Remember this wacky Acura Match? ... 2002 Sugiyama def. Hantuchova 64 16 75 - TennisForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old Aug 1st, 2007, 06:33 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tennisIlove09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 44,073
                     
Remember this wacky Acura Match? ... 2002 Sugiyama def. Hantuchova 64 16 75

Hantuchova timed out

Hantuchova was bemused by the umpire's decision


Daniela Hantuchova made a bizarre exit from the Acura Classic in San Diego on Wednesday when she received a time violation on match point against Ai Sugiyama.
The Slovakian felt she had the second round match "taken away" from her, as umpire Denis Overberg stuck rigidly by WTA rules to give Japan's number one a 6-4 1-6 7-5 victory.

It was definitely unfair to finish such a great match like this
Daniela Hantuchova

Hantuchova, the seventh seed, received a warning for a time violation in the second game of the third set before being given a point penalty in the 11th game.
A desperately close contest had been in progress for two-hours and 13 minutes when Hantuchova served at 5-6 and match point down in the final set.
But WTA rules state that a player must start the next point 20 seconds after the previous point has been completed, and Overberg gave the Slovak another point penalty to hand Sugiyama victory.
"I was playing the same way I always do," said Hantuchova. "I never had time violations before.
Umpire Overberg was the centre of attention


"I was not stalling for time deliberately, I was just thinking about what to do on the court.
"I've never heard of this. I felt that I could have won, but somebody came and took the match away from me.
"It was a great match and to have it end like that is really disappointing. But there is nothing that I can do now.
"It was definitely unfair to finish such a great match like this."
Sugiyama admitted she had not been expecting to win in such an unusual manner.
"I was very surprised the way the match ended," she said.
"It's true she was taking a long time in between points. I didn't want to win that way. It's the umpire's decision. "It's tough to lose a match like that, but she was taking a little bit more time than normal."
tennisIlove09 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old Aug 1st, 2007, 06:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Beny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,608
                     
Re: Remember this wacky Acura Match? ... 2002 Sugiyama def. Hantuchova 64 16 75

I remember that
It's ridiculous that the call was made on MP too...but fair on the other hand.
I think the rule should be more severe..or following the rule should be more severe.
Sometimes, some players take much longer time between the points and there is no punishment while Daniela had to pay hard for it..

Simona Halep
Juan Martin Del Potro

Beny is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old Aug 1st, 2007, 07:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 21,972
                     
Re: Remember this wacky Acura Match? ... 2002 Sugiyama def. Hantuchova 64 16 75

rules are rules. if she (or anyone else) thought that time violation shouldn't have been called on MP, they should submit thier proposal to ITF.

PS. She had plenty of warning to be more careful.

PPS. But the match was good.

Vassilissa is my girl............
tenn_ace is offline  
 
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old Aug 1st, 2007, 08:13 PM
La Divina Assoluta
 
The Dawntreader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 11,116
                     
Re: Remember this wacky Acura Match? ... 2002 Sugiyama def. Hantuchova 64 16 75

The rules are there and players have their alloted time too. Even though it was on match-point, it's still any other point and violations still count.

Was bizarre though. Daniela learnt from that though, she's hardly Pierce-esque between points anymore
The Dawntreader is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old Aug 1st, 2007, 08:25 PM
Senior Member
 
DefyingGravity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: London
Posts: 9,604
                     
Re: Remember this wacky Acura Match? ... 2002 Sugiyama def. Hantuchova 64 16 75

I just wish that they'd pull that on Nadal or some of the men sometimes. Nadal and Djokovic take FOREVER. Mary Pierce too...granted, sometimes it's not right to take the player out of their comfort zone.

Tennis's Silver Millennium

Queen Serenity (22), Neo Queen Serenity (Sailor Garbi) (RG '16), Sailor Venus (7), Sailor GOATra (2), Sailor Kerber (2), Sailor Darth Vika (2)
Sailor St. Kim (4), Sailor Mahree (2), Sailor Anci ('08 RG), Sailor Seles (9), Sailor Dokic, Sailor Testud, Sailor Zheng
King Stanimal (3), Shittennou: Gasquet, Djokovic (12), Murray (3), Lajovic, Thiem, Sock, Cuevas
DefyingGravity is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old Aug 1st, 2007, 09:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Europe rocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 12,265
                     
Re: Remember this wacky Acura Match? ... 2002 Sugiyama def. Hantuchova 64 16 75

Surely there are players out there much worse than what Dani was with their timekeeping
Europe rocks is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome