Why only Miami is Mandatory? Why not all Tier 1?? - TennisForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 05:02 AM Thread Starter
country flag rhz
Senior Member
 
rhz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,009
                     
Why only Miami is Mandatory? Why not all Tier 1??

I mean it's not fair.. I know Miami is the strongest Tier 1 out there and it's like the 5th GS. but tournies like Tokyo, Montreal/Toronto, and Moscow need to be mandatory as well. Those Tier 1 tournies were always the ones that top players are skipping. Especially Tokyo, right after OZ open.

Maju terus Tenis Indonesia!
rhz is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 05:16 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Neuchâtel
Posts: 11,064
                     
probably because it's got the most sponsors lined up, the WTA is very Florida, it's both men's and women's, and most players play anyway so making it mandatory will cause the least controversy.

The ATP makes the Masters Series events mandatory and it doesn't seem to make much difference - players still skip Monte Carlo, Madrid etc.

Life isn't fair
switz is offline  
post #3 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 05:16 AM
Senior Member
 
xin_hui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Singapore
Posts: 16,569
                     
if tokyo is constantly skipped by top players, why make it mandatory? isnt miami a better choice since most players play it anyway? this way it wont ruffle too much feathers

and making all tier 1s mandatory will just kill the players, and it will just end up like the tennis masters series on the ATP tour. all of them are mandatory, but do all players play them?
xin_hui is offline  
post #4 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 05:19 AM
Senior Member
 
alwayshingis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,035
                     
You can't make something like Tokyo/Moscow mandatory because the draw is so small. People in the 30's aren't going to want to play quallies and the #9 player is not going to want to play a tournament where she is not seeded.
alwayshingis is offline  
post #5 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 05:25 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Neuchâtel
Posts: 11,064
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by gurl_tennis
and making all tier 1s mandatory will just kill the players, and it will just end up like the tennis masters series on the ATP tour.
agree with you on most things but the WTA tier I being like the Masters Series would be a very good thing IMO. they need for cohesion to get better coverage.
switz is offline  
post #6 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 05:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,112
                     
sure make everything compulsory.
make slaves out of our tennis players.
if they are not all-ready.

Zauber is offline  
post #7 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 05:56 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,673
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhz
I mean it's not fair.. I know Miami is the strongest Tier 1 out there and it's like the 5th GS. but tournies like Tokyo, Montreal/Toronto, and Moscow need to be mandatory as well. Those Tier 1 tournies were always the ones that top players are skipping. Especially Tokyo, right after OZ open.
The main reason is that the players would object, and they are by far the most powerful force in women's tennis. Making ANY tournaments mandatory is a change. And I wouldn't be surprised if some players skip Miami despite it's being mandatory. Davenport hasn't played it the last couple years. Players who often do badly on clay often skip Berlin and Rome. And of course, making Indian Wells mandatory is just asking for bad publicity.

Larry Scott has said publicly he intends to get up to five or six mandatory tournaments. But he didn't say how soon. It may well be a case of adding one per year. Rome is the next obvious candidate, from a practical perspective.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.

Last edited by Volcana; Feb 9th, 2006 at 04:14 PM.
Volcana is offline  
post #8 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 09:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: East Java
Posts: 2,781
                     
If I'm Larry Scott, I would pick at least one tier I on every surface to get the mandatory status.

Hard: Miami
Clay: Berlin (Rome is too near to RG's schedule)
Grass: Upgrade Eastbourne to be a tier I
Indoor: Zurich

So we would have 9 main events: 4 slams (january, may, june, september), 1 YEC (november) and 4 mandatory tournaments (march, may, june, october).

Justine HENIN
2003, 2005, 2006, 2007 RG
2003, 2007 USO
2004 AO
2004 Olympic Gold
2006, 2007 YEC
10 Tier I, 17 Tier II, 3 Tier III, 1 Tier IV
ns_Henin is offline  
post #9 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 10:26 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,003
                     
I think that there is a plan to make about 5 Tier Is compulsary for the top players.
jonny84 is offline  
post #10 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 03:15 PM
Senior Member
 
Perseust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Out There
Posts: 14,462
                     
I think that they should also make FedCups mandatory..so that top players, i mean more top players play it.
Perseust is offline  
post #11 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 03:32 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,957
                     
I dpn't think we need a Tier I on grass

i would say toronto instead of eastbourne
mr_burns is offline  
post #12 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 04:22 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 24,673
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by ns_Henin
If I'm Larry Scott, I would pick at least one tier I on every surface to get the mandatory status.

Hard: Miami
Clay: Berlin (Rome is too near to RG's schedule)
Grass: Upgrade Eastbourne to be a tier I
Indoor: Zurich
I think the decision is likely to be made in terms of finances, not logic. Giving it some thought though, I think you're right about Berlin, but not because Rome is too close to RG. If I'm not mistaken, the owners of Doha would liel to make that tournament a Tier I. They are also the owners of Berlin. Yet they made a public commitment to keep Berlin at the Tier I level. I imagine the WTA may have made certain promises in return for that commitment. Yet I haven't heard any word on adding another Tier I. But making Berlin mandatory would certainly be fair compensation for keeping the tournament at the Tier I level, which perhaps there really isn't the crowd support for.

Aimless speculation.

Proud to be an American
Not blind. Not uninformed. We are party to atrocities. But the response of the world after 9/11 is worth noting. Even our most dire enemies offered aid. We should all be so lucky.
Volcana is offline  
post #13 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 05:23 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,096
                     
Because there is no sense to whats a Tier 1, the Tier 1s don't reflect the future growth areas for the tour and the tour is set up so that only some top players play them.

If you made all tier 1s compulsory and added the Gs there would be hardly any time left for top players to play Tier 2s. That would undermine the Tier 2s fatally and would also leave players without warm up competitions for at least 2 GS. It would mean players all turning up where few wanted to be at odd times and places (Tokyo), lower ranked players never seeing or playing a top player for most of the year and the breeding ground for new players dying as crowds and TV deserted star-less lower tier tournaments.

Apart from that its unenforceable as players seem to be less motivated by ranking points at the top (everyone is number 1 at some point and no one is going to pile up Graf or Hingis totals for weeks at the top, so does it matter if you are 3 or 6?) and all it will produce is bigger and bigger heaps of sick notes....Indian Wells would produce a plague all on its own...

Last edited by fammmmedspin; Feb 9th, 2006 at 05:29 PM.
fammmmedspin is offline  
post #14 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 9th, 2006, 06:15 PM
Senior Member
 
SAEKeithSerena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 8,921
                     
"If you made all tier 1s compulsory and added the Gs there would be hardly any time left for top players to play Tier 2s. That would undermine the Tier 2s fatally and would also leave players without warm up competitions for at least 2 GS. It would mean players all turning up where few wanted to be at odd times and places (Tokyo), lower ranked players never seeing or playing a top player for most of the year and the breeding ground for new players dying as crowds and TV deserted star-less lower tier tournaments."


great point

Serena Williams.

16-Time Grand Slam Champion.

2013 Titles: Brisbane, Sony Open (Miami), Family Circle Cup, Madrid, Rome, 16th SLAM-THE FRENCH OPEN, Bastad, Roger's Cup

2013 Record: (60-4)
SAEKeithSerena is offline  
post #15 of 21 (permalink) Old Feb 10th, 2006, 12:32 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 294
                     
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAEKeithSerena
"If you made all tier 1s compulsory and added the Gs there would be hardly any time left for top players to play Tier 2s. That would undermine the Tier 2s fatally and would also leave players without warm up competitions for at least 2 GS. It would mean players all turning up where few wanted to be at odd times and places (Tokyo), lower ranked players never seeing or playing a top player for most of the year and the breeding ground for new players dying as crowds and TV deserted star-less lower tier tournaments."


great point
I think the point here is not that all Tiers 1's should be mandatory, but that Miami shouldn't be. Two mandatory events, on the same surface, in the same country? Doesn't that favour some players over others?
wolfgang is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome