If you are interested, do me a favor. Spend fifteen minute refuting her thesis, as if you were assigned it as a writing project. Look at the names in her post, their so-called retirements and/or injuries, and the injuries of the WS and their playing schedules over the past years; focus on recently. Bonus points for tying in the argument that WS really "deserve" the #1 and #2 ranking, and refuting that statement. If you would do that, post it (you can label it saying you don't agree with this but wrote it as an exercise in understanding other viewpoints), then I'll put fifteen minutes into it as well.
Don't be paranoid,and in noway is stated that WS should be 1, 2 of the
You are so para you really dont understand what iam saying. It's simple!
Tennis has change, Richard W did the right thing at the time to not let the girls play so much tennis. And if you look at the last 10 years of wta, there are to much Retirees and Injured players who are unable to come back at the top of there game.
If you really think it's all ok just look at the list YOUNG players that has left the game.
Maybe it's about time that some take there heads out off there asses and adress the issue! unlike paranoid thinking that everything revolves among them.
It would have been so sweet if all these girls where still playing there game. but thats not the case. which brings me to my point.
Let them play lot's off tennis when they are young or just a few tourny's a year?