Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever?? - Page 2 - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2012, 01:38 PM
La Divina Assoluta
 
The Dawntreader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,026
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

Far too inconsistent. I think two Slams were a pretty good measure of her career.
The Dawntreader is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2012, 01:49 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sometimes U.S./Sometimes Asia
Posts: 1,536
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

Jj74 said it best, IMO. Champions have to know how to win even on an off day, and Mary didn't really have the ability to dig deep against players she couldn't blow away. She was still a special player, of course, and yes, Mary at her best hit with more power than anybody else in her generation, and I'm including both Steffi and Monica in that statement (Not saying she was a better player than them, of course, but peak-wise, I'd take her over either of them).
tommyk75 is offline  
post #18 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2012, 07:02 PM
Senior Member
 
n1_and_uh_noone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,394
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

Quote:
Originally Posted by spencercarlos View Post
past the Qf round just 6 freaking times out of 52 times
Well, that just means that PEAK Pierce would have won 52*2 (remember, she would embarrass peak Federer ) = 104 Slams. But as we know, peak Pierce was not daily Pierce. Hence just a 2-Slam winner.
n1_and_uh_noone is offline  
post #19 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2012, 07:37 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,653
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

I can't see her not loving the sport since she attends so many tennis events to this day!

Anyway, just because you think a player should have won more doesn't make them an underachiever. She had a good career, albeit hampered by many of the things that hamper other players: injuries, family, shifting desires, etc.
edificio is offline  
post #20 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2012, 08:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 5,000
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

Quote:
Originally Posted by jj74 View Post
People seem to not understand that a peak player is not the real player. Mary was able to play at an incredibly high level from time to time, but she wasn't able to sustain that level for long.
Serena, Graf, Navratilova or Evert are on everyone's list as the best (in different order) because they were able to sustain a high level tennis for a long time, and even more, they were able to win big tournaments even without being at her top level or in their best form.

1994 is a good example why Pierce not achieve more. She was in top form, she destroy all her rivals, including Steffi Graf in semis, but she wasn't able to be that good in the final. Arantxa simply doesn't let her play the way she wanted, she had to hit one more ball in every game, and finally she started to make more errors. Her finals against Henin and Clijsters are good examples of that too.
In a good day Mary could defeat everyone, but when she wasn't in a good day, the number of players who were able to defeat her were really high.
And mentally she was very far from the ones that dominated the 90's
WELL PUT.
thrust is offline  
post #21 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2012, 09:18 PM
Everybody's a star!!!
 
Shvedbarilescu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 24,702
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

Tennis's biggest underachiever is a player neither you or I ever heard of. She had the talent to be a world number 1 but she didn't put in the work when she was young, fell out of shape, lost interest, perhaps didn't have the money to back her up and support her and didn't get the coaching and sponsorship she needed and so she quit the game as a junior, and now none of us have ever heard of her. Sad, but almost certainly true.

Shvedbarilescu is offline  
post #22 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2012, 10:09 PM
Senior Member
 
NashaMasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,642
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

biggest underachievers - Tracy Austin, Monica Seles

Maria Sharapova
Career Grand Slam Winner
Wimbledon 2004 ~ US Open 2006 ~ Australian Open 2008 ~ French Open 2012 and 2014

WTA Championships 2004
London Olympics silver medallist

35 WTA titles , including 14 Tier I titles
21 weeks #1 player
NashaMasha is offline  
post #23 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2012, 11:44 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 384
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

2 majors, 4 runner-up trophies, 2 time finalist at YEC, world number 3, $9.7 million in prize money....
Pretty serious achievements there.
Did she underachieve? She could have won another major or two yes but she lost those finals to Sanchez, Henin, Hingis and Clisters, all of whom won more majors than she did and all of whom had the consistency to become number one.
Consistency is what Pierce lacked and why she did not win more.
I think she achieved what she was due, if that makes any sense.

http://www.thetennisreview.com/hall-...say-davenport/
Thinking of five things that make Lindsay Davenport great was easy

http://guardianlv.com/2014/07/serena...o-save-season/
Serena Williams needs a Great U.S Open Series to Save Season
fluffyelloballz is offline  
post #24 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 14th, 2012, 03:15 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 13
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

Pierce the Canadian the French decided to class as their own just so they could say they had a slam winner. She overachieved tbh.
VultureHater is offline  
post #25 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 14th, 2012, 03:15 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 8
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

Wozniacki is a bigger underachiever because she would have a slam if she pushed a little harder.
moonballnurse is offline  
post #26 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 14th, 2012, 05:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 482
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

Mary Pierce was the Hana Mandlikova of Big Babe Tennis.


Sublime when playing at her best , but even if one thing went off, the whole performance suffered.
Adi1987 is offline  
post #27 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 14th, 2012, 05:21 AM
Senior Member
 
OsloErik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,659
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

If you think of the evolution of Big Babe Tennis as baseliners with...

power off one side -> power off both sides -> power off both sides w/ a big serve

Pierce was the first player to really put all three together. Did it inconsistently, but she was the first top player who had power off both wings and a big serve.

The next step was adding good footspeed to all three components, and that's where the Williams sisters came in.
OsloErik is offline  
post #28 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 14th, 2012, 10:50 AM
Senior Member
 
sebbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,034
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

Mary would have done much better if her mental part was better - the inconsistency was the result of the mental part which made her so tight on important points. Just looking at her game, she should have had more success in my oppinion. Her strokes were pretty much perfectly performed, and she was moving pretty good when she was in shape. She was in 41 finals during her long bumpy career but she only managed to win 18 of them so I believe that she is an underachiver.

MARY PIERCE
sebbe is offline  
post #29 of 29 (permalink) Old Nov 14th, 2012, 04:01 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
SV_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,346
                     
Re: Mary Pierce: Tennis' Biggest Underachiever??

So it seems everyone is split between over and under achiever.

Is there a reason for the inconsistency.
SV_Fan is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome