Ill have you know, that girl in the pic is Cara Delveigne - A SUPERMODEL. Whose just walked for Burberry Prorsum, Jonathan Saunders and Topshop Unique. Ofc Cara is more 'stunning' because she's been placed into an industry which only allows spectacular specimens
So I was right, Laura isn't "stunning".
Laura is plain, there's nothing wrong with that, she does not have model looks but she's a tennis player not a model, so lets stop deluding ourselves otherwise.
And Cara is a model, which is why I chose a picture of her to demonstrate what "stunning" actually is...last time I checked she was human so can be compared to other girls her age.
Wow. What's so pressing? Why do you even care? Not every girl can afford a professional make-up artist or stylist.
And I don't think this girl is more/less stunning. She's just different, how can you compare?
It doesn't look you wanted to make a fool of yourself. But apparently, you did. Sorry, mate.
Even without makeup Cara looks better than Laura.
I don't particularly care about Laura, but the hyperbole used in this forum reaches crazier heights every day, everything is either the greatest ever or the worst ever...when in reality its usually just average.
And trust me, Laura has access to professional makeup artists and stylists, she's the British golden girl, the LTA will be paying a pretty penny to make sure that she presents the right image for British Tennis. In both picuters both girls were in full makeup...one looked more stunning that the other, is it a surprise that the stunning one is a model.