Re: Jankovic and Ana: Do they really have what it takes??
it's nice you try to communicate in english, but still.... it's pretty basic mistakes that you make, well i'm not here to talk about that though...
Ivanovic got to a final and semi-final of grand slam so far this year, i guess this proves that she is a contendor, there are still other players thaat at are a very high level and these two still need the extra experience in these stages of slams. Ivanovic lost both times to the winner of the slam and jankovic lost to the winner and runner-up. At this level of play it is usually the predisposition of the day, as it seemed to me that ivanovic was pretty deflated during her semi. They still have their time while the older generation (henin, mauresmo, williamss eventually) is going to move out. It's possible that they will never win a major. I CAN ACCEPT EVERYTHING, BUT SAYING THAT THEY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH TALENT!!!! YOU ARE NOT THERE TO JUDGE THEM ON THEIR TALENT. TALENT IS NOT FUCKING EVERYTHING!!!!! IF THEY WILL NOT PRACTISE AND WORK OUT THEY WILL NOT GET THERE EVEN WITH A TONE OF TALENT.
YOU CAN'T EVEN JUDGE IF THEY HAVE ENOUGH TALENT, BECAUSE THERE IS NO WAY YOU CAN SAY HOW MUCH TALENT THEY HAVE (YOU DEFINITELY CAN'T SAY WHAT IS TALENT OR DESCRIBE HOW TO MESURE IT!!!!
AND WELL THEY ARE GREAT, BECAUSE IF THEY WOULDN'T THAN A BIMBO LIKE YOU WOULD BE IN THE TOP 10. IF YOU WILL EVER ACHEIVE AS MUCH AS THEY DID WITH THE RESOURCES THEY HAD, THEN YOU CAN SPEAK, OTHERWISE NEVER EVEN DARE TO SPEAK!!!
BRING YOUR EXAMPLES, REASONING AND ANALYSIS, BEFORE YOU MAKE A COMMENT LIKE THAT.
GO TO FREAKING SCHOOL AND LEARN WHAT THESE ABOVE MEAN...