Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for slams?? - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 05:05 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Dawn Marie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North by Northwest
Posts: 15,035
                     
Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for slams??

I mean this is a serious question,as all i've been hearing is that Serena does nothing in the OTHER tournaments! Yet she played a full schedule, so why is the media and the ignorant haters lying by saying that Serena ONLY shows up for slams ? I mean players can't win em all. I mean if I recall she made the Miami final. (the fifth slam). I would like someone to explain away how Serena got to #2 with slams only and not caring about other tourneys. Last I heard she enters them and plays just like what the other players do. Do people expect Serena to win them all, while other players are ok with going out before the quarters in every tourney while never owning a slam title?

Only after the last tree has been cut down
Only after the last river has been poisoned
Only after the last fish has been caught
Only then will you find that money cannot be eaten. "Cree Native American Prophecy"
Dawn Marie is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 05:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,106
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

Her 4 slams and Miami results are worth in total 7200 points. Thats more than Venus who is at no 3 with 6865 points. Thats why she is no 2 without showing outside of the slams.
Even taking out Miami (the only tournament outside the slams she cares about) she would still be somewhere between no 2 and no 5 if she only had 10 3rd rounds in her 10 other tournaments.
The slams are given enough weightage but the tour may as well shut down if the rankings are to be counted for only 4 slams a year.

If you're not paying for something, then you're the product.
Expat is offline  
post #3 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 05:46 AM
Senior Member
 
AcesHigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 10,199
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

B/c if Serena actually cared and showed up for a few other tournaments, she'd be a clear #1. Her record at majors is incredible while her record at tour events is pedestrian.

If I remember correctly, slam points were given more weight. She's #2 b/c the points given for slams is enough to give her a top 5 ranking

I always wanted to be somebody. If I made it, it's half because I was game enough to take a lot of punishment along the way and half because there were a lot of people who cared enough to help me.
-Althea Gibson


Quote:
Originally Posted by darrinbaker00 View Post
When will you learn that "pushers" never make it past the club level, let alone #1 on the WTA computer? Will it be too late?
AcesHigh is offline  
post #4 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 06:04 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,251
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

Quote:
Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for slams??
By winning them.

Seriously.

There was a point in 2003 when Serena was holding the #1 ranking with only eight tournaments in the previous twelve months. Of course, she had all four slam titles. She only has three now.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #5 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 07:00 AM
Rainbowingis.
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,687
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

Sydney SF
Paris [i] SF
Dubai SF
Miami F
Stanford QF
Toronto SF

These are good results. Not far off from what Dementieva has, honestly. Serena just has the losing streak on clay (Marbella-Rome-Madrid) and then the Cincinnati 3R.

The slams are what make her #2 instead of Dementieva, Jankovic, Kuznetsova, Venus though. Her optionals aren't THAT awful.
LudwigDvorak is offline  
post #6 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 07:19 AM
Senior Bint.
 
Caralenko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,657
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

Did you just call Miami the fifth slam?
Caralenko is offline  
post #7 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 07:29 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,514
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

the miami as a fifth slam and santa claus exist only in your imagination,ok?hope i didn't shock you darling...
pierce85 is offline  
post #8 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 08:38 AM
Senior Member
 
tennnisfannn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,310
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

That is because Venus ony cares about the YEC, dubai and Zurich others Venus would be a clear no. 2
Then of course one wonders how venus in no. 3 have bombed out at ll slams bar wimby, it is because ElenaD only gets up to play serena blah blah blah....
Now if Kuzy can garner eough points to mkae no.1 order would be restored!

Rena- a tennis great! 22 at striking distance.
tennnisfannn is offline  
post #9 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 09:02 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 566
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

She doesn't put much effort into the other tournaments because she's fat, lazy and arrogant. I hope she gets injured.
Cookie Power is offline  
post #10 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 09:24 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,805
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

Quote:
Originally Posted by Volcana View Post
[/B]There was a point in 2003 when Serena was holding the #1 ranking with only eight tournaments in the previous twelve months.
That's not true.
AnnaK_4ever is offline  
post #11 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 09:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 350
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcesHigh View Post
B/c if Serena actually cared and showed up for a few other tournaments, she'd be a clear #1. Her record at majors is incredible while her record at tour events is pedestrian.

If I remember correctly, slam points were given more weight. She's #2 b/c the points given for slams is enough to give her a top 5 ranking
Actually she is showing up, then she lose, I think she just can't play her best out of slams, because she can get injured. Her margin over others players isn't good enough, she can't win WTA tournament with the level she is playing out of slams.
Anyway, we all know rankings is strange.

Last edited by jade001; Sep 4th, 2009 at 10:28 AM.
jade001 is offline  
post #12 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 10:24 AM
Senior Member
 
mapaliey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,672
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

other than slam,serena showing just for money appear....sorry to say but it's true...hahaha...come on serena wins US open...

click here : http://martinm.myminicity.com/ind

DANIELA HANTUCHOVA...MARIA SHARAPOVA...AMELIE MAURESMO
SERENA WILLIAMS...FLAVIA PENNETTA...DINARA SAFINA...STEFFI GRAF
MARION BARTOLI...SVETLANA KUZNETSOVA
mapaliey is offline  
post #13 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 10:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Xian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Vienna
Posts: 21,316
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

by eating up all of her opponents
Xian is offline  
post #14 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 10:58 AM
Senior Member
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 15,885
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

Quote:
Originally Posted by mapaliey View Post
other than slam,serena showing just for money appear....sorry to say but it's true...hahaha...come on serena wins US open...

We can't really blame her for that, though. She has to pay her furniture bills from something
Matt01 is offline  
post #15 of 17 (permalink) Old Sep 4th, 2009, 11:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 350
                     
Re: Can somebody PLEASE explain to me how Serena got to #2 by ONLY showing up for sla

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
We can't really blame her for that
You can't be serious.
jade001 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome