Will Serena get a cover on Sports Illistrated? - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 02:07 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,007
                     
Will Serena get a cover on Sports Illistrated?

She sure as heck deserves it. In fact so does Pat Summit and the UConn womens basketball team. They sure cant complain about overexposure. Neither Williams hasnt made the cover since 99. They plastered Tiger woods on their cover when he won his "Tiger slam". I want a Serena/Venus cover
Serendy Willick is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 02:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,943
                     
Not gonna happen. The Super Bowl was this weekend, and the outcome was surprise to most 'experts'. That'll be the cover.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #3 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 02:13 PM
Senior Member
 
brickhousesupporter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: it is all about location
Posts: 15,728
                     
Suprise to most experts. I guess I am not like most experts. BTW did anyone see Sereana at the Superbowl, they even interviewed her.

I am not conceited, I am just convinced
brickhousesupporter is offline  
 
post #4 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 02:17 PM
country flag RAA
Senior Member
 
RAA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,031
                     
well, not this week she won't , not with the Superbowl...
RAA is offline  
post #5 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 02:18 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,007
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by brickhousesupporter
Suprise to most experts. I guess I am not like most experts. BTW did anyone see Sereana at the Superbowl, they even interviewed her.
What?! When? I was watching it the whole time, when did they show her?
Serendy Willick is offline  
post #6 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 02:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 135
                     
i found this interesting article on the net


If you are a woman, there are only three ways to get the sports world to notice you:

1. Strip down to your panties and bra and wrestle over beer.

2. Play crappy tennis but look hot pulling the second ball out of your briefs.

3. Tweak Hootie's nose.

Break records? Win at unthinkable rates? Push the envelope of female athletic achievement? Forget it, sweetheart! How 'bout a boob job?

Exhibit A: The Connecticut women's basketball team wins its 55th straight game last Saturday, breaking the alltime women's record. But unless you happened to get the feed from the Connecticut Public Television network, you couldn't see the game live. ESPN will show men fishing heroically, and Fox will show a man trying to outrun a giraffe, but televise one of the landmark events in women's hoops history? Sorry, baby, you haven't come a long way.

Exhibit B: Tennessee's women's basketball genius Pat Summitt quietly wins her 800th game on Tuesday of last week, becoming the first woman and only the fourth Division I coach to do it. Nationally, it made all the splash of a marshmallow landing in a bog. When North Carolina's Dean Smith hit 800 in 1994, there was so much coverage, you'd have thought he'd just returned from Mars.

"I'm surprised she hasn't gotten more attention for it," says no less than John Wooden, the former UCLA coach who is one of Summitt's biggest fans. "She's only 50. She could win many, many more games." In fact if she coaches as long as Smith did -- until she's 66 -- and keeps winning at her current pace, she'd blow by Smith like he was roadkill and wind up with more than 1,200 wins. Hey, maybe then she'd get on Live with Regis and Kelly!

Exhibit C: At the Australian Open, Serena Williams tries to win her fourth consecutive major -- the Serena Slam, if you will -- and America barely looks up from Joe Millionaire. Of course when Tiger Woods completed his Tiger Slam at the Masters in 2001, a national holiday was nearly declared.

You remember Tiger, right? Used to be Most Dominating Golfer in the World? Not anymore. That title belongs to Exhibit D: Annika Sorenstam, who is coming off one of the most brain-bending seasons since Byron Nelson in 1945. The Ice Queen of Sweden won more than half her starts last year, 13 victories in 25 tournaments around the world. Tiger in 2002? He won six of 22 starts.

You mean you didn't see her on the cover of TIME? Or this magazine? Or Golf Digest? Or Golf? Or on the Today show? Or Letterman or Leno? No? Maybe that's because it never happened. "If Tiger had a year like Annika," says LPGA player Jill McGill, "they'd reschedule sunsets for him."

Sorenstam's agent, Mark Steinberg, also happens to represent Tiger. "She and I talk about it all the time," Steinberg says. "She'd love to have more opportunities, but what can you do?" Last year Tiger did whip Sorenstam in one department. He earned more than $60 million in endorsements to her $2.5 million. Hey, Annika, ever tried a short tennis skirt?

And forget anybody having heard of Exhibit E: Paula Radcliffe. All she did in October was run a marathon in 2 hours, 17 minutes, not only shattering the women's world record but also narrowing to 12 minutes the gap between the men's and women's best times. That means, in the past 40 years, women have improved their record by more than an hour and men by nine minutes. (And to think they used to warn women not to run because their uteruses might fall out.)

All of this crinkles the nose of Exhibit F: Gail Goestenkors, coach of the No. 1 women's basketball team in the land, Duke, which also happened to have the No. 1-ranked men's team last week. The Duke men have sold out every home game since 1990. The Duke women have never sold out.

It doesn't bother the unsquashable Coach G. "We play for ourselves," she says, "for our own excellence." In fact the only opponent who really scares her is George W. Bush. "I'm afraid he's going to change Title IX," she says of the law that requires equal opportunity for men and women to participate in sports at schools that receive federal funding. "He's talking about making [compliance] voluntary. That would be a travesty."

She would know. In seventh grade her school did not have a girls' track team, so she had to run on the boys' squad. The guys hated her for it, and when she'd get into the starting blocks, they would comment on her butt. Or the way she looked in her shorts. "We can't lose Title IX," she says, "because I know what girls would have to go back to."

True, Title IX has caused brutal cuts in men's sports over the past 30 years. But women suffered for 100 years without it. As Wooden says, "The problem with Title IX is that it started way too late. I wouldn't want anything to happen to that program."

A piece of advice, Mr. President: Don't touch Title IX, because the only thing women resent more than being ignored is being denied.

Issue date: January 27, 2003

Sports Illustrated senior writer Rick Reilly pens the weekly Life of Reilly column in the magazine.

Posted by Mad-about Venus: So true

To me Pam is a frustraded person who needs to live with the fact that she never won a Slam during her pathetic career, and she was never a threat to anybody. She resents the fact that players can get to places she always dreamed about. Unfortunatelly she has a microphone in her mouth and that allows her to spread a whole bunch of BS. That gives her joy. Someone should tell her to stick that micro somewhere else, she would get even more joy that way.
frenchvee is offline  
post #7 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 02:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,156
                     
Quote:
"If Tiger had a year like Annika," says LPGA player Jill McGill, "they'd reschedule sunsets for him."
That's hilarious.

I have no idea what it will take to get Serena or any other woman on the cover of SI or ESPN, The Magazine. The world is still run by men you know and a lot of men don't like strong women (either physically strong or mentally strong). That's why there is always so much talk about "lesbians in sports." These men want a reason for these women to be so good at what they do so if they are "dykes" then that's why. Anna K. is so popular because she's a cupcake Barbie doll, not a real athlete. She's non-threatening to them and therefore she gets all the attention.

I have no idea what to say or what can be done about the situation but if I see Serena on the cover of SI or ESPN, the Mag I'll probably faint in the supermarket. In fact, inside the magazines the bigger of the tennis stories will most likely be about Andre, not Serena.
miranda_lou is offline  
post #8 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 02:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,843
                     
Is it just me, or is there a disgusting lack of coverage given that the Australian Open gave us two of the MOST SPECIAL EVENTS EVER in sport? Not just women's sport, SPORT full stop. You've got the absolute domination of a player who is potentially going to be seen as a great in the future completing the first four-in-a-row for nearly a DECADE, and at the same time you've got Martina N proving what a legend she is by becoming the oldest player ever to win a Slam title.

And from what I've seen, no sports publication is treating it as anything different
sartrista7 is offline  
post #9 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 03:01 PM
Senior Member
 
brickhousesupporter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: it is all about location
Posts: 15,728
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by Luci
What?! When? I was watching it the whole time, when did they show her?
they did an interview with her during the pregame show.

I am not conceited, I am just convinced
brickhousesupporter is offline  
post #10 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 03:19 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 238
 
Serena was on the cover of ESPN the Magazine a few months back!
Roseie is offline  
post #11 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 03:28 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: New York City
Posts: 10,386
 
SI is doing an article on Serena about her run last year and now that she has won the aussie, its even more compelling. Whether they will give her the cover on not....

VENUS. ANA, TAY TAY. NICOLE. LAURA. KONJUH. MADISON

SERENA. MUGU. VIKA. PETKO. CARO. TIMEA. SVETA. HEATHER. KAIA. TAMIRA. FLAVIA. GEORGI. COCO. LUCIE, SLOANE. PENG. SORANA. ALICIA. JAEDA. CICI. ANETT. DANKA. DONNA. FRANCOISE.

GONE BUT NOT FORGOTTEN. SHENAY. DINARA. GISELA. SPREM.
BK4ever is offline  
post #12 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 03:47 PM
 
harloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wonderland Arts Society
Posts: 19,079
                     
If I'm not mistaken Anna is the only women who has graced the covers of Sports Illustrated which is degrading to women's sports. SI is sending a clear message because they feel that women belong in the bedroom and kitchen.

Also think about it, the market for the magazine are men really. So why not have a hot babe who is viewed as a sex object on the cover? Maybe that's why they created SI for women, because they knew that their market wouldn't wan't to read about female atheletes. Well, I get the magazine and I like the articles, but they never really cover women's tennis too much or women's sports in general.
harloo is offline  
post #13 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 04:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,156
                     
Quote:
You've got the absolute domination of a player who is potentially going to be seen as a great in the future completing the first four-in-a-row for nearly a DECADE, and at the same time you've got Martina N proving what a legend she is by becoming the oldest player ever to win a Slam title.
Martina's "accomplishment" is hogwash!!! She was playing with a player YEARS younger against players who are only good at mixed doubles. I don't think there are very many people interested in that.

However, Serena should be on the cover of SI. What she has done since her injury at last year's AO is nothing short of phenomenal. Serena is the best in the world while Martina is just an old, pathetic broad who really should get off the tennis court.
miranda_lou is offline  
post #14 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 04:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Crazy Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Munchkin Land
Posts: 28,584
                     
frenchvee - I posted that article in a thread - which suprisingly went pretty much ignored by a board that claims to be so concerned about womens sports...

http://www.wtaworld.com/showthread.p...68#post1345868
Crazy Canuck is offline  
post #15 of 24 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2003, 05:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,943
                     
Perhaps five minutes of research BEFORE condemning Sports Illustrated was in order.

Venus and Serena have both been of the cover of SI.

Venus - Sept 15, 1997 "Party Crasher"
Serena - Sept 20, 1999 "Little SIster Big Hit"

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome