that bullshit about the men having more depth - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 03:30 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hitlum
Posts: 8,050
                     
that bullshit about the men having more depth

whatever, they are comparing top women players playing qualifier with average ATP players.

The only exception with two top ATP players having a close match was Safin - Kiefer, what about Agassi? Lleyton Hewitt? they didn't struggle much did they?

We did have a close match involving a top player in the women's side, Martina vs. Marissa Irvin.

oh yes, Capriati double bagels a qualifier who got a wild card into qualifying, and Igor Kunitzin vs. Noam Okum went to 4 sets!!!

give me a fucking break, Danilidou vs Nagyova went to 3 sets and many other women's matches.

They are twisting the comparissons to make women look bad and boring.

Plus, the men play 5 sets, in a five sets match is very common to drop a set, it's more difficult to win in straight sets, a 4 sets match isn't necessarily a close match.

And notice that many of the long men's matches involve a clay specialist.

It's time that Courier and co. stop talking trash, I think Courier should dedicate his life to poetry instead

PD: I am too lazy to bring the result, but just check the US Open site and you'll get what I mean.

Plus, 7 men's matches ended before time due to injuries, exciting isn't it?
Fingon is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 03:32 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,935
                     
Long matches can also mean that both players are playing badly and making a lot of unforced errors. Personally, I enjoy watching the top players in such good form that they barely drop a game
2284 is offline  
post #3 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 03:34 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,315
                     
Another reason why the Men's tour has more "depth". Thanks to the "Tennis Masters Series" events being compulsory to your ranking, anyone not ranked high enough to make the Main Draws of those events has a huge disadvantage in trying to build their ranking.

You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.
disposablehero is offline  
post #4 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 03:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,935
                     
...then after that the womens game becomes more interesting because so many of the men have been injured. What's the deal with all the injuries? Phillippousis was the only one I saw (he fell, re-injuring his knee. It looked painful)
2284 is offline  
post #5 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 04:52 AM
kay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 144
 
the men's game has no depth. Theyre all on the same level and they dont have a tremendous amount of talent. There are no young Beckers, Samprases or Agassis. They are all capable of playing really good one day and horribly the next, and the commentators try to pass it off as depth. Im not buying.
kay is offline  
post #6 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 04:54 AM
kay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 144
 
Btw, that marathon match that theyre all talking about should have been over in three sets, but as usual Marat is a nutcase. That match only got interesting in the 5th set, the first four was a display of Marat gone mad.
kay is offline  
post #7 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 04:56 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,935
                     
Do they call this depth?

In general:
If Hewitt is playing and is well, he wins.
If he's not playing or not well, Agassi or Safin win.

If a top male player plays a much lower ranked player - straight sets win, just like in the womens' tournament
2284 is offline  
post #8 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 04:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,315
                     
Another way to describe depth is "No matter how crappy you are you will still hold serve at least half the time because you can crank them up over 120."

You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.
disposablehero is offline  
post #9 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 05:00 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,935
                     
LMAO!
2284 is offline  
post #10 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 08:21 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Williams Rulez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Venus!
Posts: 20,610
                     
We should get Brian S in here...

And I agree... all this bull about men's game having more depth... I don't really buy it.

VENUS
Serena
Lindsay Jelena Maria

Mary : Monica : Svetlana : Sania : Jennifer : Amelie
Roddick : Grosjean : David : Djokovic
Williams Rulez is offline  
post #11 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 08:45 AM
Senior Member
 
gentenaire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: land of the incompetent
Posts: 34,743
                     
It's true that you won't see as many bagels in men's matches, but in the men's game, serve has an even bigger impact than in the women's game. Quite often in the men's game, one break of serve means the end of the set. You'll get a lot more rebreaks in the women's game and I find that a lot more exciting.

Everything you do continues long after you've gone
gentenaire is offline  
post #12 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 10:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: australia
Posts: 275
   
mens tennis is much deeper than womens. anyone who suggests otherwise is living in a fantasy land. you only have to look at the betting odds now for the tournament winner in mens and womens draw.

in the mens draw there are 24 players rated a better than 50-1 chance of winning. in the womens draw there are 10 at better than 50-1.

this shows that once you go past the top 10 in the women it thins out very quickly.

i think alot of ppl here get confused betwen depth...and level of interest. i agree womens tennis is more interesting for me because of the rivalries and personalities...but depth it doesnt compare.

Last edited by juggler; Aug 28th, 2002 at 10:54 AM.
juggler is offline  
post #13 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 11:52 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 27
 
mens tennis has way more depth than women's tennis, who are you lot trying to kid??
Lucie is offline  
post #14 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 12:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Greenout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Abroad with a passport
Posts: 16,036
                     
How can you even compare Safin vs Kiefer to Jenn's
match against a WC qualifer!!

Kiefer is suppose to be in the top 10. He's Tommy's
arch rival. It's no surprise that it went to a 5 setter.

The qualifer Jenn played is 17 years old!! and ranked
in the 400's!! This girls is officially the "lowest" ranked
player to EVER play the US OPEN. There is no
comparison to the Safin match. Geez.

Co-Founder of JUSTINE Philistines' Society
Paul Weller & Morrissey + Tennis - Singing = Justine!

"I hung onto tennis. I have done so for the past 20 years.
It is something that is in me, it is me." - JH
Greenout is offline  
post #15 of 19 (permalink) Old Aug 28th, 2002, 12:17 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,824
 
True. But why did you remided of the Okun/Kunitzin match? That was between two qualifiers (obviously the better one won ).

Men's tennis has lots of depth. Well you can call whatever you like to call it & i will just say this... THREE DOUBLE BAGELS IN ONE ROUND!!!
Venus/Mirijana? That could be a Haas/Spadea match, & i promise you that there wont be one bagle set there, not talking about two.

The point is: Some people find "Unpredictble" more attractive, like me, some people find "More predictble" more attractive, like 90% of this massage board.

Cogito, ergo sum.
Nimi is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome