Random question. Just wanted to know what people would think.
Player one has 2 AO's, 1 Wimbledom and 2 USO.
Player two has 1 AO, 1 RG, 1 Wimby, and 1 USO.
Don't read too much into the examples and base your answer off the Slams I used. It's suppose to be a general example. Like, "Would you prefer 6 slams but not all, or all 4 slams?"
If you have certain limit, meaning that you would take 10 slams that do not include all 4 rather than having just each of the 4, say so.
EOT(EACH OF THE) 4 > 5
EOT 4 > 6
EOT 4 < 8
EOT 4 < 10
If you wanna customize it even further, by adding an Olympic medal or something to the pot than please do so. I look forward to seeing your thoughts.
EOT 4 + Olympic Gold in Singles > 8 Slams
I hope I explained everything in enough detail so you aren't confused.
If you're saying it depends in the amount and or which slams you would have VERSUS having all 4 PLEASE say which ones would make them worth more than having all 4.
Would Sharapova be considered a more prestigious player than Venus if she won RG? She would have all 4. And Venus would only have 5 Wimby and 2 USO.