How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam" - Page 2 - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 12:40 PM
Senior Member
 
NashaMasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,642
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

1)Wimbledon
2)US Open
3)French Open
4)Australian Open

This year AO was on a decline , not enough really good matches and intrigue . Without Nadal ATP tour is not as entertaining as it used to be , and after Serena got injured women's part was like Tier 1-2 tournament.

Maria Sharapova
Career Grand Slam Winner
Wimbledon 2004 ~ US Open 2006 ~ Australian Open 2008 ~ French Open 2012 and 2014

WTA Championships 2004
London Olympics silver medallist

35 WTA titles , including 14 Tier I titles
21 weeks #1 player
NashaMasha is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 12:41 PM
you look so good...fantastic man
 
heavyhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,007
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazillo View Post
I don't think so. The crowd is the best in the world and the players seem to like the AO the best out of the four slams.
The crowd at the AO can be so retarded sometimes though.

seles sharapova venus bencic and barthel
agassi federer del potro nishikori muller berdych and zverev
freak it arabic style, لعق مؤخرتي
heavyhorse is offline  
post #18 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 12:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Doully's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 2,370
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

I'm bored of the constant undermining of the AO (and RG on occasions). They are what they are.
Doully is offline  
post #19 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 12:52 PM
country flag eck
x
 
eck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 33,521
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

For a MM slam, they offer the largest pot of prize money and the tournament director is actually well loved amongst the players. It's the one slam that actually tries to accommodate the players to fit their needs.

Best match this year? Easily Wawrinka and Djokovic on the men's, the women's...well..Hampton and Azarenka had the potential


It's regarded as the "fun" slam by many people.

some signature

Last edited by eck; Jan 27th, 2013 at 01:01 PM.
eck is online now  
post #20 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 12:56 PM
Senior Member
 
leftyness's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 645
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

"MM" Slam? Jeez, that's new to me.

For the fact alone that the AO was by two decades the first slam to have a center court with a roof makes it great imo. 11 hour time difference aside, AO=super for me.
leftyness is offline  
post #21 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 12:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Lachy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,108
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

IT'S THE BEST!!!

*apart from this year's*

BIGBROTHER TF!
CLICK HERE!

Maria Sharapova
Vania King|Zarina Diyas
Lachy is offline  
post #22 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 01:00 PM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Shangri-La
Posts: 35,192
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

Quote:
Originally Posted by thegreendestiny View Post
Not the grounds, but the tournament itself. Since when was AO considered a slam? Wasn't it sometime in the 80's? Historical, because of the historical figures who took part in the event. I don't remember the likes of Lenglen, Borg, Perry et al. caring to win this tournament during their times.


In all seriousness, Australia and other slams only gained their "slam" status in 1933.

Since then, the competition level at this slam has been weak with the exception of the 1960s and early 70s and from 1988 to now.

60s and early 70s was strong because Margaret Court was the dominant player of that time. Plus, Australia also had a lot of top female players during that time aside from Margaret.

1988 was a turning point for this tournament because it moved to a different location and different (unique) surface. All the top female players played in that 1988 tournament and it has continued until now with rare exceptions like injuries or careers winding down.




Sam L is offline  
post #23 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 01:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Olórin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 13,636
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

Quote:
Originally Posted by eck View Post
For a MM slam, they offer the largest pot of prize money and the tournament director is actually well loved amongst the players. It's the one slam that actually tries to accommodate the players to fit their needs.


It's regarded as the "fun" slam by many people.

"Wimbledon is the oldest Major, founded in 1877, followed by the US in 1881, the French in 1891, and the Australian in 1905"
Yup, the slams are regarded in prestige pretty much in order of age. I would agree it is the "fun" slam. It kick starts the tennis year, the players and fans alike love it. It has a great tennis tradition, some amazing champions and some amazing matches.

It isn't as "serious" as Wimbledon which marks the tipping point into the latter third of the tennis year and is traditionally dominated by the greatest of champions, but it is as well regarded in its own way. In other words: it is what it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alla Luce View Post
(1)A lot is being made of the record Serena has vs Sharapova. It is being used as THE reason she will win again lol. Good thing we have players like Tomas Berdych (who had an even worse record vs Nadal) to remind us of the fallacy of this nonsense logic.
(2)You stans may as well sleep well tonight because tomorrow the a replay of Lucie's winning moment over and over again will haunt your dreams for weeks to come
(3)The stars have aligned perfectly for the upset of the 21st century. All the best Garbine
(4) There is no path to victory for Williams.Keys wins in straight easy sets.
Olórin is offline  
post #24 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 01:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: London, England
Posts: 3,385
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

I like the AO and don't see it as a MM slam. Yeah, it doesn't have the same history as the other three, but it's got its own personality just like the other slams and that's what I like about it.

MARIA SHARAPOVA
Australian Open 2008
French Open 2012, 2014
Wimbledon 2004
US Open 2006
Olympic Silver
Victoria Azarenka | Petra Kvitova | Angelique Kerber | Caroline Wozniacki | Serena Williams | Heather Watson | Eugenie Bouchard

Last edited by Keegan; Jan 27th, 2013 at 02:14 PM.
Keegan is offline  
post #25 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 01:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,188
                     
Crowd is (mostly) great at the AO, that's why I hate Paris. My ranking is

AO
Wimbledon
USO
FO

Kerber Koukalova

Quote:
Originally Posted by phantomplayer89 View Post
She's been a top 10 player for 2 years now. We're way past the "beginning". She's never going to be inside the top 5. Getting to #5 was as close as she'll ever get.
Chaosm21 is offline  
post #26 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 01:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 3,289
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
Thankfully, no one cares what you think. Who calls it an MM Slam, except for people who don't know/appreciate tennis, like you?
I can't understand how could mod have such behavior...
Banditoo is offline  
post #27 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 01:56 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 53
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

What does MM mean ?
5tephane is offline  
post #28 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 02:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Belmont Lad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,675
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

Quote:
Originally Posted by thegreendestiny View Post
It's a great tournament all in all there's no denying that but there's just something lacking about it which I couldn't feel in Roland Garros, SW1 or in Flushing Meadows. Maybe its historical background and all those things but, I will never truly view it the same as with the three. The vibe I get is the same as in Miami. I'm not surprised some elitists refer to it as a MM slam.


Maria "The Shady, Shady Lady" Sharapova
Genie "Stacey's Goddaughter" Bouchard
Aga "Queen of Vultures" Radwańska
Belmont Lad is offline  
post #29 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 02:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 8,500
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

It's a great tournament. Great crowds, great facilities.

But shame that Australian tennis is in the condition it is, forcing the home crowd to cheer for imported players like Gajdosova or Rodionova instead of a home-grown talent. But maybe Sam Stosur will surprise us next year and wins the whole thing?
Petronius is offline  
post #30 of 234 (permalink) Old Jan 27th, 2013, 02:04 PM
country flag LCS
Senior Member
 
LCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,671
                     
Re: How is the Australian Open viewed as a "grand slam"

Quote:
Originally Posted by thegreendestiny View Post
Not the grounds, but the tournament itself. Since when was AO considered a slam? Wasn't it sometime in the 80's? Historical, because of the historical figures who took part in the event. I don't remember the likes of Lenglen, Borg, Perry et al. caring to win this tournament during their times.
Because it was so easy to go all the way to Australia back in the day...:rolleye:

Hater.

Tennis Tipping
Singles
W: (12) Australian Open (11) 50K Monzon, Toronto F: (12) Montreal (09) 25K Redding, Bali YEC (08) Memphis, Stanford, 100K Krakow SF: (13) Toronto (12) Estoril Open (09) Roland Garros, Stanford (08) Auckland, Rome, Eastbourne, New Haven
Doubles W: (11) Hobart (09) 25K Redding (08) Doha, Istanbul (07) Estoril Open F: (12) Pattaya, Roland Garros, Stanford (11) Guangzhou(08) Memphis, Wimbledon, New Haven (07) Bali SF: (11) Trnava (10) Stuttgart (08) Budapest (07)Birmingham, US Open QF: (12) Australian Open (11) Roland Garros
LCS is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome