Re: I get it : you're not allowed to be #1 unless you haven't won a Slam
this point is getting boring..................... whenever there is a 52-week rolling ranking system, it will be a possibility of this happening.
you can;t put a rule like that in place (only being allowed to no1 if won a slam), its stupid. the player with the highest number of ranking points should be No.1. simple as.
a 52-week rolling ranking, which is the only way to do rankings, will some time bring cases, like Jankovic, Safina, Rios getting to no1... but in fairness Safina and Jankovic have some big tournament wins in the rankings, with decent slam results, also brings cases like Kafelnikov rising to No.1 when he had lost like 5 matches in a row or something, its just the way it happens sometimes....