Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2? - Page 7 - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #91 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 01:43 PM
La Divina Assoluta
 
The Dawntreader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,907
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viktymise View Post
You mean this Clijsters?

This. I loathe Saint Sin, but there's no doubt how worthy an athlete and challenger she was during Serena's prime and generation as a whole.

Sin, Henin, Venus, Davenport, even Capriati make this generation look like a total fail.
The Dawntreader is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #92 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 01:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 44,000
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by doomsday View Post
You're the one being really arrogant here and no Serena ain't leaving clay for fun, just admit that she is not that good on the surface and we will be fine.
Clay isn't her favorite surface, but I ain't letting one freak loss cloud my judgement about her chances on the surface.

Always bet on black!
Can you handle the truth?
The truth:
Serena Williams: Greatest African-American tennisplayer in history
21 majors:6366


Official Prince of the Royal Court
bandabou is offline  
post #93 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 02:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Serena_Williams_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Da tennis court
Posts: 2,717
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Viktymise View Post
You mean this Clijsters?

Serena beat herself there.But even so Kim prooved she was tought opponent for Serena on times even in her prime.

“I'm not used to crying. . . . It's a little difficult. All my life I've had to fight. It's just another fight I'm going to have to learn how to win, that's all. I'm just going to have to keep smiling.”-Serena Williams
Serena_Williams_ is offline  
post #94 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 02:56 PM
Senior Member
 
pling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,302
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

Trying to slot in WTA players alongside ATP ones to make a "big 3" is jumping the gun.

Serena is currently a "big 1" and the only one that can be compared with Federer/Nadal/Djokovic. For the rest it's too soon to tell - we need a few more years to see if this is a big 2/3/4/whatever.

No WTA player made at least the QF of all 4 slams either last year or in 2011, so we've not yet seen the situation that the ATP have had for years.

The key problem is not the current crop - it's the generation of the same age as Nadal & Djokovic (Ana, Jelena, Sveta, etc) that mostly faded away, and have left the field to a mix of younger players & some late bloomers (like Sam & Na). The younger ones have years ahead of them to improve and progress - or to also fade.

In terms of achievements, Azarenka is currently more like Murray - gradual progress over a few years and now getting the temperament to win slams. But still too early to judge how the coming years will play out for her.

I'd see Sharapova as more comparable to a player like Hewitt, who's had a very good career (some slam wins & the number 1 ranking) but after early success couldn't live with the multi-slam greats when they hit their stride. It seems she can't adapt her game enough.

If ATP players like Berdych, Del potro, Tsonga and others hadn't had to contend with three great players like Federer, Nadal & Djokovic, and instead there'd been just one great (as with Serena in the WTA) their careers would look better
pling is offline  
post #95 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 04:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Coconut91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,637
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pling View Post
Trying to slot in WTA players alongside ATP ones to make a "big 3" is jumping the gun.

Serena is currently a "big 1" and the only one that can be compared with Federer/Nadal/Djokovic. For the rest it's too soon to tell - we need a few more years to see if this is a big 2/3/4/whatever.

No WTA player made at least the QF of all 4 slams either last year or in 2011, so we've not yet seen the situation that the ATP have had for years.

The key problem is not the current crop - it's the generation of the same age as Nadal & Djokovic (Ana, Jelena, Sveta, etc) that mostly faded away, and have left the field to a mix of younger players & some late bloomers (like Sam & Na). The younger ones have years ahead of them to improve and progress - or to also fade.

In terms of achievements, Azarenka is currently more like Murray - gradual progress over a few years and now getting the temperament to win slams. But still too early to judge how the coming years will play out for her.

I'd see Sharapova as more comparable to a player like Hewitt, who's had a very good career (some slam wins & the number 1 ranking) but after early success couldn't live with the multi-slam greats when they hit their stride. It seems she can't adapt her game enough.

If ATP players like Berdych, Del potro, Tsonga and others hadn't had to contend with three great players like Federer, Nadal & Djokovic, and instead there'd been just one great (as with Serena in the WTA) their careers would look better
EXACTLY. I'll never understand why people blame everything on the young generation. We are talking about 21, 22, 23 year olds at most, who have years ahead to win more Grand Slams/fade away/emerge/whatever, but somehow nobody remembers that the likes of Jankovic, Zvonareva, Ivanovic, Kuznetsova, etc., are the ones who should be filling that spot right now, dominating the tour, beating Serena, winning the Grand Slams.

I mean are Goffin, Dimitrov or Nishikori bashed because they're not part of the "Big 4", or because they've never come close winning a GS? No, because they're still young, and they have a bunch of 25, 26, 27 year olds in their primes winning all the important titles. The problem in the WTA is that we don't have those 25, 26, 27 year olds. We blame the youngsters but it's not their fault that Ivanovic and Kuznetsova have become irrelevant. They are actually better ranked, have better results and even win GS, but still get all the criticism.
So if we're gonna bash a generation, let's bash the one that came right after the "Golden" one but failed to fill its gap. But even so I realize it'd be an unfair thing to do, because filling that gap is not easy for any generation.

To answer the question, there's a Big 1, followed by a Big 2, followed by the rest of the field led by Li and Radwanska.
Coconut91 is offline  
post #96 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 07:08 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,661
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

I told you! What did I tell you? Didn't I tell you? 'Cause I told you! MmmHmm! And when did I tell you? A long time ago! And what did I say what happened when I told you? Exactly what just happened!

Big 2!!!
Sgt.Timmykinz is offline  
post #97 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 08:04 PM
it's just me against the music.
 
In The Zone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 25,926
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

Quote:
Originally Posted by doomsday View Post
You're too predictable, you need new material.
Seriously ... we all know what exactly is being implied by saying Big 2.
In The Zone is offline  
post #98 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 08:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 991
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

It's the big 3, led by Serena who's a combined career 22-4 wins against #2 & #3, enuff said! Vika has stepped up a little bit as shown today, now it's Maria's turn to at least make it competitive even if she can't win
ZeroSumGame is offline  
post #99 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 08:13 PM
Senior Member
 
StoneRose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,320
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

I feel Maria needs to defend at RG to stay in the big 3 group. And even with Vika winning today Big 2 is still not totally there with the H2H and stuff, still a big step for her.
StoneRose is offline  
post #100 of 100 (permalink) Old Feb 17th, 2013, 08:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Cindy and Kate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 5,478
                     
Re: Is there really a Big 3/4 or is it just the Big 2?

It seems that right now Serena and Vika are clearly one level above the rest of the Top 5 players, and Sharapova seems to be losing ground. I hope though that she will catch up with them soon, the same of Petra and Li. I want the WTA to be as competitive as possible.
Cindy and Kate is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome