About Paris Semis: WTF is Julie Halard-Decugis talking about? - TennisForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 6 (permalink) Old Feb 11th, 2006, 11:01 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,489
 
About Paris Semis: WTF is Julie Halard-Decugis talking about?

Julie Halard-Decugis's note-book
11 February 2006 - Rédaction Open Gaz de France
Every day, Julie Halard-Decugis gives her opinion on the 14th Open Gaz de France. Today, she talks about the semi-finals before discussing the Pierce-Mauresmo final. (Picture: DR)


Pierce - Schnyder
As a spectator, I have to say I've been a little dispappointed with Schnyder, who had played really well so far. I hadn't imagined the match could go that way, with Patty immediately acting quite nonchalant and irritated by the crowd's reaction. She had trouble handling that specific type of pressure and she obviously was not in a good day today, since Mary was not playing incredibly well either. But she managed to take charge, playing her own game, and most unforced errors and winners were hers. The irregular pace of the match prevented Patty from making the right adjustment. Mary's strength these days is her serve, as well as her ability to improve her game during a match. That was the case today, when she started moving her legs, and then her arm, faster in the second game so she could be free to play the way she wanted.

Golovin - Mauresmo
I think Amélie gave a lot against Safina so she was a little tired today. It showed in the first set, when she was ahead 5-0 but was still not playing 100%. She was not moving fast enough, gave away a few points and could not really count on her serve. Golovin noticed that and became more aggressive as she was gaining confidence. She hit high-quality returns and managed to make Amélie move a lot. And most of all, except for a couple of games early in the third round, she played extremely consistently. She deserves compliments for that. But yesterday, Golovin won her match after saving a match point and when that happens, you often lose the next match after missing a match point. But to Amélie's credit, she's the type of athlete who fights really hard even when she's not playing too well.

The Pierce - Mauresmo final
I have the feeling Mary will be much less tired. Today, Amelie was exhausted at the end of her match, you could tell it from her face. The way she recovers will be capital. Also, if she doesn't serve better, she won't make it. But if she has enough energy to go to the net, then I'll be expecting a tough match. On the other hand, if both players are at the top, Amélie should win, as she has more alternative solutions in her game. The key factor will be whether or not Amélie can stop moving back when she's threatened.

borisy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 6 (permalink) Old Feb 12th, 2006, 01:33 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,951
                     
She's just saying that it's hard for one to win when they've seen what can happen to a player after having a match point.

For example:
She saw Petrova lose after having a match point. Meaning that she saw herself, after having the match point vs. Mauresmo, losing too.

Paldias is offline  
post #3 of 6 (permalink) Old Feb 12th, 2006, 03:10 AM
Senior Member
 
hablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 49,954
                     
interesting comments from Julie H-D...

sounds like she gives Mary the edge


I don't think she said anything bad about Golovin
maybe she has experienced the same thing about winning after saving a match pt, then losing next match when having a mp :P

Quote:
19. In the period from January to April 2006 Dr. Skalny sent very detailed messages to Ms Sharapova [...]: “Mildronate 1-2 X 10, repeat in 2 wks (before training or competition)”; “1 hr before competition, 2 pills of Mildronate”; “During games of special importance, you can increase your Mildronate dose to 3-4 pills (1 hr before the match). However, it is necessary to consult me on all these matters (please call)”; “30 minutes prior to a training session: Mildronat – 1 Capsule. 30-45 minutes prior to a tournament Mildronat 2 capsules”.
hablo is offline  
post #4 of 6 (permalink) Old Feb 12th, 2006, 04:09 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 946
                     
very interesting
theklein is offline  
post #5 of 6 (permalink) Old Feb 12th, 2006, 06:52 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 222
                     
I read the sentence four times and I still don't know what it means, though logically it was most likely meant to mean what Paldias said.
krystlel is offline  
post #6 of 6 (permalink) Old Feb 12th, 2006, 11:52 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,489
 
What she means is if you win a match by saving a match point, in the next match you're destined to lose a match by wasting a macth point. The most stupid thing I've ever heard about tennis
borisy is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome