What kind of a player would it take to Revitalise the WTA? - TennisForum.com
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old Sep 1st, 2009, 11:37 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Steffica Greles's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: England
Posts: 4,073
What kind of a player would it take to Revitalise the WTA?

Okay, I haven't seen any of the tennis this week yet, but I've noticed people are starting to moan about the poor quality again. It's understandable. Women's tennis has, in many people's eyes, lost something over the last 5 years certainly, with a brief revival in late 2007 when Henin started to lead confidently before burning herself out.

But going back to 2001, men's tennis was in a mess, and women's tennis was peaking. 1998-2003 were all great years for the WTA. When lightweights like Hewitt were no.1, I remember being distinctly unimpressed. Safin was a headcase who couldn't win a match as number one, as had been Moya, Kafelnikov, Ferrero. But then Roger Federer realised his potential and set a benchmark for someone like Nadal. Now we have Murray and Djokovic being consistently in the latter rounds, because they know that triumphs followed by round one losses are not good enough for them to compete.

So that's what the WTA is lacking - leadership. Serena is a generational phenomenon, but when she's clearly past her best but winning comfortably when she feels like it, that's not a good advertisement for the tour. It reflects badly of her competition. It's not a good advertisement for her as a professional either, but that's another thing. Venus is sickly, and if you can live with her into a third set of brutal hitting, you have her weakness laid open. Her trick is normally to devastate in two, which is often enough.

In a way though, this is not a criticism of Venus and Serena because although they've both underachieved relative to their abilities, they've done enough to cement their places amongst the greats, particularly Serena, and now they're doing what Steffi did in the mid 90s, when Seles was fat, and what Chris and Martina did in the mid-80s, when they were both pushing 30 and had no serious contenders - they're cleaning up before somebody else arrives.

So who might that be? Well, it's clear it won't be any of the present protagonists of the WTA.

Ivanovic has the biggest forehand since Graf, but is not a big time champion. Like Clijsters, she did not acquire a taste for blood as a child, and now it's too late. The same goes for Sveta. Safina has not the talent, but credit to her for taking her opportunities. Jankovic has a battering ram backhand, but a pathetically lazy forehand. Dementia is deserving of admiration, but my feeling is that she hasn't won a slam because she simply isn't good enough; there's always someone who has a more convincing answer. Sharapova will never reign as long as Venus and Serena are here, and she might have lost her winning edge anyway. I get the impression she's realised there's a life waiting for her outside tennis, and it's a lot more immediate than it once was. Otherwise, it won't be any of the other squealing, sulky pig women, who bash the ball mindlessly. Nor will be it one of these by-products of Hingis, who without her talent, just seem to push the ball back.

So, let's dream. What would a new phenomenon have to be?

If she had Serena's strength and athleticism of 1998-2004, that'd be great, but a tough ask. It was lucky Serena chose tennis, to be honest, because in those days she could have won 100metre olympic gold. But Serena with Steffi's focus and Martina N's love of training and challenging herself would be on 20+ slams by now.

Someone with Davenport's serve and groundstrokes, possibly the most flawless I've ever seen when she was on form, combined with great movement, would be almost invincible.

Hingis would have been an all-time great had she possessed the strength and movement of somebody like, say, Clijsters. With that sort of physical strength, she would naturally have hit harder and would have had more scope to learn to kill her shots.

A Henin a few inches taller and stronger would not have burnt herself out, and won more slams. Thinking about it, if Henin could achieve what she did, then surely a taller, stronger girl can come along and hit shots with equal ferocity and guile?

Either way, we need somebody special to rise from the ruins, and I've seen no juniors who fit that bill in a long time.

There must be some hope.
Steffica Greles is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old Sep 1st, 2009, 11:44 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Slovenija
Posts: 515
Re: What kind of a player would it take to Revitalise the WTA?

Originally Posted by Steffica Greles
Okay, I haven't seen any of the tennis this week yet, but I've noticed people are starting to moan about the poor quality again.
Maybe some people will always moan.
I don`t think we need special player who would make them stop moaning.

Jelena Dementjeva
Marion Bartoli
Patty Schnyder

Majerič, Hercog, Rampre, ...
Šarapova, Kerber, Kirilenko, Makarova, Robson, Pavljučenkova, Svitolina, Vekić, Putinceva, ...
Tanja8 is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old Sep 1st, 2009, 11:58 PM
Senior Member
canuckfan's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,928
Re: What kind of a player would it take to Revitalise the WTA?


-A super hot chinese who does kung fu moves when she wins a point

-A blind girl who can still see the ball with her mind power

-A 9 years old Wimbledon champion

Hopefully all three!
canuckfan is offline  
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old Sep 2nd, 2009, 12:04 AM
La Divina Assoluta
The Dawntreader's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,134
Re: What kind of a player would it take to Revitalise the WTA?

There needs to be someone who's bigger than tennis.

However, i haven't got the answers for that really.
The Dawntreader is offline  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old Sep 2nd, 2009, 12:06 AM
watchdogfish's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,631
Re: What kind of a player would it take to Revitalise the WTA?

I think women's tennis needs someone to raise the bar like Venus and Serena did in the late 90s/early 00s. That and a Federer/Nadal type rivalry to get more interest back into the game. Women's tennis just seems a bit stagnant atm with none of the new generation, apart from a healthy Sharapova, stepping it up.

"That's not my wonder! It's just a smelly sock!"

watchdogfish is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome