"back to back" slams are pure BS , unless it's 4 in a row . It's not even close to winning CGS on 4 different surfaces compared to 2 different surfaces
Stefan Edberg and Ivan Lendl never won back to back Slams , but who cares about this invented by some TF-trolls useless achievement
hehehe, This thread is indeed hilarious, Ninja granny vs shrieking skinny young girl
And no, winning back to back Slam, especially in the same year is not BS. It's a remarkable feat to achieve since naturally most players would be overwhelmed with all the fame, press, parties and distraction after winning a Slam so they can't be focused on the next Slam and a let down would be happen inevitably.
Futhermore, winning a Slam takes a lot out of a player. Most players, except the greats would be so exhausted physically and mentally, so to bring out another god-like performance for the next Slam would be too much to ask. The new Slam winners will be the target for everyone at the very next Slam. Just look at what happened to Ivanovic, Kuzy, Myskina, Kvitova, Na, Sam, Francesca, etc... after they won their first Slam. Even great players like Justine, Kim couldn't win 2 Slams back to back in the same year ( they won the USO and AO back to back, but noticed this 2 Slams has an off season break in between so they were able to recharge their batteries).