Rankings system absurd - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 05:26 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
bello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,747
                     
Rankings system absurd

Does anyone agree that the ranking system depends too heavily on point defense...eg..Barbara Schett, Petra Mandula, Lina Krasnoroutskaya, Nadia Petrova, Zsofia Gubadci...ect..

their ranking drops do not give a true indication of their curent results and abilities, rather they tell us simply that they did better last year...different with Lina and Nadia of course because its injury related however, with the other players, who havent had results all together that bad, the dramatic rankings drops are unfair. And then there are players like Tauziat, she hasnt played all yaer, still at no.16!!! OMG! anyway, opinions??

I realise this is a big statement, although in part i think many would agree...

JENNIFER CAPRIATI-my now & passionate love and idol..GO JENN! I LOVE U!!!
GABRIELA SABATINI-my first & undying love and idol..miss you & love u Gaby!!!

MONICA SELES~NANCY FEBER~ROMINA OPRANDI~ADRIANA SERRA ZANETTI~SERENA WILLIAMS~MIRJANA LUCIC

Rossana De Los Rios ~ Alicia Molik ~ Flavia Pennetta ~ Trudi Musgrave ~ Francesca Schiavone ~Tatiana Golovin ~ Maria Vento-Kabchi ~ Anna Kournikova ~ Chanda Rubin ~ Brenda Schultz-McCarthy ~ Lina Krasnoroutskaya ~ Monica Niculescu ~ Sania Mirza ~ Cindy Watson ~ Patty Schnyder ~ Ashley Harkleroad ~ Sophie Ferguson ~ Barbora Strykova ~ Barbara Schwartz ~ Maria Emilia Salerni ~ Tsvetana Pironkova ~ Lisa McShea ~ Jelena Dokic ~ Iroda Tulyaganova
bello is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 06:06 AM
Senior Member
 
~ The Leopard ~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kissing my little Lolita
Posts: 13,105
                     
No I don't agree. The rankings are based on how well you have done in the past 12 months at any given time. The concepts of "points defense" etc are just an artifact of the system and useful shorthand. Such an artifact will be produced by any rolling system.

A non-rolling system or a system based on a period of less than 12 months with be distorted by how players have fared at particular major tournaments and on particular surfaces.

The only area where the ranking is distorted IMO is that some of the top players have played less than the maximum 17 tournaments that can count - otherwise they'd have even more points. Even a player with 17 tournaments including a couple of bad ones is disadvanted vis a vis someone with a lot more tournaments to "choose" from, if those 17 include a couple of bad results.

Serena should really be number 1 now, ahead of Venus. Amelie should probably be 10, not 11 (though maybe not... she's fallen far enough behind Sandrine that even a few extra tournaments to choose from would not *necessarily* close the gap).

These minor distortions aside, I think the system is reasonably good. If everyone played, say, 19 or 20 tournaments I think it would work very well.

Vin, kvinder og sang
~ The Leopard ~ is offline  
post #3 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 06:09 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Posts: 298
                     
If you want to see who's the best at this moment, check the results of the last tournament. The ranking is supposed to tell who was the best during the last year, not during the last few weeks. Any system based on a shorter timespan would be a lot more unfair than the current one.

And it doesn't rely on point defense at all. You simply get the points for the tournaments you've played during the last year. The tournaments you won the year before have no impact.

I agree that retired players should be removed from the rankings as soon as they retire though.
smygelfh is offline  
 
post #4 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 12:39 PM
HAND SCRAPED
 
-Sonic-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 7,155
                     
"with the other players, who havent had results all together that bad, the dramatic rankings drops are unfair"

the ranking drops are comlpletely fair. you did well last year, but this year you're not as good.
-Sonic- is offline  
post #5 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 12:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 8,315
                     
The ranking system does not rely heavily on point defense at all. If you play 17 tournaments a year and get exactly 50 points at each one, you will never have this problem. Players who gain large portions of their points from 1 or 2 events need to keep on achieving at those events and others to prove they deserve those points.

You have to answer for Santino, Carlo.
disposablehero is offline  
post #6 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 01:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Wales
Posts: 24,556
                     
Yes if you are relying on defense or you losse your good ranking because of it it probably because you have had one great result and nothing else that good(mandula)

with gaining points gradually the ranking wont suffer come 12 months laster as much!

GOOD LUCK IN 2016 GB TENNIS GIRLS

Johanna Konta, Naomi Broady, Tara Moore, Heather Watson , Laura Robson

Eleanor Dean, Katy DunneKatie Boulter, Sam Murray

Katie Swan, Harriet Dart,
Monica_Rules is offline  
post #7 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 01:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,804
                     
The current system was devised by the WTA to benefit who? Surprise! The WTA!! They don't seem to care if Jennifer loses every one of her WTA events as long as she is selling tickets.
anton is offline  
post #8 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 01:50 PM
Senior Member
 
Experimentee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 13,064
                     
I used to think that until it was explained very clearly by a poster on this board, now i see that it is very fair. It ensures that only points from the past 12 months can be counted, it shouldnt matter what a player has done last year.
Experimentee is offline  
post #9 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 02:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: atlanta
Posts: 653
                     
I presonally think the ranking system is about as close to perfect as can be and have no problems with it. I think those who truly understand how rankings work generally have no problem with it. Didn't the tour about 2 or 3 years back go from a players top 18 or 19 tournaments to their top 17 tournament results. I thought the rational behind this was so that players didn't have to play in as many tournaments and cutting back on the season. I think the rankings are based in part on the number of tournaments you play but also a strong emphasis on your quality of play (i.e. how deep in the draw you get and the quality of the opponents you beat). I find it rather amazing that the current #1 and #2 players in the world have only played in 14 and 12 tournaments respectively in the past 52 weeks. So, it's not necessarily the number of tournaments you play in but the quality of a players results. I find it amazing that Dokic can play in over twice the amount of tournaments of Venus and Serena and still be ranked behind them. I find it amazing, plus when Martina was number 1 she generally had 19 to 21 tournaments on the books. But this is all just my opinion. Nothing more, nothing less.

drsupreme
supremeross is offline  
post #10 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 02:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The lonely desert
Posts: 1,626
                     
Nathalie Tauziat is quite unique. She is average (and sometimes bad) on clay and hardcourt but great (and somtimes brilliant) on grass and carpet.

Last year, she lost in the first round in all the European clay tournaments (except the SF finish in Strasbourg).

She didn't play in Australia. So basically, the only points that have come off so far are the carpet points from early 2001. She won a grasscourt tournament last year, as well as the Wimbledon QF so expect her ranking to drop these next two weeks or so.

But yes, I suspect she has been sitting on her backside for six months sipping martinis by a pool watching her singles ranking drop 2 or so places

No wonder she decided to play doubles again.
Messenger is offline  
post #11 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 11th, 2002, 10:44 PM
HAND SCRAPED
 
-Sonic-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 7,155
                     
she's unique but just a rare anomaly (i dunno if thats spelled right... hmm).
-Sonic- is offline  
post #12 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 12th, 2002, 02:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 35,510
                     
I've always thought the ranking system was messed up. Dewonder Davis has a ranking having never won a set, let alone a match. Enough said.
RiskeFan1 is offline  
post #13 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 12th, 2002, 09:01 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Posts: 2,738
                     
Well at least it's more accurate than the FIFA rankings for football national teams!!
bluepastures is offline  
post #14 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 12th, 2002, 11:39 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
bello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,747
                     
While i see some of your points, i still think its unfair that a player (eg.Mandula, Scheett) can drop so heavily when other players with similar reult in same tournament dont drop at all, simply because they didnt do well last year either.

JENNIFER CAPRIATI-my now & passionate love and idol..GO JENN! I LOVE U!!!
GABRIELA SABATINI-my first & undying love and idol..miss you & love u Gaby!!!

MONICA SELES~NANCY FEBER~ROMINA OPRANDI~ADRIANA SERRA ZANETTI~SERENA WILLIAMS~MIRJANA LUCIC

Rossana De Los Rios ~ Alicia Molik ~ Flavia Pennetta ~ Trudi Musgrave ~ Francesca Schiavone ~Tatiana Golovin ~ Maria Vento-Kabchi ~ Anna Kournikova ~ Chanda Rubin ~ Brenda Schultz-McCarthy ~ Lina Krasnoroutskaya ~ Monica Niculescu ~ Sania Mirza ~ Cindy Watson ~ Patty Schnyder ~ Ashley Harkleroad ~ Sophie Ferguson ~ Barbora Strykova ~ Barbara Schwartz ~ Maria Emilia Salerni ~ Tsvetana Pironkova ~ Lisa McShea ~ Jelena Dokic ~ Iroda Tulyaganova
bello is offline  
post #15 of 16 (permalink) Old Jun 12th, 2002, 01:22 PM
Moderator - BFTP
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 22,717
                     
Bello-it's "fair" because the rankings are based on a YEAR, not one event. If your ranking is so dependent on one event, you deserve to drop. Besides, you haven't offered your alternative ranking system. What changes would you suggest?
Rollo is online now  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome