Pete Bodo: Sisters To All - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 07:53 PM Thread Starter
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Among The Greats
Posts: 40,063
                     
Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

A rare complimentary article for Serenus

http://tennisworld.typepad.com/tenni...7/women-1.html

Quote:
Sisters to All



Zheng Jie and Elena Dementieva have their work cut out for them on Thursday, when they try to prevent Venus and Serena Williams from meeting in a Grand Slam final for the seventh time. Yesterday, we saw
how easily Serena dismissed Polish sensation Agnieska Radwanska, while Venus made short work of perennial Wmbledon overachiever, Tamarine Tanasugarn. Factor in how mightily Zheng and Dementieva struggled to win their matches (with Nicole Vaidisova and Nadia Petrova, respectively), and it's hard not to conclude: This is going to be ugly.

Sometimes, it may not seem "fair" how easily the Williams sisters can step into a tourament and utterly dominate. Of course, you're better off excusing yourself to take a phone call from someone trying to sell you vinyl replacement windows than getting into a conversation - much less a serious one - with anyone who uses the word "fair" in a sports context, except in ways pertaining to the rules, or sportsmanship. More productively, let's pause and appreciate the Williams girls for two reasons.

First, it's become clear that in an increasingly deconstructed competitive environment, they're two twin pillars still supporting what has always been the internal logic (and unifying concept) of the game - that in tennis, every generation has one or more (but never many) dominant champions who set the generational standard and act as a measuring stick for everyone else. Take away that historic condition and tennis may as well be roulette, a game in which whoever happens to get lucky (meaning, finding her best tennis on a given day) wins; statistics tell us that it isn't going to be the same person very often, nor one whose win would be not just predictable, but sensible. And shouldn't tennis make at least a little sense?

Or, put it this way: snap your fingers to make Venus and Serena disappear and what do you have? Dementieva or Zheng winning Wimbledon. I'm not sure that does tennis, or Wimbledon, much good, because it would underscore a kind of randomness that, for all the talk about "depth" or even "diversity", ends up taking away from, rather than adding to, the pleasure we take from sports. People may complain bitterly about players or even teams that dominate a sport; but they whine even louder when a gaggle of players more or less take turns winning events. Two things drive day-in, day-out interest in most sports - great players and great rivalries.

Oh, I appreciate that Dementieva, a two-time Grand Slam finalist, has enough game, and has played well enough over the years, to be a credible Wimbledon champion. But credility is an issue that kicks in after an accomplishment, not before - as it did for Marion Bartoli, whose runner-up finish at Wimbledon now seems an enchanted abberation. Again - I'm glad for her, anyone who earns a berth in a major final got there the hard way and the only way, by beating everyone in her path. But our entire sense of what makes results important, and what make particular tournaments more important than others, relies heavily on the fact that certain players win more often than others, especially at the most important events. This isn't just for their own greater glory; by setting a standard, they more or less force or inspire all other players to lift their games - to work harder, compete more ardently, find a way to. . . be better.

How often have golfers or tennis players declared that Tiger Woods and Roger Federer or Martina Navratilova have forced them to work harder?

Presently, Venus and Serena (and to a lesser degree, Maria Sharapova) seem like the only things preventing the WTA from being inundated with a flood of winners who aren't capable of winning on a regular basis, and therefore can't possibly serve as omnipresent reminders of the value of winning. Oh sure, Ivanovic may develop into a dominant champion, but she isn't that yet. And Jelena Jankovic may ultimately transcend her remarkable capacity for self-sabotage (isn't it funny, how often that quality crops up in people we find "interesting"?), but she's made little progress so far in clearing that final hurdle to greatness. Sharapova herself has made the leap, but she's also demonstrated that she just doesn't have enough game, on enough big occasions, to dominate.

This year, for the first time ever, none of the top four seeds reached the Wimbledon semifinals, which tells you a bunch of things - first and foremost, that seedings ain't what they used to be. Serena has hammered away at this point with her usual braggadocio (and yes, it's still braggadocio even if you can back it up), repeatedly reminding us that she's a whole lot better than her no. 6 seeding suggests. You can say the same for the no. 7 seed, Venus. Let's get real, folks, Venus is a four-time champion here, defending a title, and just kicking buttski left and right with one of the greatest grass-court games any woman has ever brought to Wimbledon. What about that, exactly, screams out, Seed her 7!

The situation of the Williams sisters is, clearly and resoundlingly, a repudiation of the ranking-based seeding system, which disproportionately rewards (with inflated rankings) those women who play most often. You can defend the system convincingly; let's remember that the perfect is the enemy of the good. But the Williamses have exposed the weakness of the system.

The second reason it behooves us to appreciate Venus and Serena is the Yang to this Yin. They've proven themselves able, long-term competitors despite their antipathy to playing week-in, week-out and despite experiencing bouts of flagging motivation. Guess what? Justine Henin and Kim Clijsters, both Grand Slam winners, are gone. Amelie Mauresmo may as well be. Meanwhile the Williams sisters are still with us, and almost always capable of stepping in to restore some sense of order and logic to the game.

But more significantly, their approach has inadvertently created great opportunities for lesser players to perform well. They should be taking a cut from the prize-money of any women who finds herself in a quarter or semi of a tournament Venus or Serena has declined to play. The sisters have enabled many women to pad their ranking numbers, of course, but let's be more charitable to everyone concerned - it's also motivated them, and cleared the way for them to become better players. ( I can't believe he ACTUALLY said that )

Tennis is essentially a game of confidence - there's no other way to account for the remarkable difference in the levels of play ranging from recreational hacker to Grand Slam champion. Once you're "good" - let's say, Division 1 college good - the physical differences are almost negligible. Yet Division 1 good doesn't stand a chance on the Challenger circuit, the perennial Challenger competitor doesn't stand a chance on the main tour, and in the end David Ferrer doesn't stand a chance against Roger Federer. It's crazy how mental the game is.

But by releasing the stranglehold they once had on the game, the Williams sisters have seeded the ground for a few women who now see themselves differently in a game where how you see yourself matters almost more than anything else: Ivanovic, Jankovic, Dinara Safina, Kuznetsova and others have all benefitted from the way Venus and Serena approach tennis. I'm not nominating Venus or Serena for canonization, but I've been watching the sisters for a few days now. They just tower over this field, by almost any standard you care to employ. I can only imagine the plight some recent Grand Slam champs would be facing if the sisters were completely focused on, and dedicated to, tennis.

Zheng is only the second wild card to reach the women's semifinals at a major, and the other player so distinguished shouldn't even be counted. It was Monica Seles, who reached the U.S. Open semis in 1995 when she was returning to the tour as a multiple Grand Slam champion and former no. 1.

My, my, how far the women have come - with a little help from their friends.

Career Grand Slam in your 20s? Been there done that. Career golden slam your 30s?
There's only 1.
Serena.
♛♛♛♛♛♛♛♛
[22]
MrSerenaWilliams is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 08:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Mrs. Peel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,824
 
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

Mrs. Peel is offline  
post #3 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 08:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Destiny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 18,478
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All


GEWT GURL


TWITTER NAME : https://twitter.com/Mozzawalks
Destiny is offline  
post #4 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 08:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Becool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Terra Brazilis
Posts: 11,742
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

i'm shocked!


serena
townsend × rezaï × lisicki × vesnina
keys × mladenovic × siniakova × jankovic


Becool is offline  
post #5 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 09:32 PM
Serena's #1 Hater
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 19,718
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

Quote:
Originally Posted by Becool View Post
i'm shocked!
Why?

"He who finds a wife finds a good thing, and obtains favor from the Lord." -- Proverbs 18:22

"Hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard." -- Herb Brooks

"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life." -- Muhammad Ali
darrinbaker00 is offline  
post #6 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 09:48 PM
Senior Member
 
DA FOREHAND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 8,945
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

I've always appreciated Bodo's writing style. He has a way with words. Thanks for posting.

"Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated" - George Bernard Shaw




"And for the best of the teen-agers who followed her, and who occasionally referred to her as over the hill, Graf had a ready answer: against top-ranked Martina Hingis, Graf wound up 7-2. Graf's stirring 4-6, 7-5, 6-2 throttling of Hingis at the French Open final this June was perhaps the most emphatic parting shot the game has ever seen. "


DA FOREHAND is offline  
post #7 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 09:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 29,649
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

Before I read this long article, I just want to ask why Serena is taller in the pic... It looks so weird!
Agape is offline  
post #8 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 10:03 PM
Senior Member
 
AndreConrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Close to US Open :)
Posts: 4,670
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

Quote:
They should be taking a cut from the prize-money of any women who finds herself in a quarter or semi of a tournament Venus or Serena has declined to play.


Justine Henin, Martina Hingis should be taking cut, too.... wait how about those women that could be even greater and chose to not play tennis at all

The best of luck to all tennis players; The game is on!
-Andre
P.S.Well,... special luck to Agnieszka Radwanska, Marta Domachowska, Daniela Hantuchova, Urszula Radwanska
Bally, Rest In Peace!
AndreConrad is offline  
post #9 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 10:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 15,899
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

While for once he is highly complimentary to the WS, what bugs me about him is that he just can't write an article where he isn't bringing someone down. His implied views towards Jie Zheng and Elena Dementieva as potential Wimbledon champs are a tad disgusting.
LeRoy. is offline  
post #10 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 10:06 PM
Senior Member
 
AndreConrad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Close to US Open :)
Posts: 4,670
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

Quote:
Originally Posted by Just_Me View Post
While for once he is highly complimentary to the WS, what bugs me about him is that he just can't write an article where he isn't bringing someone down. His implied views towards Jie Zheng and Elena Dementieva as potential Wimbledon champs are a tad disgusting.
Controversial writing increases his reader base.

The best of luck to all tennis players; The game is on!
-Andre
P.S.Well,... special luck to Agnieszka Radwanska, Marta Domachowska, Daniela Hantuchova, Urszula Radwanska
Bally, Rest In Peace!
AndreConrad is offline  
post #11 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 10:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 29,649
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

Agape is offline  
post #12 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 10:09 PM
Bright Like Neon Love
 
Richie77's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Twilight World
Posts: 13,666
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

Fabulous article There's not a tennis writer better than Peter Bodo.
Richie77 is offline  
post #13 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 10:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Serenita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ►▼◄
Posts: 30,203
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

Sweet!

SERENA
22
Serenita is offline  
post #14 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 11:23 PM
Senior Member
 
partbrit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,305
 
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

Anyone who wins Wimbledon--including Dementieva--is a "credible" Wimbledon winner.
partbrit is offline  
post #15 of 31 (permalink) Old Jul 2nd, 2008, 11:33 PM
Senior Member
 
Oswald56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 401
                     
Re: Pete Bodo: Sisters To All

good article
Oswald56 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome