10 active players have won slams, too many or too few? - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 11:45 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,132
                     
10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

15 Serena
7 Venus
4 Sharapova
2 Kuznetsova
1 Ivanovic,Schiavone,
LiNa,Kvitova,Stosur,Azarenka


SO far 10 active players have won slam before, Do you think it is too few or too many?
andyjason is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 12:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Gentleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 14,427
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Very soon this list will be shorted. Serena, Venus, Schiavone, Li, Stosur will probably retire in next two or three years. Some of them maybe even earlier.
Gentleman is offline  
post #3 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 12:57 PM
.
 
Royals.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,136
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon Daniel View Post
Very soon this list will be shorted. Serena, Venus, Schiavone, Li, Stosur will probably retire in next two or three years. Some of them maybe even earlier.
Even so.. new players will still win slams and still be active so it could increase. We will hopefully still have Azarenka, Sharapova, Ivanovic, Kvitova and new slam winners hopefully.

It's a new art form showing people how little we care.
Royals. is offline  
post #4 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 01:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Lisbon
Posts: 684
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

I think that this show how consistent the top players can be, not giving the opportunity to the newcomers.
Jeffery is offline  
post #5 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 01:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Cosmic Voices's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 15,073
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Its exactly the same with the ATP tour tbh
Cosmic Voices is offline  
post #6 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 02:06 PM
Senior Member
 
Mistress of Evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,881
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Serena is responsible for Schiavone & Stosur being slamchamps.
Maria for Na, Azarenka, Kvitova.
Henin for Ivanovic.
Mistress of Evil is offline  
post #7 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 02:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Sammo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Self-made gilded cage
Posts: 34,296
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Светльо View Post
Serena is responsible for Schiavone & Stosur being slamchamps.
Maria for Na, Azarenka, Kvitova.
Henin for Ivanovic.
I'm sorry but

I could also say that Stosur is responsible for 10 of Serena's 15 GS as she didn't bring her A Serena-kicking game since the beginning

The belief that man is an irresolute creature pulled this way and that by two forces of equal strength, alternately winning and losing the battle for his soul; the conviction that human life is nothing more than an uncertain struggle between heaven and hell; the faith in two opposed entities, Satan and Christ - all this was bound to engender those internal discords in which the mind, excited by the incessant fighting, stimulated as it were by the constant promises and threats, ends up by giving in and prostitutes itself to whichever of the two combatants has been more obstinate in its pursuit. Life isn't black and white, it's gold.
Sammo is online now  
post #8 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 02:17 PM
.
 
Royals.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,136
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammo View Post
I'm sorry but

I could also say that Stosur is responsible for 10 of Serena's 15 GS as she didn't bring her A Serena-kicking game since the beginning

It's a new art form showing people how little we care.
Royals. is offline  
post #9 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 02:20 PM
you look so good...fantastic man
 
heavyhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 5,007
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Totally forgot Ivanovic won the French Open.

But yeah, it's pretty similar to the ATP tour. I think more newcomers will start to win more GS titles as the big ones retire. Serena will probably retire in a year or two, I wouldn't be surprised if Venus retired next year. Kinda scary cause that means Sharapova will be the last 'diva' left and from then on it will be pretty much 100% new generation of players. I don't think that's a bad thing though; I would be excited to see Radwanska and Azarenka in a final if Radwanska improved. I just hope more younger players will start to come up at the same rate Venus, Serena and Maria did.

And I REALLY want more Hingis-esque players to appear. Tennis nowadays is getting way too general as nearly everyone is a power player. It's better if it's 50/50 cause a match between two contrasting styles of play can be so interesting, for e.g. Sharapova vs Radwanska in Istanbul.
heavyhorse is offline  
post #10 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 02:21 PM
Senior Member
 
stromatolite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 31,087
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Светльо View Post
Serena is responsible for Schiavone & Stosur being slamchamps.
Maria for Na,
Azarenka, Kvitova.
Henin for Ivanovic.
Your attempt at mental gymnastics gets you high points from the judges for difficulty, but unfortunately not such good points for execution.

Seems like you started out "Serena is responsible for Stosur being a slamchamp, Stosur for Schiavone, Schiavone for Na..." and then went "oops, that doesn't work...."
stromatolite is offline  
post #11 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 03:29 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GameSet&Match View Post
I think that this show how consistent the top players can be, not giving the opportunity to the newcomers.
Uhm, for how long have you been following tennis? That's not true at all Serena is one of the best players of all time, but aside from Sharapova no one from the previous generation of players (e.g. Jankovic, Ivanovic, Petrova, Kuznetsova) is in the top 10 anymore

Li Na is nearly 30 but solidified herself as a top player alongisde the likes of Azarenka, Kvitova, Wozniacki and Radwanska. Same goes for Stosur. The new generation has rose for the occasion, 4 of them have already one a slam (Stosur, Li, Kvitova and Azarenka) and 3 of them have already reached a slam final (Wozniacki, Errani and Radwanska). Kerber hasn't reached a final yet, but she just broke through and managed to beat both Sharapova and Serena in the same year

Serena and Sharapova are all time greats, but I'd say the new generation is making a great name for itself. Definitely much more honorable than the flop generation of Golovin, Szavay, Vaidisova and the likes.
blistering is offline  
post #12 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 03:34 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Regarding the OP, Schiavone should thank Stosur for that slam win until the last day of her career. Stosur should be a 2x slam winner by now. Same goes for Li (should've beaten Clijsters at the AO).

The others have earned each of their slams, and it could be argued that Sharapova should have a couple more if it weren't for the shoulder injury (would've likely won the 2008 French Open and the AO this year). But Azarenka is currently playing at slam champ levels, so I'm not sure I'd be OK with her being slamless.
blistering is offline  
post #13 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 03:37 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,492
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blistering View Post
Uhm, for how long have you been following tennis? That's not true at all Serena is one of the best players of all time, but aside from Sharapova no one from the previous generation of players (e.g. Jankovic, Ivanovic, Petrova, Kuznetsova) is in the top 10 anymore

Li Na is nearly 30 but solidified herself as a top player alongisde the likes of Azarenka, Kvitova, Wozniacki and Radwanska. Same goes for Stosur. The new generation has rose for the occasion, 4 of them have already one a slam (Stosur, Li, Kvitova and Azarenka) and 3 of them have already reached a slam final (Wozniacki, Errani and Radwanska). Kerber hasn't reached a final yet, but she just broke through and managed to beat both Sharapova and Serena in the same year

Serena and Sharapova are all time greats, but I'd say the new generation is making a great name for itself. Definitely much more honorable than the flop generation of Golovin, Szavay, Vaidisova and the likes.
One more so than the other..
JarkaFish is offline  
post #14 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 03:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Gentleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 14,427
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LethalLaura View Post
Even so.. new players will still win slams and still be active so it could increase. We will hopefully still have Azarenka, Sharapova, Ivanovic, Kvitova and new slam winners hopefully.
I hope so. They all have potential to win more GS titles, and I hope they will do that before new generation replaces them.
Gentleman is offline  
post #15 of 65 (permalink) Old Dec 16th, 2012, 03:38 PM
Senior Member
 
NashaMasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,642
                     
Re: 10 active players have won slams, too many or too few?

quantity is good, quality is poor .... Multiple Slam winners are not in form(Kuzzie) / part-timers(Serena)/ going to retire soon(Venus), . From 1 Slam winners only Kvitova and Azarenka are young and have chances for 2nd Slam...

it's what is called transitional era or weak field....

Maria Sharapova
Career Grand Slam Winner
Wimbledon 2004 ~ US Open 2006 ~ Australian Open 2008 ~ French Open 2012 and 2014

WTA Championships 2004
London Olympics silver medallist

35 WTA titles , including 14 Tier I titles
21 weeks #1 player
NashaMasha is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome