'Our Kim' misses her cue to stop the Williams show - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 12:49 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7
 
'Our Kim' misses her cue to stop the Williams show

yeah it s seems like all aussies journalists are kinda m@f%^#" check this out ! i am amazed that people can write such b^*"#, i now realize how far America is...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Our Kim' misses her cue to stop the Williams show
January 24 2003
By Alan Attwood



So here we go again. Another instalment in the all-skipping, all-swinging Williams sisters show. Serena Williams will play her big sister Venus in the Australian Open women's singles final tomorrow.

They last met in the US Open final and before that at Wimbledon, which came shortly after the French Open final. Serena won the lot.

She may well win again tomorrow, having made it her new year's resolution to win every match she plays this year. But that plan - not to mention her ambitions of completing a "Serena Slam" by claiming her first Australian Open title - were nearly scuppered late yesterday afternoon by Kim Clijsters, who is officially from Belgium but quite obviously an Australian. The centre court crowd have christened her "Kimmy" and also "Kimina". A large sign hung up in the stands, facing the Williams clan: "Go Kim. Wreck 'em", it read. And in her corner was the little battler, Lleyton Hewitt. He found himself in the odd position of urging his girlfriend (Our Kim) to knock out the world No. 1, just as he had been upset on the same court last Monday.

At 5.07pm it seemed about to happen: there would be an Australian element in the Open final after all. Clijsters came out to serve, leading 5-2. A few minutes later, she held match-point. She couldn't clinch it. Then she had another. Lost that one too. Then she lost the game. And also the next one.

At 5.18, still leading at 5-4, Clijsters tried again. As a brass band oompahed outside Rod Laver Arena and seagulls circled overhead, she started with a double-fault. Then she sent down another. She drew back to 30-all, just two points from victory, but there was now a ghastly inevitability to what was unfolding.


Clijsters sent a backhand long to drop her fourth game in succession. That became five in 20 minutes when Williams - who at 21 is a year younger than Venus; a year older than Clijsters - held serve comfortably to lead for the first time in the match, which had just ticked past the two-hour mark.

In the stands Hewitt sat forward, powerless to do anything at all. He could only watch as Williams sent two winners past Clijsters to have her reeling at 0-30. A wayward Clijsters backhand brought up three match-points for the American. She only needed one. Clijsters' last shot found the net.

Williams raised her hands high, letting her racquet fly free. She seemed more incredulous than exultant about her 4-6, 6-3, 7-5 victory. Smiling broadly, she turned to the stands and approached her mother and sister Venus, who had earlier dispatched another Belgian, Justine Henin-Hardenne, much more efficiently. Aussie Kim, meanwhile, was making a rapid exit from centre court. Having twice been a point away from her first final in Melbourne, she was now out of the tournament and, with any luck, also out of earshot as Serena gushed to the crowd: "I honestly don't know how I was able to win. I kept fighting, one point at a time, and the next thing I knew the match was over."

With any luck her excitement at her great escape distracted her from some boos among the polite applause from the crowd. These reflected both disappointment at the Clijsters collapse and dissatisfaction with a prolonged break the younger Williams took early in the deciding set to have some foot blisters treated. The only one who seemed to find nothing odd with this time-out (even referee Peter Bellenger wandered over for a look) was Clijsters. Blisters can be very painful, she said later. So can losing. But less than an hour after making her centre-court exit, Clijsters was smiling and talking freely, thus confirming her eligibility for a place in the pantheon of Glorious Aussie Losers.

The only thing she regretted about the last handful of games were double-faults at 5-4, only her third and fourth for the match.

Other than that, she said, she had kept trying but just was not quite good enough.

Winners are grinners, and Williams was doing a lot of grinning as she talked about staying positive, even when trailing 1-5. She had a scare yesterday, but she is through to tomorrow's final. Her opponent will be her doubles partner of yesterday evening, sister Venus. When her place in the singles final had been booked a few hours earlier, Venus had done her best skipping-girl impression and said: "It's s-o-o-o exciting . . . I'm s-o-o-o happy." The crowd will not be quite so happy to see the final such a family affair. Kim with kangaroo could have made a charming photo. Instead, Clijsters and Hewitt and everyone else can only look on as the sisters from Florida again confront each other.



link:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...911494568.html

Last edited by STROMILE; Jan 24th, 2003 at 02:12 PM.
STROMILE is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 12:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 18,114
                     
Good article. Because it's the UNSWEETENED REALITY. Most people feel like the sport has been stolen by the sisters. No need for people to be angry and write how terrible I am for saying what many people feel. The sisters are playing the best and nobody can deny but why should deny how tired they are of that and how disappointed they are that a great player like Kim got intimidated and could not call up some great serves to put herself in control of the points from the beginning of her service games.
treufreund is offline  
post #3 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 01:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 7,274
                     
So its not about who plays with the most belief and courage and heart and will to win, its about being so despreat to have an aussie in the final and photo op with her. Pathetic.

also I love how he never mentions that after the timeout. kim won three straight games. How biased of him.

Wow, Treu, I guess you nailed it. Now you know why the williams fans get so riled up: people like you who act like the sisters have "stolen" tennis. People like you who blame serena and venus for winning as if they should go out there and lose. Sorry but thats the most pathetic and weak excuse in the book and if its true its just ugly. Its ugly of you and its ugly of whoever thinks that way.

The "unsweetened" truth is biased. The writer doesn't reveal all the facts of the match and really he sounds like he didn't want kim to win more than serena to lose. The whole sad affair is, if the situation was reversed and kim had been the one to comeback from 1 - 5 I doubt we would be seeing these stories.

The articles would be: KIMS COMEBACK QUEEN or some such.

Your opinion validates nicely what some williams fans have suspected all along about certain fans. Of course some williams fans have known all along how they are perceived in society. Funny how the fans see the williams sisters as a threat more than the other players. Kim had a good reaction to her loss, knows what she did wrong, plans on doing something about it while you and others think serena "stole" something.

Oh and the bit you wrote about how no need to write about how awful it is for you or others to feel that way... you must be kidding.

Sorry you and others may be entitled to your feelings but that doesn't mean they are okay. Also its not really a feeling than an opinion. A feeling is anger, happiness, or whatever.So really your opinion is based on some feeling like envy? hate? sadness?

well whatever it is instead of taking out your frustration on kim who blew it, you are targeting serena who DID NOTHING WRONG.

Jen had a comeback last year, but no one thought she "stole" something.

Last edited by Cybelle Darkholme; Jan 24th, 2003 at 01:15 PM.
Cybelle Darkholme is offline  
post #4 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 01:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Experimentee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 13,064
                     
Where was this article from? It annoys me that some Aussies only support Kim because shes Lleytons girlfriend. What if they break up, are they still going to like her then, and call her Aussie Kim? They interviewed some random fans on tv and they said they were just cheering Kim because she was an honorary aussie. Nothing about her game or her fighting spirit or anything. This country seems to be really desperate for a great female player and are resorting to any kind of connection, however remote it may be.
Experimentee is offline  
post #5 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 01:30 PM
Keeper of Secrets
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Speculation Land
Posts: 8,599
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by Experimentee
Where was this article from? It annoys me that some Aussies only support Kim because shes Lleytons girlfriend. What if they break up, are they still going to like her then, and call her Aussie Kim? They interviewed some random fans on tv and they said they were just cheering Kim because she was an honorary aussie. Nothing about her game or her fighting spirit or anything. This country seems to be really desperate for a great female player and are resorting to any kind of connection, however remote it may be.
totally agree!

nice post cybelle,as always.


Veelieve
Chance is offline  
post #6 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 02:11 PM Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7
 
STROMILE is offline  
post #7 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 03:57 PM
Snitch
 
Cam'ron Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Juelz Santana's bed
Posts: 16,094
                     
The Ausie's are so fucking desperate it is shameful. How sad for them. Fiend, even for you that was low. "The sport has been stolen"??????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????

To know that you feel this way make me feel so much better about the Williams success. Eat your heart out you dispicable piece of crap....

Official Gangsta rappa of the Royal Court

Will you be there?
Cam'ron Giles is offline  
post #8 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 03:59 PM
Snitch
 
Cam'ron Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Juelz Santana's bed
Posts: 16,094
                     
If I was Alicia Molik or Nicole Pratt, I would be insulted. Dokic knew what she was doing when she left that disgusting place. They can have Kim...

OMG, FIEND, you are hurting so bad...

Official Gangsta rappa of the Royal Court

Will you be there?
Cam'ron Giles is offline  
post #9 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 04:09 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Reno,Nevada
Posts: 29
 
Kim deffinetly had her chances to beat Serena wasnt she up like 5-1 in the third? Another boring ass williams final awaits us
martinarules is offline  
post #10 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 04:21 PM
Snitch
 
Cam'ron Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Juelz Santana's bed
Posts: 16,094
                     
Noone is forcing you to watch. I see that you are a glutton for punishment judging by you username...LOL

Official Gangsta rappa of the Royal Court

Will you be there?
Cam'ron Giles is offline  
post #11 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 04:28 PM
Senior Member
 
hingis-seles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 19,135
                     
The only thing I am wondering after reading this article is where these, I shudder to use the term, "journalists" were when Martina collapsed against Jen. All I read was about Jennifer's strong will and fighting abilities. When Serena does the same, it's all about "Our Kim" fails to stop the Williams Show.

I was cheering for Kim in the match, but she didn't play well enough to win and Serena did step it up like a #1 player should. What's so difficult about that to understand?

FUCK YOU, SEWTA.
[/SIZE]
hingis-seles is offline  
post #12 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 04:41 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,007
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by hingis-seles
The only thing I am wondering after reading this article is where these, I shudder to use the term, "journalists" were when Martina collapsed against Jen. All I read was about Jennifer's strong will and fighting abilities. When Serena does the same, it's all about "Our Kim" fails to stop the Williams Show.

I was cheering for Kim in the match, but she didn't play well enough to win and Serena did step it up like a #1 player should. What's so difficult about that to understand?
Amen.
Serendy Willick is offline  
post #13 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 04:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,500
                     
He isn't pretending he's impartial. That said, this line "....there was now a ghastly inevitability to what was unfolding....." is priceless. Whether you were pro-Kim or anti-Serena, the handwriting was on the wall.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #14 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 05:53 PM
country flag RAA
Senior Member
 
RAA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,031
                     
yes, I don't understand why people think it was gamesmanship when Serena continued to lose after taking that time out.. it certainly didn't stop or change the momentum. that only came later..
its a fine point that cybell pointed out but for some reason most people are missing.
RAA is offline  
post #15 of 16 (permalink) Old Jan 24th, 2003, 06:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Out of Venus' wrath
Posts: 3,166
                     
And this is supposedly the friendliest slam? Excuse me, I find that hard to believe.

Venus-Serena-Roger

Kuzy/Vika/Sharacoco?!?


clay season will ALWAYS be the speed bump in front of the grass season.

Tennis without Serena is like cornflake without the milk!
aisha is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome