Tennis Forum banner

Who Would Win ???

Who Would Have Won 2013 AO Without The Injuries to Serena, Jamie, Viktoria and Na ???

3K views 38 replies 36 participants last post by  StoneRose 
#1 · (Edited)
the thread someone made about there being no injuries or retirements @ this AO :facepalm: yes there was no match that ended this way but cannot ignore injuries to the four most in-form players in the tournament

1) Jamie's back injury in the 3R

2) Serena's ankle injury in the 1R and back injury in the QF

3) Vika's rib injury in the SF

4) Na's ankle injuries and concussion in the F

who would have won the tournament if these injuries did not happen :confused:
 
#34 ·
Whether you like her or not, it's Serena until the day she decides to step down from her throne. If the queen doesn't fulfill her duty due to lack of motivation or shit happens to her in this case, then the princess takes over and that's Vika. All the other bitches and peasants bow down.
 
#38 ·
Serena would have won that is what everyone is thinking, but so what injury is part of the game, Azarenka won, i am a Serena fan, but i am happy for Azarenka. It's like saying what if Serena didn't have that foot injury, or if Kvitova didn't let herself go like that. Let's move on to the next tournaments.
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top