and that is the funnie thing about it, when the truth comes out, somepeople can take it, others can't. why the fuck do you think kim said her chances against serena depended on serena, if serena was on kim said she would have to try and go for even more than before on her forehand, and if serena was off she would just have to get the ball back. kim basically is saying she knows she is playing a different player that in LA, matter of fact she lost to serena the hopman cup, and they was not a "for play" match. serena took it seriously. haters will always hate, pam is just really lettin the truth out, the serena vs. cappy match made serena extremely tired for the kim match, if that is the case, this match went a lot longer than that match, why wasn't serena tired today? i rest my case! i think serena gives credit all the time when credit is due, but when you have kim clijsters and the commentators stating how a tennis match really is in the hands of serena, what else can you do? why would you challenge the players serena is playing opinoin? i bet you wonder why kim says some of the things she says. cuz she doesn't lie! she doesn't hide from the truth. they made no excuses for serena, they told the truth! did you hear kim complaining after the match about serena's blisters? hell no, she said she thought serena should get them treated, b/c they really do hurt. what does that tell you? she didn't think serena was doing any type of gamesmanship? do you all follow your players examples, or do you just "hope" by your stupid acusations?
Follow Me! @CedricEarl