Chris Evert ont he evolution of the game -
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 03:46 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
slydevil6142's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando, FL US
Posts: 1,016
Chris Evert ont he evolution of the game

This is an article from the ESPN website:

From the October 2002 issue of TENNIS Magazine.

Could I compete with the women of today? It's a question I get asked from time to time and it's one I generally avoid answering.

I don't think you can compare Maureen Connolly to Margaret Court to Venus and Serena Williams to whomever comes next. The game continues to evolve. Yet when I think back to some of the great players of the past, they were doing many of the same things that players of today do. If Pancho Gonzalez had a modern racquet, his serve would give any player from any era problems. Rod Laver could hit from every type of stance and put heavy topspin on the ball. So I think perhaps it's the evolution of the athletes and gear, more so than dramatic changes in technique, that's responsible for improvements in the game. While there has been a gradual change -- when I started playing, the pro game was still about Eastern grips and stepping into the ball; today the emphasis is on Western grips and open stances -- the basics of the swing on each stroke have remained pretty much the same.

I have definitely noticed changes at the pro level, though. When I came on tour in 1971 there was more decision-making and strategy during points because the ball moved slower. I can remember having all the time in the world to come up with my passing shots. When I left the tour in '89, playing the likes of Monica Seles and Steffi Graf, I had to react in split seconds to my opponents. I felt it becoming increasingly difficult as the pace quickened to put some thought into my strategy.

So I adjusted -- just like every player does in order to compete with a new generation of players who keep raising the bar. My strokes at the end of my career didn't look exactly like the ones I started with, and I think one of the reasons I could change with the times was because I had learned the fundamental stroke techniques that have always been the staples of tennis. You need good balance when you move around the court. A consistent ground stroke will always come from making solid contact out in front of your body and extending your racquet through the hitting zone. And much of the game continues to revolve around how you handle things above your shoulders. It's still a mental game -- dealing with pressure, controlling nerves and learning from mistakes are all elements that define a player. If you can master these classic concepts, then you can adjust to any era.

So the question remains: Could I play in today's game? What do you think?
slydevil6142 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 05:05 PM
Senior Member
TSequoia01's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,565
Chrissie could have played in any era but she would not have been nearly as dominant in this new era. She simply was not that good of an athlete. She would have the same problems Hingis has, in dealing with power tennis.

Beat'em down Ms Williams, beat'em down!

Victoria Duval - coming to a slam near you
Françoise Abanda definitely a future #1 --- Taylor Townsend devastation on the march
Venus and Serena ferocious grannies --- Kimiko Date Krumm great granny still doing her thing.
TSequoia01 is offline  
post #3 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 05:16 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 718
Actually I think Evert's groundstrokes were more fundamentally sound than Hingis'. People tend to forget that Evert had some of the hardest groundstrokes of her era. If she were playing today I think her game would be very much like Capriati's.
bobcat is offline  
post #4 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 05:53 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,006
I actually think she wouldve probably had a better time than Hingis in dealing with the power hitters. Chris was very mentally tough back in the day, shed find some type of way to get a win over someone. I think Nav beat her like twenty times? before she finally got another win over her. Hingis just gives up sometimes.
Serendy Willick is offline  
post #5 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 06:18 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: atlanta
Posts: 653
A totally pointless argument and question. It's funny how its never posed on the mens' side of the game.

supremeross is offline  
post #6 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 06:22 PM
Senior Member
PamShriver's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In a Hottub with Judy Nel
Posts: 907
Chis had the most fundamentally sound groundstrokes in all of tennis, she also WAS an exceptional athlete and most importantly a natural tennis player. People who say Chris was not a good athlete or even relatively speaking are doing her a great disservice. She was IMO one of the most fluid movers on the court and very rarely out of position.

It seems funny to me that people constantly talk about how Navratilova dominated Evert for a two year period in the early '80's, yet when it is brought up that Evert similarly dominated Navratilova in the '70's most people will say (Martina most vocal of all, that it was because Martina was out of shape). I have problems with that, A. Chris was not in much better shape at all, in fact, she was just as heavy as Martina throughout most of the '70's except in '76. B. No one ever brings up the fact that if Martina can use personal issues and being out of shape for her not playing to her potentail, then Chris could just as easily use the excuse that she was going through a very rough personal time in the two years Martina was dominating her ('83-84) as she and her husband had separated and were on and off for quite a while. I'm not saying that I think that Chris was a better athlete than Martina (I think only Graf and Mandlikova were) but she was a LOT closer than people give her credit for, further, she WAS a better tennis player than Martina was and probably than anyone else. Her technique was unsurpassed (serve excluded).

It's time that Chris got her due.


That's what she said!!!
PamShriver is offline  
post #7 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 06:25 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Wales
Posts: 24,557
I think the power these days would be too much for the chrissey of old.But Chrissy was domminant in her day with her style,now its power who knows maybe in 20 years serve and volley will be back


Johanna Konta, Naomi Broady, Tara Moore, Heather Watson , Laura Robson

Eleanor Dean, Katy DunneKatie Boulter, Sam Murray

Katie Swan, Harriet Dart,
Monica_Rules is offline  
post #8 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 08:18 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London
Posts: 1,971
Pam, I think I love you. Thank you. We all know that the game has evolved, and yes, one day, even the sisters will have to give way to more powerful and athletic players than themselves.

It's happened to every champion in every era. People DO NOT give Chris her dues. Consider these facts....In a career which coincided with Margaret Court, Billie Jean King, Martina Navratilova, Evonne Goolagong, Hana Mandlikova, Tracy Austin, Steffi Graf, Aranxta Sancehz-Vicario, and Monica Seles, Chris's achievements include:

- beating Margaret Court as a 15 year old junior a month after Margaret won the grandslam
- 18 Grand Slam singles, including every grandslam championship at least twice
- at least one grand slam title for 13 straight years
- lost only 4 times before the semi-fianls of any grandslam over almost 20 years, and 2 of those losses were in the QF
- 5 grandslam titles on grass, and a Wimbeldon finalist another 6 or 7 times
- 2nd most tournaments won
- 2nd most number of singles matches won
- top 3 for 15 years
- 125 straight matches won on clay!
- retired with losing head to heads against only 3 players- Martina, Steffi, and tracy Austin!

.....and the list goes on.

I know that Chris can be a dill as a commentator (actually Williams fans, it seems she has really changed her tune now), but please do not disrespect her enormous achievements.
BCP is offline  
post #9 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 08:42 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In my own dreamworld
Posts: 136
I could beat them all. Right now. Right here.

Martina's LA spot must still be available.

Meggy. Get me my racket.
BillieJeanKing is offline  
post #10 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 09:00 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 43
here you go...

anything else I can do for you?

play Fed Cup maybe?
MegShaughnessy is offline  
post #11 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 09:06 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In my own dreamworld
Posts: 136
You're next in if I don't unreasonably expell Catrina Thompson from the team.
BillieJeanKing is offline  
post #12 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 09:07 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 43
Ooh goody...I can do a really good fist-pump these days. That has to impress you, right?
MegShaughnessy is offline  
post #13 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 09:11 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In my own dreamworld
Posts: 136
Only if you can do 2 at the same time. Like this.

BillieJeanKing is offline  
post #14 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 09:17 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 43
That's impressive.

Bet you can't look like a chipmunk half as well as I can though?
MegShaughnessy is offline  
post #15 of 23 (permalink) Old Oct 15th, 2002, 09:19 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: In my own dreamworld
Posts: 136
ooooooooooh I don't know........
BillieJeanKing is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome