WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW - Page 2 - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 8th, 2012, 09:41 PM
Senior Member
 
allhingis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 128
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

ATP idiots, are the players involved in this kind of negotiation?
allhingis is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #17 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 8th, 2012, 09:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 27,644
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobito View Post
Just to play Devil's advocate here for a moment, what exactly is the motive behind Ellison's offer to increase prize money by $800K? Is he doing it because he wants tennis players to have more money or is he trying to set Indian Wells apart from the other Masters tournaments? If, as I suspect, the latter then that raises a further question.

If you have a Masters series where one tournament is giving out more nearly twice as much in prize money as most of the other events, doesn't that undermine the integrety of the series. After all, these tournaments are supposed to be on a par with each other. They have equal ranking points and are supposed to carry the same prestige. If Indian Wells were to increase prize money by $800K, the Masters events would look like this:

Indian Wells - $5.495 million
Miami - $3.973M
Madrid - $3.940M
Shanghai - 3.531M
Rome - $3.096M
Paris - $3.096M
Monte Carlo - $3.096M
Cincinnatti - $2.825M
Rogers Cup - $2.649M

If Ellison is trying to raise Indian Wells' status above that of other Masters Series events, are the ATP really being unreasonable in stopping that from happening.
Miami and IW will always have bigger prize money due to the 96 players draw.
Dubai has a Premier event. The prize money is about 2 millions dollars. Nobody is complaining.
Wiggly is offline  
post #18 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 8th, 2012, 10:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,837
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by NashaMasha View Post

Ellison: Yeah, sure. Love those guys. Heck, Nadal even stayed at one of my homes last year, remember? Nice kid, but left water bottles under all the chairs. Anyway, the tennis and players and the money -- let me guess: Someone asked where to send the thank-you note? Tell 'em not to worry about it.

Ellison: Call up Tim Finchem for me, would you? Pretty sure my money is good with the PGA Tour guys.



I think Ellison wants something we don't know and somebody (IMG ? ) is denying him.


Quote:
Originally Posted by VeeJJ View Post
And people are worried about Beijing trying to become the fifth slam

China Open is run/presented by IMG + CCTV.



Quote:
Originally Posted by bobito View Post
Just to play Devil's advocate here for a moment, what exactly is the motive behind Ellison's offer to increase prize money by $800K? ...

Indian Wells - $5.495 million
Miami - $3.973M
Madrid - $3.940M
Shanghai - 3.531M
Rome - $3.096M
Paris - $3.096M
Monte Carlo - $3.096M
Cincinnatti - $2.825M
Rogers Cup - $2.649M

If Ellison is trying to raise Indian Wells' status above that of other Masters Series events, are the ATP really being unreasonable in stopping that from happening.

Ellison knew what he got into and knew where the ATP's interest lies. He is just being a prick because he was denied of something.


Quote:
Originally Posted by allhingis View Post
ATP idiots, are the players involved in this kind of negotiation?
It's not about the players, the ATP/WTA, tennis, sports, business, etc .... it's all about Ellison .
PhilePhile is offline  
post #19 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 8th, 2012, 10:47 PM
Senior Member
 
NashaMasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,563
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
The ATP Tour Board of Directors passed on a proposal by the BNP Paribas Open at Indian Wells to increase its prize money by at least $800,000, in which most of the increase would be distributed among winners of the first three rounds. Tournament CEO Raymond Moore told the Desert Sun that the event offered to increase prize money by 29 percent or $1.6 million ($800,000 would also go to WTA players), but the ATP board voted 3-3, with CEO Brad Drewett abstaining
.A source told TENNIS.com that the tournament representatives on the ATP Board voted against the increase, with the player representatives voting for it.
ATP - What a disgrace........

by the way
Quote:
It is unclear how much Indian Wells proposed to give players in the first three rounds of 2013, but Moore said there would be small raises for the quarterfinalists and semifinalists, but no increases for the runner-up or champion. The ATP Players Council has been advocating for a greater share of prize money to go to lower-rounds winners.
I just don't get it , IW wanted to do what everybody wants : to increase reward for earlier rounds , but even this offer denied

Maria Sharapova
Career Grand Slam Winner
Wimbledon 2004 ~ US Open 2006 ~ Australian Open 2008 ~ French Open 2012 and 2014

WTA Championships 2004
London Olympics silver medallist

35 WTA titles , including 14 Tier I titles
21 weeks #1 player
NashaMasha is offline  
post #20 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 9th, 2012, 01:57 AM
Senior Member
 
coolfish1103's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 13,177
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

It might just be a show.

So what happens when a friend or partner holds a different opinion against your favorite?
- Agree to disagree, don't hold grudges for someone else

Historic #1: FITD S / Tipping S&D / Tennis Tipping D
coolfish1103 is offline  
post #21 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 9th, 2012, 07:13 AM
Senior Member
 
NashaMasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 11,563
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by الحاجّ مالك View Post
What tournament is this?
Indian Wells (Premier Mandartory)



By the way , according to Stakhovski ATP denied this offer from IW not because of the sum of money and this huge intimidating(for others) prize fund , but more because this increase was to be distributed among earlier rounds , with no increase to the winner and low increase to semi/quarterfinalists....

It looks even more worse now

Quote:
Sergiy Stakhovsky ‏@Stako_tennis

Hard to understand the ATP decision on Indian Wells ...don't allow tournament to increase their prize money is absurd..

Sergiy Stakhovsky ‏@Stako_tennis

@TennisReporters the distribution was not by the book..but it was not this year ether ..next year would be significant increase in 1st rds..

Sergiy Stakhovsky ‏@Stako_tennis

In the ATP Rulebook there is a %key for PM distribution for every TIER of Tournaments..
It seems to me that he means that ATP denied offer for significant increase in 1st-4thR prize money in IW with slight increase in QF/SF and no increase in F/W , just because it's against their rules......

That's how ATP takes care about "struggling for a living" not top50 players..... Nice from them

Maria Sharapova
Career Grand Slam Winner
Wimbledon 2004 ~ US Open 2006 ~ Australian Open 2008 ~ French Open 2012 and 2014

WTA Championships 2004
London Olympics silver medallist

35 WTA titles , including 14 Tier I titles
21 weeks #1 player

Last edited by NashaMasha; Nov 9th, 2012 at 07:19 AM.
NashaMasha is offline  
post #22 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 9th, 2012, 12:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Raiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 8,830
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobito View Post
Just to play Devil's advocate here for a moment, what exactly is the motive behind Ellison's offer to increase prize money by $800K? Is he doing it because he wants tennis players to have more money or is he trying to set Indian Wells apart from the other Masters tournaments? If, as I suspect, the latter then that raises a further question.

If you have a Masters series where one tournament is giving out more nearly twice as much in prize money as most of the other events, doesn't that undermine the integrety of the series. After all, these tournaments are supposed to be on a par with each other. They have equal ranking points and are supposed to carry the same prestige. If Indian Wells were to increase prize money by $800K, the Masters events would look like this:

Indian Wells - $5.495 million
Miami - $3.973M
Madrid - $3.940M
Shanghai - 3.531M
Rome - $3.096M
Paris - $3.096M
Monte Carlo - $3.096M
Cincinnatti - $2.825M
Rogers Cup - $2.649M

If Ellison is trying to raise Indian Wells' status above that of other Masters Series events, are the ATP really being unreasonable in stopping that from happening.
What's wrong with that?

So what if Larry Ellison wants to put IW apart in terms of money and in terms of amenities like HawkEye on every court. These are good things, not bad. It's not like Larry is demanding that the IW winners and losers get more points than other Masters events or something like that. For the sake of bureaucratic uniformity they could always name the extra prize money a "bonus" or whatever. So ATP's presented excuse doesn't pass the common-sense test, and the ATP CEO's abstention is a chicken shit coward move (he obviously is closer to IMG & co rather than the players, which is a disgrace since his organization is supposed to be a players organization).

For analogy: the Australian Open prize money is almost double the amount payed by Wimbledon, yet Wimbledon and the other slams are not destroyed by AO's move. They have stuck and kept their own prize money limits.
Raiden is online now  
post #23 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 9th, 2012, 04:32 PM
Sugar Co. CFO
 
tejmeglekvár's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,912
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by NashaMasha View Post
Indian Wells (Premier Mandartory)



By the way , according to Stakhovski ATP denied this offer from IW not because of the sum of money and this huge intimidating(for others) prize fund , but more because this increase was to be distributed among earlier rounds , with no increase to the winner and low increase to semi/quarterfinalists....

It looks even more worse now



It seems to me that he means that ATP denied offer for significant increase in 1st-4thR prize money in IW with slight increase in QF/SF and no increase in F/W , just because it's against their rules......

That's how ATP takes care about "struggling for a living" not top50 players..... Nice from them
They had to come up with some BS to deny their responsibility. As he said in the tweet "but it was not this year ether", so...
tejmeglekvár is offline  
post #24 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 9th, 2012, 04:37 PM
Sugar Co. CFO
 
tejmeglekvár's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,912
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobito View Post
If Ellison is trying to raise Indian Wells' status above that of other Masters Series events, are the ATP really being unreasonable in stopping that from happening.
Its funny, no one mentions this point of view when ppl want unreasonable raise for slam 1st rounds even if it would exceed the prize money of winning an ATP/WTA MM title. Wouldnt that hurt small tournaments and whole ATP/WTA tour?
double standards much?
tejmeglekvár is offline  
post #25 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 9th, 2012, 06:55 PM
country flag RVD
Senior Member
 
RVD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 31,470
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony. View Post
Surprised this hasn't been discussed.



Assuming the women would have received the same 800k boost in prize money as well, interesting to know if the issue was discussed with the WTA at all?
Quote:
One suspects that every player from Roger Federer to the likely first-round losers is hurling crockery, wondering why his own organization would take money off the table. But one also wonders how this went over with Ellison.
Threw it back in Larry Ellison's egomaniac-pompous-elitist face.
LUVS IT!!

Be peaceful, be courteous, obey the law, respect everyone; but if someone puts his hand on you, send him to the cemetery. - Malcolm X
A man who stands for nothing will fall for anything. - Malcolm X
Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall. - Confucius
The greatest scholars are not usually the wisest people. - Geoffrey Chaucer
RVD is offline  
post #26 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 9th, 2012, 07:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Simugna Help's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,474
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobito View Post
Just to play Devil's advocate here for a moment, what exactly is the motive behind Ellison's offer to increase prize money by $800K? Is he doing it because he wants tennis players to have more money or is he trying to set Indian Wells apart from the other Masters tournaments? If, as I suspect, the latter then that raises a further question.

If you have a Masters series where one tournament is giving out more nearly twice as much in prize money as most of the other events, doesn't that undermine the integrety of the series. After all, these tournaments are supposed to be on a par with each other. They have equal ranking points and are supposed to carry the same prestige. If Indian Wells were to increase prize money by $800K, the Masters events would look like this:

Indian Wells - $5.495 million
Miami - $3.973M
Madrid - $3.940M
Shanghai - 3.531M
Rome - $3.096M
Paris - $3.096M
Monte Carlo - $3.096M
Cincinnatti - $2.825M
Rogers Cup - $2.649M

If Ellison is trying to raise Indian Wells' status above that of other Masters Series events, are the ATP really being unreasonable in stopping that from happening.
If the tournament gets more money from ticket sales, TV rights and sponsors than other Masters tournaments, thus has more money to give to the players, than maybe all interested parties already perceive it as the most prestigious one?
Simugna Help is offline  
post #27 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 15th, 2012, 11:34 PM
Sugar Co. CFO
 
tejmeglekvár's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,912
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

http://www.tennis.com/news/2012/11/i.../#.UKV0x2e5Xpj

not WTA, though some really dont like Ellison.
tejmeglekvár is offline  
post #28 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 16th, 2012, 12:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sydney/Beograd
Posts: 1,079
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobito View Post
Just to play Devil's advocate here for a moment, what exactly is the motive behind Ellison's offer to increase prize money by $800K? Is he doing it because he wants tennis players to have more money or is he trying to set Indian Wells apart from the other Masters tournaments? If, as I suspect, the latter then that raises a further question.

If you have a Masters series where one tournament is giving out more nearly twice as much in prize money as most of the other events, doesn't that undermine the integrety of the series. After all, these tournaments are supposed to be on a par with each other. They have equal ranking points and are supposed to carry the same prestige. If Indian Wells were to increase prize money by $800K, the Masters events would look like this:

Indian Wells - $5.495 million
Miami - $3.973M
Madrid - $3.940M
Shanghai - 3.531M
Rome - $3.096M
Paris - $3.096M
Monte Carlo - $3.096M
Cincinnatti - $2.825M
Rogers Cup - $2.649M

If Ellison is trying to raise Indian Wells' status above that of other Masters Series events, are the ATP really being unreasonable in stopping that from happening.
There are already discrepencies between prize money, even with tournaments with the same draw size. For me, this just strengthens the arguement for a prize money increase.
dany.p is offline  
post #29 of 44 (permalink) Old Nov 16th, 2012, 12:06 AM
Senior Member
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,559
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobito View Post
If Ellison is trying to raise Indian Wells' status above that of other Masters Series events, are the ATP really being unreasonable in stopping that from happening.
As long as IW winner's prize money isn't (much) above other TMS events, it isn't above other TMSs in prestige. The only reason why ATP (Association of Tennis Promoters) didn't accept that was that other events' promoters would've had pressure to raise their R2 & R3 prize moneys.

And what if WTA had more prize money in IW than ATP? So what? Also Beijing, Sydney, etc. have higher prize money in WTA than in ATP. The calendar structure is different in WTA than in ATP. ATP has nine top tier non-slams/YEC, WTA's nine most important non-slams/YEC are on two tiers with P5 being below ATP's TMS in prize money. So ATP still gives more prize money.

A proud fan of
Sergiy Stakhovsky

My Twitter
August is offline  
post #30 of 44 (permalink) Old Feb 14th, 2013, 11:39 AM
Senior Member
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,559
                     
Re: WTA influence on Prize Money?: ATP votes down 800k Prize Money Increase at IW

ATP is going to reconsider the IW prize money increase.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...996628834.html

And I understood that increase on WTA prize money also depends on ATP's decision. If there's an increase, it's for both ATP and WTA.
August is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome