have anyone noticed? - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 04:45 AM Thread Starter
country flag rhz
Senior Member
 
rhz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,009
                     
have anyone noticed?

Although Venus won more majors,and tournaments, but Serena is the one who play more in the Tier 1 throughout the years!

look at the tournament selection this year, Venus didn't play a Tier 1, except Miami. She supposed to play Rome, but withdraw

Serena played in Charleston, Miami, Rome and Berlin!

i think this is one of the reasons although Venus is winning a lot of tournaments, but Jen is still #1. but on the other hand it is good for Serena also, because they are trying to avoid each other, and Serena doesn't play as many tournament as Venus, so she has to enter the big ones!

what do you think?

Maju terus Tenis Indonesia!
rhz is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 04:51 AM
Senior Member
 
irma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: the netherlands
Posts: 13,635
 
Serena said at the start of this year that she would serious try to conquer the tennisworld this year and to do that she has to play the biggest tournaments
maybe she more hungry as Venus right now

In the middle of the night
I go walking in my sleep
Through the desert of the truth
To the river so deep
We all end in the ocean
We all start in the streams
We're all carried along
By the river of dreams
In the middle of the night
irma is offline  
post #3 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 01:14 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Williams Rulez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Venus!
Posts: 20,610
                     
Talking

Yup... that is called smart scheduling...

VENUS
Serena
Lindsay Jelena Maria

Mary : Monica : Svetlana : Sania : Jennifer : Amelie
Roddick : Grosjean : David : Djokovic
Williams Rulez is offline  
post #4 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 01:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Catskill Mtns., NY, USA
Posts: 1,564
                     
What's really interesting about Serena's scheduling is that it's making it possible (not necessarily likely, but possible) that she could lose in the finals at both RG and Wimbledon, and get to #1 without holding any of the Slam titles.

She's currently less than 600 points behind Capriati, and if she were to reach the finals of both RG and W, she'd gain 326 Round Points at both, plus more quality points. Now, for this scenario to happen, she'd have to hope that:

a) Venus doesn't win Wimbledon;

b) RG and Wimbledon are won by different people.

But having said all this, I think it would be a hoot to have Serena as #1 not holding any Slams. Considering how nuts everybody went at the end of 2000 and 2001 with Hingis and Davenport as the respective #1s without holding a Slam, it would be an interesting turnabout.
Ted of Teds Tennis is offline  
post #5 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 02:00 PM
I'm so current, I'm tomorrow.
 
AjdeNate!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The City by the Lake.
Posts: 49,163
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by Ted of Teds Tennis
...I think it would be a hoot to have Serena as #1 not holding any Slams. Considering how nuts everybody went at the end of 2000 and 2001 with Hingis and Davenport as the respective #1s without holding a Slam, it would be an interesting turnabout.
I agree wholheartedly!
AjdeNate! is offline  
post #6 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 03:51 PM
A4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ithaca
Posts: 621
                     
What kind of turnabout? Everyone will go nuts again about a number one without a slam. What makes you think there'll be any different reaction this time?
A4 is offline  
post #7 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 03:54 PM
I'm so current, I'm tomorrow.
 
AjdeNate!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The City by the Lake.
Posts: 49,163
                     
I think 'turnabout' meaning the player not the circumstance.
AjdeNate! is offline  
post #8 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 08:50 PM
A4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ithaca
Posts: 621
                     
Sure. Thats my point. Why should anybody expect that Serena will not be held to the same standard Davenport was held to, or at least scrutinised with the same intensity? The circs are the same. The players different. I don't think anyone should be making thinly-veiled insinuations that some players are held to different standards while others will have excuses made for them. At least, lets wait till that scenario happens, which I doubt will materialise, cos Serena will win at least one slam this year.
A4 is offline  
post #9 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 10:38 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Manhattan,NYC
Posts: 2,057
                     
Well If Serena wins Rg then she will win Wimbly and Venus will win USopen and OZ2003...That is the plan.If Serena makes it to semis of RG she will still win Wimbly...

When I think of life, sometimes my response is "Oh Damn!". But I still think of life anyway, "Oh Damn!!!"
maccardel is offline  
post #10 of 17 (permalink) Old May 21st, 2002, 11:05 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 994
                     
I think the deal is that Serena plays in the slightly bigger tournaments, whereas Venus plays in MORE tournaments.
Asmus is offline  
post #11 of 17 (permalink) Old May 22nd, 2002, 12:42 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hobe Sound, FL
Posts: 1,396
                     
orion

Uhhh...

Serena was injured early this year at Sidney.
She missed the AO, Tokyo, and Antwerp, which Venus sub'ed for her.

Without these injuries, she would have had a similar number of tourneys as Venus.

She just MIGHT have been #2 by now.
VS Fan is online now  
post #12 of 17 (permalink) Old May 22nd, 2002, 12:56 AM
Senior Member
 
tennischick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: cerca de aquí
Posts: 5,730
                     
has anyone noticed?

yep i noticed. said so just last night in an exchange with TennisPower.

when Hingis did it, it was called "padding". but it seems to be OK for Venus.

and if she becomes and remains # 1 after winning these lesser tournies, that apparently will be quite OK.

like i said last night, as far as i am concerned the party is all Serena's. go Serena!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quote:
Originally posted by rhz
Although Venus won more majors,and tournaments, but Serena is the one who play more in the Tier 1 throughout the years!

look at the tournament selection this year, Venus didn't play a Tier 1, except Miami. She supposed to play Rome, but withdraw

Serena played in Charleston, Miami, Rome and Berlin!

i think this is one of the reasons although Venus is winning a lot of tournaments, but Jen is still #1. but on the other hand it is good for Serena also, because they are trying to avoid each other, and Serena doesn't play as many tournament as Venus, so she has to enter the big ones!

what do you think?
tennischick is offline  
post #13 of 17 (permalink) Old May 22nd, 2002, 01:07 AM
Veelieve!!!
 
Infiniti2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 27,817
 
Quote:
when Hingis did it, it was called "padding". but it seems to be OK for Venus.
How could you compare Venus of 2002 to Hingis of 2000 & 2001?? Did I miss something?? The last time I checked Venus had 2 slams under her belt :P

Infiniti2001 is offline  
post #14 of 17 (permalink) Old May 22nd, 2002, 01:27 AM
Senior Member
 
tennischick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: cerca de aquí
Posts: 5,730
                     
Quote:
Originally posted by Infiniti2001
How could you compare Venus of 2002 to Hingis of 2000 & 2001?? Did I miss something?? The last time I checked Venus had 2 slams under her belt :P
hope you dont mind that i deleted the color in your post. it's a tad blinding. and here's my point:

In 2001, Hingis played in 4 slams, 7 (out of a possible 9) Tier I tournies, 6 Tier II tournies, and 1 Tier III tourny. she played in the sole Tier III tourny (in Doha) but only did so at the request of the WTA and for which she was given a hefty appearance fee as part of a promotion deal.

Venus on the other hand played in 4 slams, 3 Tier I tourneys and 5 Tier II tourneys.

or we could compare their careers to date:

since 1993 (when she was 13), Hingis has played in a total of 137 tournies. here is the breakdown:

Slams 29 (21.2%) (29 of 29 since her first slam in 1995)
WTA Championships 5 (3.6%) (5 of 6 she qualified for)
Tier I 44 (32.1%)
Tier II 46 (33.5%)
Tier III 2 (1.5%)
Unk. 5 (3.6%) (Essen in 1994, Oakland & Chicago in 1996, Grand Slam Cup in 1998 & 1999)
Olympics 1 (.7%)
ITF Circuit 5 (3.6%)

Since entering the tour in 1994 at age 14, Venus has played in 86 tournies. here is her breakdown:

Slams 19 (22.1%)(19 of 20 since her first slam in 1997)
WTA Championships 1 (1.2%) (1 of 3 she qualified for)
Tier I 20 (23.3%)
Tier II 36 (41.9%)
Tier III 3 (3.5%)
Unk. 6 (7%) (Oakland in 1994, 1995, 1996, Grand Slam Cup in 1998 & 1999, Hannover in 1999)
Olympics 1 (1.2%)

in your opinion, which of these two women has played at more "smaller" tournies compared to "bigger" tournies? the notion that Hingis has padded her resume with a whole slew of smaller tournies is a myth found only on tennisborads. it is simply not true.

but my real point is that Serena has played higher level tournies more consistently than her sister. it's time to separate these two in our accolades. Serena rules!!!!!!!!!
tennischick is offline  
post #15 of 17 (permalink) Old May 22nd, 2002, 04:43 AM
A4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: ithaca
Posts: 621
                     
Are you by any chance saying Venus does the "padding"?

I hate beating up on an injured girl, but I wonder how many tournaments Hingis won in 2001, regardless of tier level.

So Venus decides to enter lower tier tournaments hoping to win those as she has no hope of winning the higher tier tournaments. In that way, she keeps the number 1 ranking. Is that what is being implied? Correct me if I'm mistaken.
A4 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome