Why should the ITF follow the WTA rankings? - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 05:49 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,963
                     
Why should the ITF follow the WTA rankings?

Seriously. The only reason there IS a WTA is that a lot of women disagreed with ITF priorities. The ITF didn't change those priorities. In essence, I ask why the ITF should feel bound by an arbitrary system created by a pack of renegades?

They DO, in the case of the women, MOSTLY follow the WTA rankings. But, as far as I can see, they have no obligation to do so, and a certain incentive NOT to.

You tell me.

Why should the ITF follow the WTA rankings? In singles OR in doubles?

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 05:58 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,843
                     
because the WTA rankings are the best system that anyone currently possesses for gauging the respective abilities of the women who play in ITF events. (Yes, it's not perfect blah blah blah, but it's the only guide we have; anything else is pure subjectivity.) The ITF has no measurements of its own to guide seeding; if it doesn't use the WTA ranks, it may as well seed randomly. Which come to think of it, is essentially what Wimbledon does. (Seeding Tim Henman and Greg Rusedski artificially high, ostensibly because of 'grass court prowess'; randomly giving Lisa Raymond a top 16 seed this year even though a) Tamarine Tanasugarn was ranked higher at the time and b) had a better Wimbledon record. If you seed according to the objective rankings, you stop fuck-ups like those occurring.)
sartrista7 is offline  
post #3 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 06:01 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,963
                     
VB - But you're asking the ITF to make a concession they've refused to make for over 30 years. What does the ITF, as an organization, get out of it? From their perspective, the rankings are arbitrary and capricious. Should they contribute to this lack of reason? They feel a teams form, past accomplishments, and the surface should be taken into consideration.

They would also point out that the #1 seeded women's doubles team beat the #2 seeded team in the OZ final, a clear sign that the seedings were correct.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
 
post #4 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 06:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,843
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by Volcana
From their perspective, the rankings are arbitrary and capricious. Should they contribute to this lack of reason? They feel a teams form, past accomplishments, and the surface should be taken into consideration.
But the rankings are formulated from clearly laid out rules. Any ITF seeding system is not.
sartrista7 is offline  
post #5 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 06:15 PM
Senior Member
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 181,001
                     
ITF lost the power control a long time ago to the WTA and the ATP.

Good luck to my favs

AZARENKA

*Kuznetsova*Sharapova**Vesnina*Shvedova*Kulichkova*Kasatkina*Pavlyuchenkova*Makarova
Diatchenko*Pivovarova*Gasparyan*Leykina*Zhuk*Potapova*Pervushina*Govortsova*Vikhlyantseva*Komardina*
MINELLA TsurenkoAlize Lim*El Tabakh*Robson*Cirstea
*Juhaszova*Zanevska*Broady*Bouchard*
Cetkovska*Svitolina*
*Bellis*Soylu*Sibille*Uberalova*Eden Silva*
http://www.twitter.com/TheBoiledEgg
TheBoiledEgg is offline  
post #6 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 06:20 PM
country flag Caz
Senior Member
 
Caz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Floating around Europe.
Posts: 2,375
                     
Because they reflect the achievements of the players over a 12 month period and IMO determining where to seed the players at tournaments is the resson they are there. If they can be ignored at will, why bother to have them?

I'm not going to get into an argument over this again though, 'cos right now it's irrelevant and not worth arguing about.

Vivi & Conchita & Patricia & Paola 2004 Olympic Silver & Bronze medalists, Vivi & Anabel 2008 Olympic Silver medalists - congratulations!
Vivi & Paola ~ Holders of the record number of consecutive US Opens in the open
era!

JOIN THE CHURCH OF PAM ~
Worship the comedy that is tennis!
Caz is offline  
post #7 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 06:37 PM
The hottest straight, goth rocker on the board
Admin Emeritus
 
The Crow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 35,589
                     
As others say, it's as close to objectiveness as you can come.

If only I was sure that my head on the door was a dream
The Crow is offline  
post #8 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 06:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,315
                     
Because the WTA rankings give the most value to the ITF events. It's a symbiotic co-operation that keeps the tour from competing with the Slams. If the relationship broke down, both parties would be the worse for it.

You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.
disposablehero is offline  
post #9 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 06:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,389
                     
I think this is how they should do it

60% ranking
40% past performance
CJ07 is offline  
post #10 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 07:03 PM
The hottest straight, goth rocker on the board
Admin Emeritus
 
The Crow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 35,589
                     
And what exactly do you see as "past performance"?? Past performance at that tourney or what??

If only I was sure that my head on the door was a dream
The Crow is offline  
post #11 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 07:26 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,963
                     
TBE - The ITF hasn't lost power over the most important events, and control of the seedings is the most obvious representation of that. Again I ask, what does the ITF GET out of letting the WTA control the seedings of GS tournaments? That isn't a 'symbiotic co-operation'. That's total capitulation to rival organization.

The control is the seeding process is the only power the ITF has over the players. That and being able to throw them out of tournaments. The WTA and the ATP hold all the other cards. If youlook at the list of Wimbledon winners, you see the namen Jan Kodes. What you don't see is, that's the year the ATP struck Wimbledon, and Kodes only played caused his government said he had to.

The ITF hasn't forgotten. I doubt they've forgiven either. They've gone through some (corporate) pain and heart-ache to maintain their current (reduced) level of authority. You're asking them to give away the store. T'ain't happ'n.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #12 of 13 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 08:05 PM
Senior Member
 
TheBoiledEgg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: in Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 181,001
                     
If the ITF did their own subjective seedings, that would cause more disatisfaction rather than good.

there will me more player unrest by going that way, Just look at what happens at Wimbledon where they only do the men.

Good luck to my favs

AZARENKA

*Kuznetsova*Sharapova**Vesnina*Shvedova*Kulichkova*Kasatkina*Pavlyuchenkova*Makarova
Diatchenko*Pivovarova*Gasparyan*Leykina*Zhuk*Potapova*Pervushina*Govortsova*Vikhlyantseva*Komardina*
MINELLA TsurenkoAlize Lim*El Tabakh*Robson*Cirstea
*Juhaszova*Zanevska*Broady*Bouchard*
Cetkovska*Svitolina*
*Bellis*Soylu*Sibille*Uberalova*Eden Silva*
http://www.twitter.com/TheBoiledEgg
TheBoiledEgg is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome