Is there a case for considering Seles to be greater than Serena?
Just asking. Considering some here now think Slam counts aren't that important if Serena has a case of being greater than Graf, surely by the same logic there is a case for Monica being greater than Serena? Especially when the key argument for Serena>Graf is that "Serena at her peak was (supposedly) more dominant than Graf" -- well there's no doubt that Monica's peak was more glorious and lasted far longer than Serena's did. Similarly some argue Serena would've won more Slams than Graf had she not got that injury in 2003 - well you can CERTAINLY argue the same for Seles's stabbing, especially when you consider that she'd won 8 Slams by the age of 19 whereas Serena had only won one at that age.