Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion? - TennisForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 5th, 2010, 10:37 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: florida
Posts: 24,617
                     
Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

I've been reading a few newspaper clippings for an article I'm working on for a local tennis club. I discovered that the Slam draw didn't extend itself to the current 128-player draw until 1983 for all four Slams.

Chris Evert won 12 of her Slam titles when there were no more than 96 women in the Grand Slam Draws. Martina Navratilova won 7 of hers below the 128-player draw.

Does depth of competition factor into the GOAT discussion?

-one of those "bad" Williams fans that everyone keeps talking about


OFFICIAL BLACKSMITH OF THE ROYAL COURT

I don't mind straight people as long as they act gay in public!
Pureracket is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 5th, 2010, 10:39 PM
Senior Member
 
goldenlox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 97,318
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

I think the key stats are: how many slams did Martina win with other great players in the draw, and same for Chrissie.
You have to expect great players to handle #40 or #30 most of the times they play

That's why there is a Seles-Graf debate. Those draws got a lot weaker after a Graf fan knifed Monica

The most wasted of all days is one without laughter....
Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there
Enjoy This Moment!!
HEALTH and HAPPINESS to EVERYONE

goldenlox is offline  
post #3 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 5th, 2010, 10:57 PM
Senior Member
 
LightWarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,548
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

Evert and Nav used to sail to the semis for the most part. Not much competition. But they faced each other 80 times, mostly in finals. How many more slams Evert would have won if it wasn't for Nav, and vice versa ? On the other hand they probably helped each other be better players, even subconsciously.
LightWarrior is offline  
post #4 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 5th, 2010, 11:02 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: florida
Posts: 24,617
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldenlox View Post
I think the key stats are: how many slams did Martina win with other great players in the draw, and same for Chrissie.
You have to expect great players to handle #40 or #30 most of the times they play

That's why there is a Seles-Graf debate. Those draws got a lot weaker after a Graf fan knifed Monica
Not disagreeing you, but I'm not sure that's the total story, though. When the draw had a smaller field, isn't there a smaller need for fitness, preparation, and focus?

-one of those "bad" Williams fans that everyone keeps talking about


OFFICIAL BLACKSMITH OF THE ROYAL COURT

I don't mind straight people as long as they act gay in public!
Pureracket is offline  
post #5 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 5th, 2010, 11:05 PM
Senior Member
 
goldenlox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 97,318
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

But its also different rackets, a lot of differences. Like comparing Pancho Gonzales to Sampras.
Its 2 different situations they were in

The most wasted of all days is one without laughter....
Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there
Enjoy This Moment!!
HEALTH and HAPPINESS to EVERYONE

goldenlox is offline  
post #6 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 5th, 2010, 11:18 PM
Senior Member
 
goldenlox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: cyberspace
Posts: 97,318
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

And I think Serena is showing what it takes to be at the top or near the top of the all time greats.
You have to play big at key moments. And do that over and over.
Thats probably what the greats have in common.

Who knows how Evert or Navratilova would play if they were 25 now?

Laver was small, who knows?
You can only compete in your era

The most wasted of all days is one without laughter....
Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there
Enjoy This Moment!!
HEALTH and HAPPINESS to EVERYONE

goldenlox is offline  
post #7 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 5th, 2010, 11:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 3,686
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pureracket View Post
I've been reading a few newspaper clippings for an article I'm working on for a local tennis club. I discovered that the Slam draw didn't extend itself to the current 128-player draw until 1983 for all four Slams.

Chris Evert won 12 of her Slam titles when there were no more than 96 women in the Grand Slam Draws. Martina Navratilova won 7 of hers below the 128-player draw.

Does depth of competition factor into the GOAT discussion?
Today's players get to enjoy the advantage of a 32 seed draw at slams, thus avoiding a potential tough early round matchup before they've gotten into their groove (see Graf/McNeil 94 Wimbledon).

Arantxa Sanchez Vicario Always #1
Joseosu19 is offline  
post #8 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 5th, 2010, 11:34 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 712
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

Can anyone dig find out how big the draws were back in the 60s-70s? I think Wimbledon had the biggest draw for awhile, which is one of the reasons it was considered the most important. Also I think the seeds usually had byes in the first round.
bobcat is offline  
post #9 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2010, 12:11 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 9,232
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joseosu19 View Post
Today's players get to enjoy the advantage of a 32 seed draw at slams, thus avoiding a potential tough early round matchup before they've gotten into their groove (see Graf/McNeil 94 Wimbledon).
If this is the case, regular tour events are actually more difficult than slams, especially considering you get less time in between matches.
Donny is offline  
post #10 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2010, 12:13 AM
Senior Member
 
CloudAtlas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 2,863
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

It doesn't matter does it? If this is to be brought into the discussion then the quality of the opponents should be more relevant.
CloudAtlas is offline  
post #11 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2010, 12:19 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 9,232
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nidal1402 View Post
It doesn't matter does it? If this is to be brought into the discussion then the quality of the opponents should be more relevant.
No one is ever going to agree on something as subjective as the quality of opponents in different years.
Donny is offline  
post #12 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2010, 12:23 AM
V-I-K-A
 
Temperenka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: -
Posts: 11,080
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

It's relevant, but not to such an extent that it should be used to undercut the achievements of Evert or Navratilova.
Temperenka is offline  
post #13 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2010, 12:31 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 9,232
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

Quote:
Originally Posted by vaidisova28 View Post
It's relevant, but not to such an extent that it should be used to undercut the achievements of Evert or Navratilova.
But at the same time, current player's inability to play long series of matches in succession is used against them.
Donny is offline  
post #14 of 14 (permalink) Old Jul 6th, 2010, 01:18 AM
Worshipping the bangs
 
miffedmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Larsson's Player Forum
Posts: 54,834
                     
Re: Draw History: Does it Factor into the GOAT discussion?

It's just more evidence of the uselessness of the GOAT discussion.

Max
Pass the duct tape and super glue. Lena's done broke my heart one last time.
Onward my LOB! Lena (ret.) Vika Vee TOB Caro Alexa Sabs Wicky Lesia Vania BMS Ekat Andi H. Jo-La Lena V KP2 Lil Bit Kiki Mini Mak Baby Veronika
V Squad, The LOB Elite: Vika, Venus and the Mad Viking of Norrland
Jo-La Duchess of Norrland and Bastad
Elena Viatcheslavovna Dementieva--Eternal Goddess of the Divine Bangs
miffedmax is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome