Sharapova’s game more than simple good looks - TennisForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 1 (permalink) Old May 10th, 2008, 05:41 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
joão.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 20,780
                     
Sharapova’s game more than simple good looks

Anna Kournikova’s name hardly ever gets mentioned in the same sentence as the words “tennis player” anymore, except to point out that Anna Kournikova could have been a great tennis player.

She had the repertoire of shots. She had the upbringing. She made the semifinals at Wimbledon when she was 16, and you can’t do that unless you have some serious talent.

More than anything, though, Kournikova had the look. And that’s where this story begins and ends.

Seems tennis’ anti-Kournikova has a little bit of a problem brewing.

The talk of the WTA Tour the last few days has been defending Australian Open champion Maria Sharapova’s reluctance to participate in a four-hour photo shoot the governing body of women’s tennis set up for her during next week’s tournament in Rome.

Sharapova rebuffed the invitation to the Italian picture party for what seem to be legitimate reasons: First, she has a 15-hour flight from Los Angeles just to get to the tournament. Second, she actually has the crazy idea that she wants to focus more on swinging the racket than sashaying in front of the WTA’s camera.

Meanwhile, she said the WTA gave her 300,000 good reasons not to just skip out on the event altogether — as in, the amount of American dollars she’d be fined.

“I have set my own personal rules when it comes to doing shoots, and I never do shoots before tournaments because they are mentally draining and I just want to focus on my tennis,” Sharapova said on her Web site. “To be honest, I would love to do this and help promote the tour as much as possible, but to force me to do this shoot the day before a tier 1 tournament is just not right.”

After that, Sharapova or her Webmaster posted a poll asking fans to chime in on what she should do. The options ranged from whether she should just do the shoot, take the fine, take legal action against the WTA or organize a boycott.

Quite frankly, you can make a good case for any of them.

To be fair to the WTA, Sharapova is one of the best players on the tour, the third-ranked player in the world and a multi-millionaire based on endorsements alone. The tour can’t afford not to center its marketing around her popularity, and she probably carries the $300,000 to cover the fine in her spare purse.

But this should be about what’s right and what’s wrong, and from a pure decency angle, the only thing wrong here is the double-standard stance demands the WTA.

In women’s sports, you have traditionally been able to go a long way with the look, and nobody took that to a higher level than did Kournikova. She appeared half-dressed in Maxim. She posed twice for Sports Illustrated’s swimsuit issue. Four times, she was voted one of People Magazine’s most beautiful people. She became famous for being scantily clad.

All the while, commentators, reporters, even some of her colleagues, couldn’t help but talk about how her play suffered.

Sure, she could have been great. She wasn’t though, essentially because she chose not to be. She was popular without tennis, and that’s all she really wanted out of tennis.

Instead, she’s the punch line to a jab women’s tennis hasn’t been shy about throwing over the past five years.

If you listen close enough in

between chuckles at Kournikova, you can hear what’s really going on. The WTA didn’t mind what Kournikova was doing off the tennis court, as long as she was doing her part on the court to glorify the sport.

Now that Sharapova is doing her part on the court, maybe we’re seeing how much the WTA hopes she can be a little more like Kournikova off it.

As close to Kournikova’s visual equal as most men’s magazine readers can stand, Sharapova is on as many posters, in as many commercials and inside as many magazines as Kournikova was, but the difference is that her play got her at least part of the way there.

Want proof? Do a Google search for Anna Kournikova, and a whopping 7.81 million sites appear. Not bad for someone who flamed out of the tennis game five years ago.

But, there are 8.79 million sites that pop up for Sharapova. Which tells you that being a dominant player still counts for something.

If the WTA really wants to promote itself, maybe it should send a photographer out to get photos of Sharapova doing what she is really going to Rome to do.

And that’s play tennis.

http://www.thetimes-tribune.com/site...d=416049&rfi=6

Great article!
And i do agree about the Kournikova first part.
joão. is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome