Can any rivalry on WTA pass Federer-Nadal rivalry? - TennisForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 01:46 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,489
 
Can any rivalry on WTA pass Federer-Nadal rivalry?

I think WTA has been left behind by ATP in terms of popularity this season.

There are lots of interesting stories on ATP like Nadal's claycourt record, Federer's grass record, their rivalry, Roddick's struggle etc.

On the woman's side not much happened except Martina's comeback.

Do you think any rivalry among 2 WTA players pass the Federer-Nadal rivalry in terms of popularity?
borisy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 01:47 AM
Senior Member
 
Demosthenes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Dark Tower
Posts: 43,762
                     
I wouldn't call Federer and Nadal a rivalry. I think there are some rivalries on the women's side who are already much more interesting.

formerly iPatty

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vikapower View Post
And to think that Génie is 0-4 against this Kvitova player. Sometimes tennis is just not logical at all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shvedbarilescu View Post
I wouldn't be surprised to see Aga finish her career ahead of Vika and Petra as well.
Demosthenes is online now  
post #3 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 01:50 AM
Senior Member
 
vwfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,841
                     
not much a rivalry, if federer constantly loses.
vwfan is offline  
post #4 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 01:50 AM
Senior Member
 
MH0861's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 14,278
                     
If Serena can get herself together, Serena/Sharapova was always going to be a great one.
MH0861 is offline  
post #5 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 01:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Joana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Yugoslavia
Posts: 10,994
                     
I think the trio of Serena, Justine and Maria has great potential for interesting rivalries. All of them are strong characters, all have some kind of history between them and their matches tend to be exciting. Too bad they never seem to play at the same time.
Joana is offline  
post #6 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 01:57 AM
Two and counting.
 
Derek.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dublin
Posts: 25,897
                     
Like Federer said about his H2H with Roddick. It's not a rivalry until the other player wins some too.

It's no rivalry, it's just that Federer is Nadal's bitch.

Serena/Maria
Serena/Jennifer
Lindsay/Venus
Venus/Serena
Venus/Martina
Lindsay/Martina

All of those are good.
Derek. is offline  
post #7 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 01:59 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,489
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jedem
Like Federer said about his H2H with Roddick. It's not a rivalry until the other player wins some too.

It's no rivalry, it's just that Federer is Nadal's bitch.

Serena/Maria
Serena/Jennifer
Lindsay/Venus
Venus/Serena
Venus/Martina
Lindsay/Martina

All of those are good.
There is something you don't consider.

Federer can reach later rounds on Nadal's best service so they have a matchup on clay and Federer loses... but Nadal can't reach later rounds in Federer's best surface (grass) so we see no matchups on clay that can make H2H more balanced.
borisy is offline  
post #8 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 02:01 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: wtaworld
Posts: 2,142
                     
This one could be nasty: Anna Tchakvetadze vs Aravane Rezai.
timray is offline  
post #9 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 02:01 AM
Senior Member
 
faboozadoo15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: united states
Posts: 21,865
                     
i feel like there are a lot of compelling rivalries at the top of women's tennis.

nadal will always have a favorable head to head against federer if he never reaches a final on grass or an american hardcourt. the only times they play is when nadal is on his best form and federer's worst.
faboozadoo15 is offline  
post #10 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 02:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Neuchâtel
Posts: 11,063
                     
no

at the suggestion it's not a rivalry. 5 matches played on clay - all very competitive. Rome final was probably the best match tennis has seen for a decade. Put 5 matches on grass there head to head would be even. And then on hard it's a huge rivalry again.

Women's tennis has nothing on it except prettier outfits (some might say).

Sorry to sound like a chauvanist pig but it's true
switz is offline  
post #11 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 02:18 AM
Senior Member
 
tennisIlove09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 44,073
                     
I think the ATP is too predictable.

On hard courts, grass courts, indoors courts ... Federer always wins.
On clay courts, Nadal always wins.

Should Nadal actually have a good week on hard courts or grass, he beats Federer, but off clay they are move even. I think its 2-1 Nadal. On clay, Nadal leads like 4-0. So, that has a lot to do with it.

I think right now the WTA is very unpredictable. Anyone in the top 10 can win a title any given week. On clay you favor JHH and Mauresmo (outside Paris of course). On grass you favor Venus and Sharapova (Davenport and Serena). On hard courts though, I think it's any one's game. Given the fact that since the start of 2004 its been so wide spread at the majors is proof of this.

2004
JHH - Myskina - Sharapova - Kuznetsova - Serena - JHH - Venus - Clijsters - Mauresmo - JHH

Only JHH is the repeat champ, and twice on clay. Its anyone's game, which makes it exciting to watch.
tennisIlove09 is offline  
post #12 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 02:25 AM
Senior Member
 
sfselesfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nirvana
Posts: 5,916
                     
Federer/Nadal does qualify as a rivalry...but certainly not a classic rivalry...yet.

There are many more interesting rivalries on the women's side already. I think the Venus/Hingis/Davenport rivalry is captivating...and has had new life breathed into it with the return of Martina to the scene.

I think Serena/Henin/Clijsters have a nice rivalry going too. Sharapova and Mauresmo have started to get into that mix.

The women's game is SOOOO deep right now. For years this is what we wished for. Slam finals with different women in them each time. For years we had to see #1 vs. #2 in the final with #1 winning almost every tournament. It's much more interesting having rivalries made up of more than two women.

SF
sfselesfan is offline  
post #13 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 02:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Neuchâtel
Posts: 11,063
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by tennisIlove09
Only JHH is the repeat champ, and twice on clay. Its anyone's game, which makes it exciting to watch.
the WTA tour is a comedy of errors and injuries. Whoever makes the least and stays fit long enough wins.
switz is offline  
post #14 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 02:30 AM
Senior Member
 
Joana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Yugoslavia
Posts: 10,994
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by switz
no

at the suggestion it's not a rivalry. 5 matches played on clay - all very competitive. Rome final was probably the best match tennis has seen for a decade. Put 5 matches on grass there head to head would be even. And then on hard it's a huge rivalry again.

Women's tennis has nothing on it except prettier outfits (some might say).

Sorry to sound like a chauvanist pig but it's true
The Rome final was exciting, but the RG final was crap. I agree their rivalry is by far the best in tennis right now, but Roger better step it up because it's looking increasingly less like a rivalry and more like a domination.
Joana is offline  
post #15 of 87 (permalink) Old Jun 20th, 2006, 02:34 AM
Sunset, Moonrise, Winter
 
Sam L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Eurasian Steppe
Posts: 34,222
                     
Roger has 7 slams. Nadal has 2. A rivalry?

Well I don't know. We've got the Serena Williams - Pierce rivalry I guess.

Divas: Seles, Sharapova, Muguruza
Pas de Quatre:
Swan Lake, Giselle, The Nutcracker, Coppélia

Sam L is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome