This is the typical type of delusional comment I've come to expect from Daniela fans.
I've often found when criticising her that they comeback with "when she is on" (which, apparently is never) she is such a "clean-ball striker" and can hit winners all over the place bla bla bla.
NO. 1.) She is never on.
2.) I don't even think this "on" or "A game" actually exists anywhere.
She sucks. Get over it.
Apart from Indian Wells, but that is only because she owns it. They can't let the owner of the tournament play badly.
If you really watch tennis then you would know this is tennis language, being a clean striker of the ball, the set up is right and the ball is hit from the centre of the racquet not late or off the frame, foot work is together and taking either the ball early or just at the right point with the swing, as you should know if this is not right the ball can fly long or wide. Maybe you need to pay attention.
D.H can hit winner all over the show, se has a great b.h up the line and it is clean fluid motion, it s great shot, she puts all the weight into that shot and it almost never comes back best seen i think or hard court.
There is such a thing as being on an A game, again don't you pay attention to tennis, if player didn't have their A game they would lose a whole lot of times, hence when they are on their A game they win not just by great scoreline but their movement is great, striking the ball well, serving well and seeing their opponents tactics like a football, eeking out their opponents weak spots and best creating great winners.
D.H Indian Wella run was such that, she was moving well, serving well everything that we know she has was working, problem is D.H is not consistent enough to go deep in every tournament or even win a slam. She is very patchy and that is what will stop her from being in the top ten for a full year and i doubt she will ever getinto the top 5, it a level her tennis just doesn't have.
Know the game before you comment on it