Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0 - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 09:42 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
itzhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,663
                     
Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

slow start of Shahar but eventually she was more solid in the 1st set and Melinda was horrible in the 2nd seT. Shahar is looking much better although she can improve much more. It will be interesting to see how she will play against Anna, I think it will be very close...
itzhak is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 09:45 PM
Senior Member
 
frenchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,219
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Czink won 6 points in the second set

Anastasia Myskina


Radwanska - S. Williams - V. Williams - Kerber
frenchie is offline  
post #3 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 09:48 PM
Senior Member
 
AndreConrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Close to US Open :)
Posts: 4,670
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Good job Shahar

The best of luck to all tennis players; The game is on!
-Andre
P.S.Well,... special luck to Agnieszka Radwanska, Marta Domachowska, Daniela Hantuchova, Urszula Radwanska
Bally, Rest In Peace!
AndreConrad is offline  
post #4 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 09:48 PM
Senior Member
 
sammy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England
Posts: 25,413
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

peer played just as normal ran round getting the ball back but not doing much else. czink put enough good balls in court early on but couldn't hit a barn door at 5 paces in the 2nd set.
i cant realy remember peer hitting a winner in the 2nd set which tells you how bad czink got.

i feel confident chaky will beat peer, famous last words lol!

Anna Chakvetadze Rules

Kim Clijsters - Supporting the comeback!

I have no other faves, I just hate
sammy01 is offline  
post #5 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,582
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy01 View Post
peer played just as normal ran round getting the ball back but not doing much else. czink put enough good balls in court early on but couldn't hit a barn door at 5 paces in the 2nd set.
i cant realy remember peer hitting a winner in the 2nd set which tells you how bad czink got.

i feel confident chaky will beat peer, famous last words lol!
where u watching the match mate?
Nemo_Kool is offline  
post #6 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:07 PM
Senior Member
 
young_gunner913's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: California
Posts: 53,585
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy01 View Post
peer played just as normal ran round getting the ball back but not doing much else. czink put enough good balls in court early on but couldn't hit a barn door at 5 paces in the 2nd set.
i cant realy remember peer hitting a winner in the 2nd set which tells you how bad czink got.

i feel confident chaky will beat peer, famous last words lol!
Troll.

Great job Shahar.

And here you are, a black unicorn.
Mythical and mystical since the day that you were born.
young_gunner913 is offline  
post #7 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:09 PM
Senior Member
 
sammy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England
Posts: 25,413
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemo_Kool View Post
where u watching the match mate?
yes, the funny thing was in the 2nd set czink had about 4 or 5 points where she hit a realy good shot, peer would scramble it back mid court but czink was neither at the net nor on the baseline, so got caught in 'no mans land' which is realy a junior tennis mistake!

Anna Chakvetadze Rules

Kim Clijsters - Supporting the comeback!

I have no other faves, I just hate
sammy01 is offline  
post #8 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:09 PM
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Lunaris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bojov <---> Prague
Posts: 7,247
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by sammy01 View Post
i feel confident chaky will beat peer, famous last words lol!
That's interesting considering Peer is a wall in human form and Chakvetadze an error machine. We'll see, but I wouldn't feel as confident if I were you. Although you probably aren't, hence the reference to the last words. Never mind me.

Suicide Tennis: Amelia Island 2008
Lunaris is offline  
post #9 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:11 PM
Senior Member
 
sammy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England
Posts: 25,413
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by young_gunner913 View Post
Troll.

Great job Shahar.
whats your problem i gave my opinion of the match you didn't, your just ignorant to other peoples views , peer barely hit a winner in the 2nd set and won it 6-0, its a bad reflection on czink not peer!

Anna Chakvetadze Rules

Kim Clijsters - Supporting the comeback!

I have no other faves, I just hate
sammy01 is offline  
post #10 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:15 PM
Senior Member
 
tennisfan5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,727
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

hopefully shahar will play better than in their US open match
tennisfan5 is offline  
post #11 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:20 PM
Senior Member
 
Corswandt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 12 o'clock high
Posts: 13,765
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunaris View Post
That's interesting considering Peer is a wall in human form and Chakvetadze an error machine. We'll see, but I wouldn't feel as confident if I were you.
Their last meeting was one of the last good matches Chak ever played. Tight, sometimes ugly, but never in doubt at the same time. Textbook example of how to destroy a passive, one-dimensional baseline grinder without using overwhelming firepower. Chak hit countless wrongfooting winners and played the decisive points very well. It was really fun stuff, almost as fun as the beating Peer had given Radwanska in the previous round.

Peer's game is horrid, but she beat up on players I hated countless times in 2007. Also two nails in the coffin of Myskina's career back in 2006.

Kvitova * Vaidisova * Garcia * Robson


Eu Jogo Ténis


Prokofiev + Son Goku = pwnage
Corswandt is offline  
post #12 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:23 PM
Vamorza!
 
tobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: here and there
Posts: 46,252
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

It was 3-1 and GP for Melinda when I left and when I came back it was already Fran's match on SB and I thought Melinda won easily,but she certainly gave up easily
tobi is offline  
post #13 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:26 PM
Senior Member
 
Malva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,355
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corswandt View Post
Peer's game is horrid, but she beat up on players I hated countless times in 2007.
I wasn't aware it was possible to iterate hatred.
Malva is offline  
post #14 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:27 PM
Senior Member
 
.Andrew.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 18,031
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Seems like Shahar made a good transition onto the hard courts.

A couple of days ago, I think on Saturday, Shahar played an exhibition against Vika Azarenka in New York on green clay. Vika won 6-3, 6-3 or 6-2, 6-2 so it's good to see her play well on the hard courts now. Good luck against Anna.

FITD(6)- Pattaya City'10, Bad Gastein'11, Marrakech'14, Rome'15, Acapulco'16, Charleston'16
Q-Ball(15)- Seoul'12, Hobart'13, Katowice'13, Roland Garros'14, Bogota'15, Rome'15, Nottingham'15, Bad Gastein'15, Baku'15, Quebec City'15, Seoul'15, Tokyo'15, Charleston'16, Katowice'16, Mallorca'16
TT(10)- S: WTA- Mallorca'16 ITF- [50k]Hong Kong'15, Ilkley'15, [10k]Hong Kong'15 D: WTA - Shenzhen'16 ITF- St. Petersburg'15, Medellin'15, Kirkland'15, Tel Aviv'15, Hong Kong'15 (w/Daniela-Is-Mine)
.Andrew. is offline  
post #15 of 34 (permalink) Old Jul 15th, 2008, 10:29 PM
Senior Member
 
paranr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 316
                     
Re: Stanford R1: S. Peer def. M. Czink 7-5 6-0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corswandt View Post
Textbook example of how to destroy a passive, one-dimensional baseline grinder without using overwhelming firepower. Chak hit countless wrongfooting winners and played the decisive points very well.
I agree partially- Peer was very nervous in that match and it felt realy badly and she suffered badly from the lack of confidence that she "collected" during the summer hard court season. She was really heavy that day and she was very tight of the situation because obviously she had much harder pressure than Chaki who comes from Russia with many top players. I don't think that "A-Chak" will be able to beat Shahar that easily in a less meaningful match really.
paranr is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome