What's better for the game: top players OR unknowns making it far in slams? - TennisForum.com
View Poll Results: In general, what's better for the WTA Tour?
Top players finding success in slams. It makes the tour more stable and the best players should succeed 9 75.00%
Lower ranked players doing well in slams. Spread the wealth around! Top players winning all the time is boring, unknowns add excitement 3 25.00%
Voters: 12. You may not vote on this poll

LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old Jun 30th, 2010, 02:35 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
twight6's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: home sweet home
Posts: 15,086
What's better for the game: top players OR unknowns making it far in slams?

This debate has been raging in several different threads lately.. So I figured we could bring everyone together here, and also I want to see what the majority thinks so I want a poll.

On one side is Martina Navratilova: she thinks it's bad for the game when Serena and Venus keep making slam finals. These people tend to feel that upsets are good, and it's just plain boring when the top players win all the time.

An example of this is the 2010 Wimbledon, where Kvitova, Pironkova (both pretty unknown) and Zvonareva (a former top player who has struggled the last year or so) are all in the semifinals. Also, I consider both Stosur and Schiavone lower ranked players, so French 2010 would fall into that category as well.

On the other side are the fans of Venus/Serena: they think the best players should perform in slams. The best players deserve to be there, the fans want to see the best players, and the tour is just in shambles when the top players choke and let unknowns through.

Also on this side is 2009 Wimbledon, where the top 4 seeds (Safina, Serena, Venus and Dementieva) all made the semifinals, with Venus and Serena squaring off in the final.

So in general, what's better for the WTA Tour: top players always making slam quarters/semis/finals, or the surprise lower ranked/unknown players making it deep into slams? And why?

Obviously the easy answer is: top players should be most successful, with the occasional upset run by an unknown. But I don't want that answer! If you had to swing one way or the other, which would you choose

How should you be? You should be like a rocky promontory against which the restless surf continuously pounds.
It stands fast while the churning sea is lulled to sleep at its feet. I hear you say,
"How unlucky that this should happen to me."
But not at all.
Perhaps say instead how lucky I am that I am not broken by what has happened,
and I am not afraid of what is about to happen.

Last edited by twight6; Jun 30th, 2010 at 02:40 AM.
twight6 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old Jun 30th, 2010, 02:46 AM
Worshipping the bangs
miffedmax's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Larsson's Player Forum
Posts: 59,521
Re: What's better for the game: top players OR unknowns making it far in slams?

It's not a question of who, but of how like I said earlier.

TOB and even Sveta winning Slams in '04 was great, because both of them backed it up with subsequent results (even though Sveta has been all over the map, she's been in the Top 10 and done pretty well). And they played well doing it, rather than benefiting from others falling on their faces.

Much as I've warmed up to her, Wickmayer made a semis run last year at the US Open due to a streaky performance and a soft draw and hasn't done a whole lot since. Could be a little early to say, of course. But that's the basic point.

Pass the duct tape and super glue. Lena's done broke my heart one last time.
Onward my LOB! Lena (ret.) Vika Vee Caro Alexa Sabs Wicky Lesia Vania BMS Ekat Andi H. Jo-La Lena V KP2 Lil Bit Kiki Mini Mak Baby Veronika Lucie Cornelia
V Squad, The LOB Elite: Vika, Venus and the Mad Viking of Norrland
Jo-La Duchess of Norrland and Bastad
Elena Viatcheslavovna Dementieva--Eternal Goddess of the Divine Bangs
miffedmax is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome