Title IX - A brief explanation - TennisForum.com
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 (permalink) Old Aug 30th, 2002, 05:53 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,078
Title IX - A brief explanation

The Philadephia Enquirer: Title IX

The Philadelphia Enquirer did a nice series on Title IX. Above is a link. I'm including some excerpts here, kind of a synopsis. The last couple paragraphs is about fottball finance, which is where problems lie with Title IX.

excerpts follow

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 5 (permalink) Old Aug 30th, 2002, 05:54 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 25,078
Title IX, which President Richard M. Nixon signed into law on June 23, 1972, applies to any public and private school that receives federal funding, from preschool to postgraduate.

The act requires that men and women be given equal opportunity to participate in sports. Over the years that has come to be interpreted as meaning that the number of female athletes must be proportional to the overall student body; that they receive athletic scholarship dollars proportional to their participation; and that all athletes be treated the same in such areas as equipment, travel, coaching, training, medical care, tutoring, housing and recruitment.
Title IX has brought more women into college sports than ever before. The number of female varsity athletes has grown fivefold since 1970 - from about 32,000 in 1972 to 150,000 today, according to the U. S. Department of Education.

An examination of data that colleges and universities are required to file with the Department of Education reveals that nearly 80 percent of them are not yet in compliance.

Schools have lost all eight Title IX cases that reached the federal appeals court level, according to the National Women's Law Center.

Colleges have three ways to prove equality in participation: They can display gender "proportionality"; a history of improvements in women's programs; or proof that women's interests have been accommodated.
The latter two standards are somewhat vague, so courts have leaned on proportionality - which critics have labeled a form of quota - as the truest test of Title IX.

College officials say it is a difficult standard to meet, particularly because the statistics continue to show more women than men enrolling in post-secondary institutions.
"If you're shooting for proportionality," said Scott Johnson, athletic director at California State University, Fresno, "you're shooting at a constantly moving target because the male-female ratio changes year to year."

Coming up with plans to address proportionality has led to some painful and contentious decisions.

"It's first of all a moral issue," said Charles Pollock, vice president for student affairs at Bucknell University, which recently downgraded crew to a club sport and eliminated wrestling because of Title IX concerns. "But when you overlay the legal issues, it may well be unsolvable."

Many tradition-rich men's sports find themselves in peril because administrators would rather eliminate wrestling and men's gymnastics than fund new women's programs by cutting the budgets of football and men's basketball, the unchallenged behemoths of college sports.

Advocates say it was never Title IX's purpose to reduce opportunities for men. They suggest the problem exists not because of Title IX, but because of the unchallenged giant of college sports - football.

Football, with its huge budgets and its rosters of 100 or more players, makes proportionality difficult.
To balance the number of football players, schools must either add more women's sports or reduce the size - or number - of their men's squads. "Cut football scholarships from 85 to 60 and the problem is solved," said Donna Lopiano, head of the Women's Sports Foundation. Penn State coach Joe Paterno noted that football scholarships already have been trimmed from 110 to 85 in the last two decades, a total he calls too small for college football's two-platoon system. "If the presidents want to go back to one-platoon football and make freshmen ineligible, then I'd be all for 65," Paterno said.

Spending cutbacks are unlikely at the 48 Division I-A schools that, according to the latest NCAA figures, make money on football. Besides, those schools earn enough money from the sport to support their entire programs, for men and women.

What about the other 67 I-A schools, like Temple, that run an average athletic deficit of $6.3 million a year, largely because of football? Administrators insist that even for those schools, football is an important revenue source.
"The schools in Division I-A football, even those not currently making money, recognize [that] the revenue-producing potential of football far exceeds that of any other sport," said University of Virginia athletic director Craig Littlepage. "And besides, while they might not be making a profit, they are generating revenue. And that alone is significant."

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #3 of 5 (permalink) Old Aug 30th, 2002, 08:28 PM
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: You bet!
Posts: 1,992
Despite the apparent flaws, this legislation has unquestionably translated into innumerable Olympic medals for the Star-Spangled Banner. On the women's side.
Iconoclast is offline  
post #4 of 5 (permalink) Old Aug 30th, 2002, 09:28 PM
Senior Member
Lindsayfan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Mexico City, Mexico
Posts: 4,601
thanks a lot for the explanation!
Lindsayfan is offline  
post #5 of 5 (permalink) Old Aug 31st, 2002, 02:20 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
Williams Rulez's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Venus!
Posts: 20,610

Lindsay Jelena Maria

Mary : Monica : Svetlana : Sania : Jennifer : Amelie
Roddick : Grosjean : David : Djokovic
Williams Rulez is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome