networks getting their comuppance for a decade of jingoism, with NBC being among the most nationalistic. Now, faced with a near future of most grand slam men's finals having no Americans, they are trying to backtrack. It used to be different. Fans used to tune in to watch the likes of Borg, Lendl, Wilander, Edberg, Becker, even if they weren't playing Americans. There might be a slight dropoff in ratings vs a match with Americans, but it wasn't as steep as it is now.

The networks have only themselves to blame, after a decade of sowing "only Americans matter". Reap and weep, baby.
Brian Stewart is offline  
post #8 of 8 (permalink) Old Feb 27th, 2003, 07:10 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hollywood and other classified areas
Posts: 7,125
                     
The issue is not just about the playing ability of the new American men.
They just aren't that interesting. They are downright dull because they took after Pete. He was the only guy on earth who could date movie stars and still be dull.
When Andre goes, so goes American men's tennis.

Tee Rexx
Chairman, Williams Tennis Association
Tennis is a game ... Have fun with it!
TeeRexx is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome