The attacking player myth
triggered by the reaction some people had over sharapova's defeat, saying she played bad, (which is a discussion for another place) i got to think of something thats on my mind for a long time.
people often look at the unforced errors to determine how well did someone play. despite the fact that sometimes thats the way to go, (because one can, indeed, spray errors unprovoked) usually its not an accurate analysis.
i say so because agressive players are usually very intense on court and usually can only sustain that level in short to medium exchanges. if the other person can still grind in the rallies, even when presented with huge attacking power, its a matter of time when, even the greatest attacking player will miss. i certainly dont agree to mark this miss as an unforced error, since the opponent showed answers to your every move until you couldnt keep up
thats how you overlook deffense based players such as radwanska or kerber, who, in their good days, make you kill with your own weapons..
anyway, what do you think of that matter, guys? is there such thing as make to make you hit an unforced error, or even an UE in long rallies can be credited as bad play and the players own fault?
Forever in love with my best friend and true love it girl.
dominic thiem. a grain of sand in this wild universe
Last edited by Leo.; Jan 25th, 2013 at 09:22 PM.