Should WTA championship increase draws!! - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 12:44 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Manhattan,NYC
Posts: 2,057
                     
Post Should WTA championship increase draws!!

IThe WTA has only 16 players invited to the Championships and it's not fair for the other 16 who otherwise would have been seeded at a grand slam...if the grand slams have 32 seeds shouldn't the year-end have 32 players in the draw?...


The Wta should offer several players ranked below 32 in the rankings, a chance to play in the year end...because it'll be more like a chance for that player to experience the feeling of playing in the year end...especially if that player has not to the top 32 in five years on the tour...

If a player below 32 in rank and has more than five years on the tour they should be nominated for entry to the year-end....

The #1 and #2 players shoiuld draw those players.....

When I think of life, sometimes my response is "Oh Damn!". But I still think of life anyway, "Oh Damn!!!"
maccardel is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 12:46 AM
Senior Member
 
RYNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,402
                     
Post

I like how the Chase is and I think thats why you have the whole season to get up there. PLUS ITS NOT A GS!

[ October 10, 2001: Message edited by: VtennisA ]

Venus ~ Serena ~ Nadal


RYNJ is offline  
post #3 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 12:47 AM
Senior Member
 
Barrie_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Fenway Park
Posts: 150,545
                     
Talking

Well, the "Majors" do have 32, and I think the Chase should have the top 32 as well.
Barrie_Dude is offline  
post #4 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 12:52 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Manhattan,NYC
Posts: 2,057
                     
Post

It's only fair because the year end has only 16 seeds and the point of the grand slams were too also let the players know where they are when the GS rolled around...if you receive a seed then you are still in the running for the year end.....if you didn't receive a seed then you knew you had work to do....

If the GS seed 32 then the WTA should increase to 32 seeds.....

When I think of life, sometimes my response is "Oh Damn!". But I still think of life anyway, "Oh Damn!!!"
maccardel is offline  
post #5 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 01:01 AM
Senior Member
 
kimclijsters4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Gent
Posts: 2,131
                     
Post

I think it's stupid to take the first 32 ...

And a grand slam it's totally different, there you have 128 players at the main draw, at the chase championships only 16!!!

And the Atp-championship have always had 8 players... So I gues we may be happy with the 16 we have now <IMG SRC="smilies/wink.gif" border="0">

[ October 10, 2001: Message edited by: kimclijsters4ever ]

WELCOME BACK KIMMY
kimclijsters4ever is offline  
post #6 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 04:17 AM
Senior Member
 
Becool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Terra Brazilis
Posts: 11,713
                     
Cool

I also don“t see any problems at all and have 32 seeds.. if we had 32 in all GS this year, why not put 32 seeds, also in a important tournament as GS, like Chase??
I think would happen more surprises, and the tournament would be more equilibrated. IMO <IMG SRC="smilies/wink.gif" border="0">


serena
townsend × rezaļ × lisicki × vesnina
keys × mladenovic × siniakova × jankovic


Becool is offline  
post #7 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 04:36 AM
country flag ys
Adrenaline junkie
 
ys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: always on the move
Posts: 21,536
                     
Post

If the choice would be mine, I'd do it the way ATP does. 8 instead of 16, and round-robin format. I just love round robin. Just imagine:

Group 1:
Hingis, Davenport, Clijsters, Serena
Group 2:
Capriati, Venus, Henin, Seles

And round robin.. That would be one hell of a tournament, one and only WTA tournament that would easily beat its ATP counterpart.

"..just knowing that as long as i choose life, there is hope."

Je ne suis pas charlie

PLAY TENNIS!
ys is online now  
post #8 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 05:00 AM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Williams Rulez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Venus!
Posts: 20,610
                     
Post

I think 16 is enough. It is supposed to be an exclusive tournament. Besides as others pointed out, the ATP only has 8 people... so we should be glad!

VENUS
Serena
Lindsay Jelena Maria

Mary : Monica : Svetlana : Sania : Jennifer : Amelie
Roddick : Grosjean : David : Djokovic
Williams Rulez is offline  
post #9 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 06:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 10,792
                     
Exclamation

Well it would have to be in a venue were there were more indoor courts. Not sure what the site is in Munich but Madison Square Garden would be definitely out in the event it would increase to a draw of 32.

But I am one that likes the way the format is.
Jakeev is offline  
post #10 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 07:08 AM
country flag rhz
Senior Member
 
rhz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,009
                     
Post

In my opinion 16 is enough, but i don't like that they're playing like regular tournament.

it should be like the atp, using round robin system, but have 4 pools and 4 players in it.

they got paid a lot, and it's been a tough job for the players just to reach the top 16. and what do they got lost in the first round and goodbye....

using the orund robin would be a very good solution. and each players play at least 3 times. the winner of each pools will meet in the semi final

how do u guys like it?

Maju terus Tenis Indonesia!
rhz is offline  
post #11 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 12:59 PM
Plainclothes Division
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South Park, CO
Posts: 6,350
                     
Post

I like it the way it is now. Limiting it to 16 gives the tournament an elite feel, which it should have. It also gives the fall indoor season some drama, as players scramble for the remaining spots. If there were more spots available, the top 20 players would be playing less, and weaken the indoor fields.

Adding to the prestige is that it's the only tournament (slams included) to award significant points for a first round exit.
Brian Stewart is offline  
post #12 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 07:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 214
 
Post

i agree with ys make it the way the ATP Maters Cup is that way the top players will still be there and they will have all the to work to ensure they make it to the presigious year-end championships. Unless of course the tournament is moved and on of your guarenteed top players can't play!! <IMG SRC="smilies/mad.gif" border="0">

"I probably respect Monica more than any other player out there. Not only as a player, but also as a good friend, and an amazing person. I was so happy to see her play well last week, and then score some big upsets here this week. But I was also very happy to close it out in two sets, because as we've seen these past few weeks, Monica never gives up." - Lindsay Davenport after defeating Monica Seles to win the estyle.com Classic title

"He's the franchise" Tie Domi about CUJO
Tennisfan** is offline  
post #13 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 10:18 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cancun, Mexico
Posts: 63
 
Post

i like the way it is, & besides if it becomes of 32 players then it won't be that interesting, but i would love if it becomes 16 teams instead of only 8
Togk 182 is offline  
post #14 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 10:24 PM
Moderator - BFTP
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,680
                     
Post

Brian has made the best point against a 32 draw. It's hard enough to get the women to show up after the Open, even with money "under the table". Adding to the field reduces incentives.

If anything, I'm with ys in favoring a round robin, double elimination. This way the promotors are assured the big names are there at least 2 or 3 nights, not just a day <IMG SRC="smilies/smile.gif" border="0">

The argument that Munich must have 32 because the slams do doesn't hold up when you look at the lack of excitement in women's matches at Wimbledon and the US Open. Only one big upset happened, and that was due to
Hingis having a bad back.

[ October 11, 2001: Message edited by: Rollo ]


Visit us at the Blast From The Past: Where Tennis History Lives!

http://www.tennisforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=59
Rollo is offline  
post #15 of 46 (permalink) Old Oct 11th, 2001, 10:37 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: California
Posts: 1,735
                     
Thumbs down

Actually Rollo the French had one big upset : Schett over Venus.

If you count Mauresmo going out in the first round it had two upsets.
BigTennisFan is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome