Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 01:45 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
RenaSlam.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 25,033
                     
Exclamation Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

A trio of favorites at Wimbledon
Venus, Serena Williams and Sharapova have edge on ladies' field

By Tracy Austin
NBC Sports
updated 7:00 p.m. ET, Thurs., June. 19, 2008

Who will be this summerís Queen of England? Thatís not a royalty-related question Ė but rather a tennis one as in which woman will win the singles title at Wimbledon?

Well, a trio of players has the best chance at doing so -- two are sisters, Venus and Serena Williams. The other is Maria Sharapova. Between these three they have conquered Wimbledon seven times. Venus has won The Championships four times Ė including last year (and 2005, 2001 and 2000 as well) Ė Serena twice (2003 and 2002, beating older sisí Venus both times for the title) and Maria once (2004). My pick is Sharapova.

Venus, Serena and Maria rank as my favorites, especially in light of the fairly recent retirement of Justine Henin, who was No. 1 in the world at the time she called it quits, stunning all of tennis just 11 days before the start of the French Open by announcing she had played her last match. In her last six Wimbledons, Henin had reached the semifinals five times and the finals twice. She had never won the title, but she had more than sufficient game to pull off that feat this year and complete a career Grand Slam had she kept playing.

The best leverage that Venus, Serena and Maria bring to the equation of calculating a Wimbledon winner is that they all truly love to play on grass. That just isnít the case for the majority of the other players competing at Wimbledon. These other players have more trouble adapting to the lawn. They find more comfort playing on hard courts or clay courts.

What also sets Venus, Serena and Maria apart Ė and perhaps not necessarily as a positive -- is that when they arrive at Wimbledon they will not have played any grass tune-up events. Itís pretty amazing to think that these are the three favorites to win Wimbledon and they will play only one tournament on grass all year, which happens to be the most prestigious grass tournament on the entire yearís schedule -- Wimbledon.

Tennis on grass calls for an entirely different brand of game than is played on clay or hard courts. The court on a lawn plays faster, the ball bounces lower, the ball tends to skid upon landing and to add to that -- because itís a natural surface -- the bounces can be uneven.

While this yearís French Open didnít end well for Sharapova as she lost in the round-of-16 to Dinara Safina, she was moving much better on clay than ever before, hitting the ball well, and she showed her great grit and determination in wanting to keep winning on a surface she clearly doesnít prefer. Sharapova had herself in position to win that encounter with her fellow Russian Safina -- even having match points against Safina Ė but her opponent just was a bit better than her in that match.

If Venus didnít have a remarkable past history at Wimbledon, logic would say look at her 2008 results so far and probably discount any possibility of her winning this summer on the English lawns.

But the fact of the matter is that at No. 7, Venus is ranked considerably higher than she was when she won Wimbledon the last two times. When she won in 2005 she was the lowest ranked at No. 16 and lowest seed at No. 14 to become a Wimbledon womenís champion. She rewrote the history books again in 2007 when she became the lowest ranked at No. 31 and lowest seed at No. 23 to win at Wimbledon.

Serena arrives at Wimbledon coming off a very strange loss to Katarina Srebotnik in the third round at Roland Garros. It wasnít as if she was a total fish out of water in Paris -- she won the title there in 2002 -- and in recent months she had worked hard to be fitter and trimmer. I was actually expecting big things from Serena at the French Open, but there are just days that a player Ė no matter how talented one is Ė that you come out flat.

What was surprising is that normally when a champion is having a flat day in an early-round match at a major that champion usually figures out a way to come through to the next round. I would hope that the third-round loss in Paris will make Serena hungrier for Wimbledon. Interestingly, Serena hasnít gone beyond the quarterfinals at a major since winning the Australian Open in 2007 -- she lost three straight quarterfinals to Henin in the remaining 2007 majors, lost to Jelena Jankovic in this yearís Australian Open quarterfinals, and then in the third round in Paris to Srebotnik so she will want to get over the hump at Wimbledon.

The hard part for me in analyzing the title chances of Venus and Serena at Wimbledon is that one never knows just where they are at and what their mindset is going into a major. I guess the best way I can put it is I find them a little bit more perplexing to figure out than other elite players.

Obviously, worthy of discussion is the new world No. 1 Ana Ivanovic and her potential as a Wimbledon champion. Ivanovic has a great game on grass and my biggest reason for believing that she will be a major factor is her big serve. It is a huge advantage for a player to have that big a serve at Wimbledon because itís difficult to break serve on grass.

Ivanovic can use her serve to set up her big forehand, which is quite the weapon. This skill translates well to grass because once she can get ahead in a point, itís tougher for an opponent to play defense to get back to a neutral position on the surface.

Ivanovic also has a very beautiful slice backhand that bounces low and will be more difficult to return. I also feel that Ivanovic is more comfortable volleying than many of the other women on the tour. The fact that Ivanovic reached the semifinals at Wimbledon last year allows her to know she can play on the surface. But, even more importantly, having just won Roland Garros, she is a major winner. That distinction gives her an incredible cache. In a playerís own eyes as well as everybody elseís eyes, having won a major she is now a completely different player. All this makes me think that Ivanovic has an extremely good chance to do well at Wimbledon.

My feeling towards world No. 2 Jelena Jankovic is that she has one important missing element in her game to be considered a true prospect at the majors -- her serve. Certainly, her serve is good, but the other aforementioned women have great serves. They can come up with tough-to-return serves, or at the very least, put an opponent on the defensive with the shot.

Jankovic has to work for every point she wins, which can be a big bonus on most surfaces. But on grass, her ability to seemingly always get the ball back in play is just not as essential a weapon. The bottom line is that on the lawns, itís just not easy to claw your way back into a point. I donít see her winning the title, but I do think she can go far into the draw.

Safina is definitely starting to come into her own. In the past, Safina would mentally breakdown. But in Paris she showed that she could stay in the now, in her matches, even saving match points against Elena Dementieva in the fourth round and Maria Sharapova in the quarterfinals. I used to witness her have her wheels fall off on the court -- throwing her racket and such -- but of late she has the confidence of knowing she can overcome adversity to win matches. Sheís definitely maturing.

Probably the most dangerous floater in the draw is 1999 Wimbledon champion Lindsay Davenport. She withdrew this week from the Eastbourne event with a bad knee, and she hasnít played since defaulting against Sharapova in the Amelia Island semifinal in April. But Davenport thrives on playing on grass so if sheís fit sheíll probably be worth watching.

A name I should also mention is last yearís surprise Wimbledon finalist Marion Bartoli. The Frenchwomanís current ranking of No. 11 is propped up by all those points she collected at Wimbledon last year. Bartoli had a great tournament last year, but I think her level of tennis has dropped back to where she was prior to her Wimbledon success of 2007. Itís very hard to anticipate the same performance from her this year.

The one player for me, personally, that Iím going to be curious to see how she does is Amelie Mauresmo. Sheís a Wimbledon champion, plays well on the surface, but is struggling of late. I like her as a person. I enjoy her style of tennis and I really like watching her play on grass. As a true tennis fan, I like everything about her and I hope she has a wonderful Wimbledon.
RenaSlam. is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 01:47 AM
MA5HA
 
Craig.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 33,793
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Forgot to highlight the part where she says her pick is Sharapova?


Les reines de Paris.
Craig. is offline  
post #3 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 01:48 AM
Senior Member
 
ASP0315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,108
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Who is austin?
and who give a shit about what she says.?

Ivo "Grass/Indoor King" Karlovic
Sania Mirza.
Shahar Peer
Flavia Penneta
# Brenda Schultz McCarthy # Elena Dementieva # Olga Govortsova # Marion Bartoli # Jelena Jankovic # Vera Zvonareva # Flavia Pennetta # Alla Kudryavtseva # Alisa Kleybanova
ASP0315 is offline  
post #4 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 01:48 AM
Marcela X
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 48,062
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

There's difference between prediction and reality but I hope the prediction on rena will be reality when she wins
Noctis is offline  
post #5 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 01:49 AM
MA5HA
 
Craig.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 33,793
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASP0315 View Post
Who is austin?
and who give a shit about what she says.?
she can go to sleep.
A former world number one and US Open champ.


Les reines de Paris.
Craig. is offline  
post #6 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 01:53 AM
Senior Member
 
ASP0315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,108
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Masharific View Post
A former world number one and US Open champ.
i know she was world number number and i also knows her obsession with sharpova.
Plus 95% of her preditictions are total rubbish. i really can't stand her biased commentary.
anything else.?

Ivo "Grass/Indoor King" Karlovic
Sania Mirza.
Shahar Peer
Flavia Penneta
# Brenda Schultz McCarthy # Elena Dementieva # Olga Govortsova # Marion Bartoli # Jelena Jankovic # Vera Zvonareva # Flavia Pennetta # Alla Kudryavtseva # Alisa Kleybanova
ASP0315 is offline  
post #7 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 01:55 AM
MA5HA
 
Craig.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: La Belle Province
Posts: 33,793
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASP0315 View Post
i know she is world number number and i also knows her obsession with sharpova.
Plus 95% of her preditictions are total rubbish. i really can't stand her biased commentary.
anything else.?
Good to know.

Nope, I'm good


Les reines de Paris.
Craig. is offline  
post #8 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 01:58 AM
Dubai Love
 
Uranium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 52,604
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASP0315 View Post
i know she was world number number and i also knows her obsession with sharpova.
Plus 95% of her preditictions are total rubbish. i really can't stand her biased commentary.
anything else.?
was it her or Evert that favored Sharapova to beat Serena at AO 2007, if so
Austin's stupid opinion doesn't matter to me, the Williams Sisters have great draws to go far and I don't need her to tell me that


Uranium is offline  
post #9 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 02:01 AM
Senior Member
 
ASP0315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,108
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uranium View Post
was it her or Evert that favored Sharapova to beat Serena at AO 2007, if so
Austin's stupid opinion doesn't matter to me, the Williams Sisters have great draws to go far and I don't need her to tell me that
exactly. Austin is the one that predicted serena would lose to Mara Santangelo last year. and yes she also said that sharapova would crush serena in the finals.
She and mary carillo are the worst commentators and "experts" of tennis.

Ivo "Grass/Indoor King" Karlovic
Sania Mirza.
Shahar Peer
Flavia Penneta
# Brenda Schultz McCarthy # Elena Dementieva # Olga Govortsova # Marion Bartoli # Jelena Jankovic # Vera Zvonareva # Flavia Pennetta # Alla Kudryavtseva # Alisa Kleybanova
ASP0315 is offline  
post #10 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 02:24 AM
- - - - - - - - -
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,548
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

I love Tracy's commentating.

★ a. radwanska + lisicki + jankovic
Optima is offline  
post #11 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 02:45 AM
Senior Member
 
InsideOut.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Anapolis Asylum
Posts: 19,582
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by ASP0315 View Post
i know she was world number number and i also knows her obsession with sharpova.
Plus 95% of her preditictions are total rubbish. i really can't stand her biased commentary.
anything else.?
It's not biased, she's just stating the obvious. Virtually everyone says the same things anyway... like Venus playing better at Wimbledon, Serena wanting to do better than the French Open R3 loss, Maria's determination to win and having won here before, Ana riding high on her RG win, Jelena needing to improve her serve, Lindsay being a dark horse and Dina coming into her own, blah blah blah. It's just copy and paste.

Waiting for Ana Ivanovic to just retire already .
Justine Henin. Amelie Mauresmo. Francesca Schiavone.
InsideOut. is offline  
post #12 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 03:17 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,149
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inside-out View Post
It's not biased, she's just stating the obvious. Virtually everyone says the same things anyway... like Venus playing better at Wimbledon, Serena wanting to do better than the French Open R3 loss, Maria's determination to win and having won here before, Ana riding high on her RG win, Jelena needing to improve her serve, Lindsay being a dark horse and Dina coming into her own, blah blah blah. It's just copy and paste.
Exactly.

Actually, usually reading Austin's commentary makes me nauseous. Simply because she just says the fucking obvious. But you'll always find WS fans complaining.

@ her though thinking Ana has a great game for Grass. If Ana doesn't have time to set up her shots, usually she's screwed. Her ground strokes aren't good when it comes to fast reactions, which what she'll face when she plays the big grass players.

Last edited by Apoleb; Jun 22nd, 2008 at 04:07 AM.
Apoleb is offline  
post #13 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 04:01 AM
Senior Member
 
southpaw58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 667
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

The only thing i don't like about Tracy Austin

is that she just talks tooo much. and she really over does some of the background on players. but other then that, she's ok.

I actually kinda like carillo....haha don't hate me guys! hahah

Venus Williams. Serena Williams.
southpaw58 is offline  
post #14 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 05:11 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,152
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

sharapova is the most accomplished grass court player of the last 10yrs so she should be the favorite. She defeated at least 15 top 10 players at wimbledon during her career including the #1 player a couple of times. So much congrats to sharapova.. she's the best grass court player out there so who cares about anything else. Yes she was trounced a couple times over the past 3 yrs by someone name Venus Williams who wasn't even ranked in the top 10 and one time outside the top 20 at the time.
ilovethewilliams is offline  
post #15 of 38 (permalink) Old Jun 22nd, 2008, 05:53 AM
Forget Me Not (July 17)
 
50Sense's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,863
                     
Re: Austin: A trio of favorites at Wimbledon

Why do we read these things anymore?

You don't close your eyes, even for a milli-second,
when Serena is backed into a corner and looking to bust out.
50Sense is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome