Must be tough for the ATP to developp a fan base - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 12:39 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 135
                     
Must be tough for the ATP to developp a fan base

With Costa winning the french open

From the ATP
It's the first time in the Open era that there have been four straight first-time Grand Slam winners, with Costa following Ivanisevic at Wimbledon, Lleyton Hewitt at the U.S. Open, and Thomas Johansson at the Australian Open.

Another sign that there is depth in men's tennis -- and no superstar -- right now: The past eight majors have been won by eight men.


Depth is good at the middle but not at the top in my opinion
What do you think, they can't even develop good rivalry like the wta

Posted by Mad-about Venus: So true

To me Pam is a frustraded person who needs to live with the fact that she never won a Slam during her pathetic career, and she was never a threat to anybody. She resents the fact that players can get to places she always dreamed about. Unfortunatelly she has a microphone in her mouth and that allows her to spread a whole bunch of BS. That gives her joy. Someone should tell her to stick that micro somewhere else, she would get even more joy that way.
frenchvee is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 12:52 AM
Senior Member
 
angele87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 15,226
                     
Well I don't think the problem is too much depth on the men's side I think it's more or less that the dominating players on hard courts, aren't very good on clay and vice versa so right now you have a very dominating (in term of ranking points) world number one (Lleyton) who is just so so on clay and last year you had a very dominating number one (Guga) who wasn't very good on hardcourts and on grass... the wta doesn't really have that problem. The top ten are all about the same on all surfaces so the rivalries are there all year and the fanbase has time to build up throughout the year where as on the men's side, it doesn't. For example, somebody who just happened to start watching tennis this week will have a chance to watch and support venus and serena a lot throught the year where as Costa and Juanqui probably won't win very much until the clay court season next year

Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you will ever regret. - Ambrose Bierce

There is no saint without a past, and no sinner without a future. - Shri Haidakhan Babaji

Wisdom is the quality that keeps you from getting into situations where you need it. - Doug Larson

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. - Aristotle
angele87 is offline  
post #3 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 12:59 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Preston, England
Posts: 4,351
                     
I agree with ANGELE87.
I was going to say the exact same thing.
Cassius is offline  
post #4 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 01:12 AM
Senior Member
 
tennischick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: cerca de aquí
Posts: 5,730
                     
good point Angele and nice post. but i still think the ATP has more depth now than it did say during the Sampras/Agassi era. (and Sampras dominated for years despite his inablity to win on clay). lack of depth creates better rivalries at the top. depth means that it's anyone's game. the WTA is therefore now where the ATP used to be -- top-heavy, a handful of players dominating. which is why the WTA can still market its "stars". it is up to the ATP to find creative new ways of marketing its new depth as a good thing and stop focussing almost exclusively on the "new balls". the "star" era of the ATP is probably over -- despite Lleyton's huge lead.

"For now, Roddick seems to play with the intelligence of a fence post."
Greg Couch, Chicago Sun Times
tennischick is offline  
post #5 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 01:27 AM
Senior Member
 
angele87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 15,226
                     
I totally agree, the ATP has more depth now than it had in the Sampras/Agassi era however it's debatable whether or not that's a good or bad thing for the ATP. Sure it's great that different players are winning every week and that it's impossible to predict who will win a certain tournament but things like that aren't very good to build a fanbase. When Sampras and Agassi were winning all the time, a lot of people became big fans of theirs and in turn fans of tennis and now that they're (well mostly Sampras really) not as good as they use to be, those people are still watching tennis and in time have discovered new players to support. But right now it's true that there are a lot of die hard fans (as seen on this board) but it's going to become rarer and rarer that just the occasional tennis watcher becomes a die hard fan because it's hard to find one player to support throughout the year and to become a die hard fan you need to really watch tennis for more than a month. I think right now the WTA has the best formula to attract new fans. IMO what the ATP needs right now is a dominating player, a big name to pop up, to popularize atp tennis. The WTA right now has that with the Williams sisters plus Anna but the ATP doesn't really have anybody to attract people to the sport and it's a damn shame because non-atp fans don't know what they're missing out on.

Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you will ever regret. - Ambrose Bierce

There is no saint without a past, and no sinner without a future. - Shri Haidakhan Babaji

Wisdom is the quality that keeps you from getting into situations where you need it. - Doug Larson

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. - Aristotle
angele87 is offline  
post #6 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 01:32 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,454
                     


The ATP will survive

Johnny Mac said the tour is in need of a dominating player. I think its true. The crowd really need someone they can cheer for or boo. Whatever way you look at it I guess.
ttaM is offline  
post #7 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 01:32 AM
Senior Member
 
tennischick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: cerca de aquí
Posts: 5,730
                     
Angele:
oh i agree that it is not a good thing to have this much depth. it's bad for developing a fan base as you point out. the point of good marketing is to take something bad -- like coffee, cigarettes and sausage -- and get us to feel good about ourselves when we consume them. and since depth is not going to go away, the ATP will have to find incredibly creative ways of marketing it as a good thing. the WTA will face the same problem in another 10 years or so. coke or pepsi?

"For now, Roddick seems to play with the intelligence of a fence post."
Greg Couch, Chicago Sun Times
tennischick is offline  
post #8 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 01:40 AM
Senior Member
 
baleineau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In Albert Costa's Arms
Posts: 2,918
                     
the WTA is doing well the last 3-4 years, but is starting to fall away again IMO. Lindsay, Martina and Anna's injury problems are largely responsible, because you get a situation where there are only three real contenders for the Slams without them (Venus, Serena and Jen). The other top players (Kim, Justine, Monica, Jelena and Amelie) don't look like winning the Slams. They'll pick up a couple of Tier I and Tier II events per year, but that's about it.

In the early- to mid-1990s, the WTA suffered badly from lack of depth beyond the top-5, and even then Graf, Seles or ASV almost always picked up the titles. The WTA is not like this yet, but it could swing back soon to this level.

Also, there are different kinds of depth. On the ATP tour, the depth comes from there genuinely being around 20-30 guys that have a chance to win big titles through being broadly equal in their play. On the WTA, the recent increase in depth has largely been through injuries to key players at the top, creating pseudo depth.

You have long been my goal, been my chasing, been my soul. I have hung out on the edge. But I just couldn't let go. There's a time to forgive. There's a time to forget. Close your eyes, get ready, set. Walk me down this fall I'm taking but don't let me go yet. Oh let me go, sweetheart, throw me, around you, like you know me. And remember me too. Remember me too from a dream i had of you. Mary Margaret O'Hara | Dream I Had | Apartment Hunting | 2002.
baleineau is offline  
post #9 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 01:51 AM
Senior Member
 
angele87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 15,226
                     
I hate both coke and pepsi

I agree with you though tennischick, depth can be a great thing. Depth is a great thing but it's almost like talent... great when it's utilized but a totaly waste when it's not. The ATP need to find a way to show off their depth but it's going to be hard without one player that can really attract the general public's attention because (although it's a real shame to say it) tennis isn't a sport that can just attract the general sports fan the same way soccer or hockey does We can kind of compare tennis to golf. The only difference now is that golf has Tiger Woods and he has popularised golf... now because of him, entire golf tournaments are being broadcast on national tv where as tennis, without somebody like that, is still getting only tape delayed coverage of finals, and that's only for 5 or 6 tournaments a year. The ATP needs a Tiger Woods of sorts, a dominating, well publicised player that is known outside the sport!

Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you will ever regret. - Ambrose Bierce

There is no saint without a past, and no sinner without a future. - Shri Haidakhan Babaji

Wisdom is the quality that keeps you from getting into situations where you need it. - Doug Larson

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. - Aristotle
angele87 is offline  
post #10 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 01:59 AM
Senior Member
 
tennischick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: cerca de aquí
Posts: 5,730
                     
are you actually conceding that Lleyton cannot do it despite his dominance? ack! the horror!! i promise i won't tell the folks in the ATP forum

i love coke. of course it's bad for me but those marketing ploys catch me everytime. as for pepsi -- i gave up on it ever since Wacko Jacko's hair caught on fire. or was that coke?

"For now, Roddick seems to play with the intelligence of a fence post."
Greg Couch, Chicago Sun Times
tennischick is offline  
post #11 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 02:16 AM
Senior Member
 
angele87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 15,226
                     
at tennischick... no I don't think Lleyton can do it for three reasons... and this is totally unbiased since I am a huge Lleyton fan:

1) Even me, a huge fan, can admit that he's not the most likeable guy on tour... unforetunately he's far too contreversial to be liked by just the casual fan... IMO he has the people that are huge fans (like me) and then people that don't like him I think it's unforetunate that so many people hate him because he's really not as horrible as he'd made out to be

2) He's not a great clay courter and he's not totally dominant on hard courts... I think he'd need one of the two. It's true that he is dominating on hardcourt and the best on hardcourts at the moment but when he plays the U.S Open, can anybody say he's close to guaranteed to win it, the way Pete was with Wimbledon a few years back?

3) He's too shy, too personal. He doesn't do many interviews and doesn't seem to be very big on endorsements or commercials which doesn't make his accesible to as many people as it could

Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you will ever regret. - Ambrose Bierce

There is no saint without a past, and no sinner without a future. - Shri Haidakhan Babaji

Wisdom is the quality that keeps you from getting into situations where you need it. - Doug Larson

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. - Aristotle
angele87 is offline  
post #12 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 02:55 AM
Senior Member
 
tennischick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: cerca de aquí
Posts: 5,730
                     
of course you're mostly right about Lleyton. i don't know whether he is as horrible as "he'd made out to be". in his defence (yes!), i have a theory that his parents cling too flipping much and that's why he's often so cranky -- would you want your parents hanging onto you the way his does to him? Capriati deservedly gets trounced for having Stefano in her space all the time. but i don't see a whole lot of criticism for Lleyton who actually does the same thing! in any event his parents' continued presence does not explain the James Blake incident. or the flowers. (ugh!) actually i think his own actions have indicted him pretty badly bec they all happened on a public stage in front of thousands (live and on TV). he's not the best sell IMO. and it's too bad bec even his romance with sweet Kim is the kind of stuff that PR folks dream of.

which means that the ATP has no choice but to start an "Old Balls" campaign and call Agassi back out for PR duty... i wonder if they could persuade Steffi and Jaden to sign up?

"For now, Roddick seems to play with the intelligence of a fence post."
Greg Couch, Chicago Sun Times
tennischick is offline  
post #13 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 03:04 AM
Senior Member
 
angele87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 15,226
                     
I say Lleyton isn't as bad as he's made out to be because some people on this board are quick to accuse him of being some kind of criminal or something which he's note. The U.S Open incident was really inappropriate, stupid and ignorant and I fear that it's something that will be held against him for the rest of his career you're right though, he's not the best sell However I think if his relationship with Kim was a bit more publicised, Lleyton would become a better sell because you can't say he's some kind of evil guy when he's being all cute and sweet with Kimmie

Well I don't Agassi can make the ATP big again simply because he's past his prime now... the ATP need somebody new, somebody exciting and (although I hate so say this too) Andy Roddick isn't going to be it. I think the person that's going to be make the ATP popular is somebody that we haven't even heard of yet... some unkwown junior who's going to come up and win Wimbledon or something...

Speak when you are angry and you will make the best speech you will ever regret. - Ambrose Bierce

There is no saint without a past, and no sinner without a future. - Shri Haidakhan Babaji

Wisdom is the quality that keeps you from getting into situations where you need it. - Doug Larson

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. - Aristotle
angele87 is offline  
post #14 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 03:09 AM
Senior Member
 
tennischick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: cerca de aquí
Posts: 5,730
                     
Richard Gasquet? Jmes Blake?

i agree about Lleyton and Kim. that's what i was trying to say. that could off-set a whole bunch of bad publicity.

i'm off to bed. nice chatting with ya!

"For now, Roddick seems to play with the intelligence of a fence post."
Greg Couch, Chicago Sun Times
tennischick is offline  
post #15 of 26 (permalink) Old Jun 10th, 2002, 01:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sometimes U.S./Sometimes Asia
Posts: 1,536
                     
There IS a lot more depth on the ATP these days, AND there are more one-surface specialists. The two are related. Like Pete Sampras gets slammed for being a terrible clay-courter. I mean, he did get to the semis at the French, he won the Italian Open over Becker, and he beat Agassi at Houston this year. The problem, like Pete said himself, is "When Rod Laver won the Grand Slam, he only had to worry about four or five guys, but when I play the French Open, I have to worry about a 100 Spaniards and South Americans!"

This over-depth is not good for the ATP, at least not in the U.S. Tennis is a star-driven sport, and there just aren't superstars among the men these days (except for Agassi, and the time on his meter is clicking away). Now, it feels like one player gets on a hot streak, wins a big tournament, gets injured, and never really reaches that same level again (Rios, Moya, Phillipousis, Norman, the list goes on and on). Do you remember when Becker, Lendl, Edberg, and John McEnroe were at the very top? The rivalries between them were so exciting, and the fans had favorites they cheered for. Nowadays, I don't really care who wins on the men's side, and I don't think I'm alone.

It really is a shame, because the level of tennis is amazing on the ATP. In fact, from a strictly technical point of view, I think men's tennis is far superior to women's tennis (much better winner-to-unforced error ratio and more all-court games). But like I said, tennis is a star-driven sport, so I'm a much bigger fan of the WTA, where Venus, Serena, Anna, Lindsay, Martina, and company aren't just tennis players. They're "divas."
tommyk75 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome